Dataset Information

Investigation of the relationships between the alveograph parameters.

ABSTRACT: Alveograph analysis is an established method for flour characterisation, and several alveograph parameters have been introduced over the years. Typically, ten parameters are found for every analysis from the air pressure curve in the modern versions of the alveograph, but the relationships between the parameters and their potential redundancy are not well described in the literature. In this work, an overview of the parameters is provided, including how they are found and what they may represent, and the integral relationship between the parameters was investigated using Pearson correlation analysis of the parameters from 532 pressure curves. The parameters G (swelling index), Dmax (maximum of first derivative), SH (strain hardening index) and K (strength coefficient) exhibited very strong correlations with other alveograph parameters (r?>?0.97), and these parameters do therefore not provide additional information. The parameters P (maximum overpressure), L (abscissa at rupture), W (deformation energy), P/L (configuration ratio), Ie (elasticity index) and Dmin (minimum of first derivative) on the other hand, represent a relatively basic set of parameters that uniquely characterises various parts of the pressure curves and thus the dough rheology/physics during dough inflation. Nevertheless, even between this basic set of parameters relatively strong correlations were found, signifying that they are interrelated, as they all are affected by changes in the dough constituents.

SUBMITTER: Jodal AS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7935897 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Investigation of the relationships between the alveograph parameters.

Jødal Anne-Sophie Schou AS Larsen Kim Lambertsen KL

Scientific reports 20210305 1

Alveograph analysis is an established method for flour characterisation, and several alveograph parameters have been introduced over the years. Typically, ten parameters are found for every analysis from the air pressure curve in the modern versions of the alveograph, but the relationships between the parameters and their potential redundancy are not well described in the literature. In this work, an overview of the parameters is provided, including how they are found and what they may represent ...[more]

PMID: 33674707

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundScaffolds are of great importance in tissue engineering applications as they provide a mechanically supportive environment for cellular activity, which is particularly necessary for hard tissues such as bone. Notably, the mechanical properties of a scaffold vary with differing design parameters such as those related to scaffold height and internal structure. Thus, the present study aimed to explore the relationship between design parameters and mechanical properties of composite polycaprolactone (PCL) and nano-hydroxyapatite (nHAp) scaffolds fabricated by three-dimensional (3D) printing.MethodsWe designed and printed scaffolds with different internal structures (lattice and staggered) and varying heights (4, 6, 8 and 10 layers), and consistent porosity (50%) for the purpose of comparison. Then, we examined the scaffold microstructure (pore size and penetration between layers) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mechanical properties (elastic modulus and yield strength) using compressive testing.ResultsOur results illustrated that the microstructural parameters were related to scaffold design. At higher heights, pore size increased while penetration between layers decreased; thus, mechanical properties were affected. Results of mechanical testing demonstrated that for lattice scaffolds, elastic modulus was similar for 6 vs 4, and 8 vs 4 layers but ~33% lower for 10 layers vs 4 layers. Similarly, yield strength was comparable for 6 vs 4, and 8 vs 4 layers but ~27% lower for 10 layers vs 4 layers. With staggered scaffolds, when compared to 4-layer results, elastic modulus was similar for 6 layers but was ~43% lower for 8 layers and ~38% lower for 10 layers. Staggered scaffolds had ~38%, ~51%, and ~76% lower yield strength when the number of layers were increased from 4 to 6, 8, and 10 layers, respectively. When comparing lattice and staggered scaffolds with the same layer number, elastic modulus was similar, apart from 8-layer scaffolds where the staggered design was ~42% lower than lattice. Yield strength was similar between 4-layer staggered and lattice scaffolds, while staggered scaffolds with 6, 8, and 10 number of layers showed ~43%, ~45%, ~68% lower strength, respectively, than those found in lattice scaffolds with the same layer numbers.ConclusionsMechanical properties of 3D printed scaffolds depended on scaffold height for both lattice and staggered internal structures. Staggered scaffolds had lower mechanical properties than the lattice scaffolds with the same height and were more sensitive to the change in scaffold height. Taken together, lattice scaffolds demonstrated the advantages of more stable mechanical properties over staggered scaffolds. Also, scaffolds with lower height were more promising in terms of mechanical properties compared to scaffolds with greater height.

Dataset Information

Investigation of the relationships between the alveograph parameters.

Publications

Investigation of the relationships between the alveograph parameters.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets