Dataset Information

Flow velocity quantification by exploiting the principles of the Doppler effect and magnetic particle imaging.

ABSTRACT: Changes in blood flow velocity play a crucial role during pathogenesis and progression of cardiovascular diseases. Imaging techniques capable of assessing flow velocities are clinically applied but are often not accurate, quantitative, and reliable enough to assess fine changes indicating the early onset of diseases and their conversion into a symptomatic stage. Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) promises to overcome these limitations. Existing MPI-based techniques perform velocity estimation on the reconstructed images, which restricts the measurable velocity range. Therefore, we developed a novel velocity quantification method by adapting the Doppler principle to MPI. Our method exploits the velocity-dependent frequency shift caused by a tracer motion-induced modulation of the emitted signal. The fundamental theory of our method is deduced and validated by simulations and measurements of moving phantoms. Overall, our method enables robust velocity quantification within milliseconds, with high accuracy, no radiation risk, no depth-dependency, and extended range compared to existing MPI-based velocity quantification techniques, highlighting the potential of our method as future medical application.

SUBMITTER: Pantke D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7907137 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Flow velocity quantification by exploiting the principles of the Doppler effect and magnetic particle imaging.

Pantke Dennis D Mueller Florian F Reinartz Sebastian S Kiessling Fabian F Schulz Volkmar V

Scientific reports 20210225 1

Changes in blood flow velocity play a crucial role during pathogenesis and progression of cardiovascular diseases. Imaging techniques capable of assessing flow velocities are clinically applied but are often not accurate, quantitative, and reliable enough to assess fine changes indicating the early onset of diseases and their conversion into a symptomatic stage. Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) promises to overcome these limitations. Existing MPI-based techniques perform velocity estimation on th ...[more]

PMID: 33633162

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Phase contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is widely employed for flow quantification, but analysis typically requires time consuming manual segmentation which can require human correction. Advances in machine learning have markedly improved automated processing, but have yet to be applied to PC-CMR. This study tested a novel machine learning model for fully automated analysis of PC-CMR aortic flow. METHODS:A machine learning model was designed to track aortic valve borders based on neural network approaches. The model was trained in a derivation cohort encompassing 150 patients who underwent clinical PC-CMR then compared to manual and commercially-available automated segmentation in a prospective validation cohort. Further validation testing was performed in an external cohort acquired from a different site/CMR vendor. RESULTS:Among 190 coronary artery disease patients prospectively undergoing CMR on commercial scanners (84% 1.5T, 16% 3T), machine learning segmentation was uniformly successful, requiring no human intervention: Segmentation time was <?0.01?min/case (1.2?min for entire dataset); manual segmentation required 3.96?±?0.36?min/case (12.5?h for entire dataset). Correlations between machine learning and manual segmentation-derived flow approached unity (r?=?0.99, p?<?0.001). Machine learning yielded smaller absolute differences with manual segmentation than did commercial automation (1.85?±?1.80 vs. 3.33?±?3.18?mL, p?<?0.01): Nearly all (98%) of cases differed by ?5?mL between machine learning and manual methods. Among patients without advanced mitral regurgitation, machine learning correlated well (r?=?0.63, p?<?0.001) and yielded small differences with cine-CMR stroke volume (? 1.3?±?17.7?mL, p?=?0.36). Among advanced mitral regurgitation patients, machine learning yielded lower stroke volume than did volumetric cine-CMR (? 12.6?±?20.9?mL, p?=?0.005), further supporting validity of this method. Among the external validation cohort (n?=?80) acquired using a different CMR vendor, the algorithm yielded equivalently small differences (? 1.39?±?1.77?mL, p?=?0.4) and high correlations (r?=?0.99, p?<?0.001) with manual segmentation, including similar results in 20 patients with bicuspid or stenotic aortic valve pathology (? 1.71?±?2.25?mL, p?=?0.25). CONCLUSION:Fully automated machine learning PC-CMR segmentation performs robustly for aortic flow quantification - yielding rapid segmentation, small differences with manual segmentation, and identification of differential forward/left ventricular volumetric stroke volume in context of concomitant mitral regurgitation. Findings support use of machine learning for analysis of large scale CMR datasets.

Dataset Information

Flow velocity quantification by exploiting the principles of the Doppler effect and magnetic particle imaging.

Publications

Flow velocity quantification by exploiting the principles of the Doppler effect and magnetic particle imaging.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure