Dataset Information

Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of PRMT5 in Cancers: A System Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Since protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is abnormally expressed in various tumors, in this study we aim to assess the association between PRMT5 and clinicopathological and prognostic features.

Methods

Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched until July 25, 2021. The critical appraisal of the eligible studies was performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated to assess the effect. Engauge Digitizer version 12.1, STATA version 15.1, and R version 4.0.5 were used to obtain and analysis the data.

Results

A total of 32 original studies covering 15,583 patients were included. In our data, it indicated that high level of PRMT5 was significantly correlated with advanced tumor stage (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.22-3.70, P =.008; I2 = 80.7%) and positively correlated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.46-1.73, P < .001; I2 = 50%) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24-1.88, P < .001; I2 = 0%). In addition, sub-group analysis showed that high level of PRMT5 was associated with poor overall survival for such 5 kinds of cancers as hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, and lung cancer.

Conclusion

For the first time we found PRMT5 was pan-cancerous as a prognostic biomarker and high level of PRMT5 was associated with poor prognosis for certain cancers.

SUBMITTER: Liang Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8591649 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundGPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the relationship between GPRC5A and cancer prognosis. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall prognostic effectiveness of GPRC5A.MethodsWe first conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane, and WangFang databases. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were then pooled to assess the associations between GPRC5A expression and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival (EFS), and clinicopathological characteristics. Chi-squared test and I2 statistics were completed to evaluate the heterogeneity in our study. A random-effects model was used when significant heterogeneity existed (I2>50% and p<0.05); otherwise, we chose the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis was stratified by tumor type, region, HR obtained measurements, and sample capacity to explore the source of heterogeneity.ResultsIn total, 15 studies with 624 patients met inclusion criteria of this study. Our results showed that higher expression of GPRC5A is associated with worse OS (HR:1.69 95%CI: 1.20-2.38 I2 = 75.6% p = 0.000), as well as worse EFS (HR:1.45 95%CI: 1.02-1.95 I2 = 0.0% p = 0.354). Subgroup analysis indicated that tumor type might be the source of high heterogeneity. Additionally, cancer patients with enhanced GPRC5A expression were more likely to lymph node metastasis (OR:1.95, 95%CI 1.33-2.86, I2 = 43.9%, p = 0.129) and advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.83, 95%CI 1.15-2.92, I2 = 61.3%, p = 0.035), but not associated with age, sex, differentiation, and distant metastasis.ConclusionGPRC5A can be a promising candidate for predicting medical outcomes and used for accurate diagnosis, prognosis prediction for patients with cancer; however, the predictive value of GPRC5A varies significantly according to cancer type. Further studies for this mechanism will be necessary to reveal novel insights into application of GPRC5A in cancers.

Project description:BackgroundThe aberrant regulation of MALAT1 has been indicated to be involved in various carcinogenic pathways contributing to the tumourigenesis and progression of cancers. The current meta-analysis summarized the research advances of MALAT1 functions and analyzed its prognostic value among multiple types of cancers.MethodsEligible studies were identified through retrieving the PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI databases, up to Mar 1, 2018. 28 studies of 5436 patients and 36 studies of 3325 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis to evaluate the association of MALAT1 expression with survival outcomes and clinical parameters.ResultsThe results demonstrated that over-expression of MALAT1 may predict lymph node metastasis (pooled OR = 2.335, 95% CI 1.606-3.395, P = 0.000) and distant metastasis (pooled OR = 2.456, 95% CI 1.407-4.286, P = 0.002). Moreover, MALAT1 was also related with tumour size (pooled OR = 1.875, 95% CI 1.257-2.795, P = 0.002) and TNM stage (pooled OR = 2.034, 95% CI 1.111-3.724, P = 0.021). Additionally, elevated MALAT1 expression could predict poor OS (pooled HR = 2.298, 95% CI 1.953-2.704, P = 0.000), DFS (pooled HR = 2.036, 95% CI 1.240-3.342, P = 0.005), RFS (pooled HR = 2.491, 95% CI 1.505-4.123, P = 0.000), DSS (pooled HR = 2.098, 95% CI 1.372-3.211, P = 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR = 1.842, 95% CI 1.138-2.983, P = 0.013) in multivariate model. Importantly, subgroup analyses disclosed that increased MALAT1 expression had a poor OS among different cancer types (Estrogen-dependent cancer: pooled HR = 2.656, 95% CI 1.560-4.523; urological cancer: pooled HR = 1.952, 95% CI 1.189-3.204; glioma: pooled HR = 2.315, 95% CI 1.643-3.263; digestive cancer: pooled HR = 2.451, 95% CI 1.862-3.227).ConclusionsThe present findings demonstrated that MALAT1 may be a novel biomarker for predicting survival outcome, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis.

Project description:Background: Although the treatment of cancer has made evident progress, its morbidity and mortality are still high. A tumor marker is a critical indicator for early cancer diagnosis, and timely cancer detection can efficiently help improve the prognosis of patients. Therefore, it is necessary to identify novel markers associated with cancer. LncRNA myocardial infarction associated transcript (MIAT) is a newly identified tumor marker, and in this study, we aimed to explore the relationship between MIAT and clinicopathological features and patient prognosis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library from inception to September 2020 to identify correlational studies. Then, we extracted valid data and used Stata software to make forest plots. We used the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI to evaluate the relationship between aberrant expression of MIAT and patients' prognosis and clinicopathological features. Results: The study included 21 studies, containing 2,048 patients. Meta-analysis showed that overexpression of lncRNA MIAT was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.60, 95% CI, 1.31-1.96, p < 0.001). In addition, high expression of MIAT could forecast tumor size (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.34-3.81, p = 0.002), distant metastasis (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.84-3.50, p < 0.001), TNM stage (OR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.36-4.18, p = 0.002), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.59, 95% CI 1.25-5.36, p = 0.011), and the degree of differentiation (OR = 2.65, 95% CI 1.54-4.58, p < 0.001). However, other clinicopathological features, including age (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.87-1.32, p = 0.516), gender (OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.77-1.19, p = 0.668), and histology (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.10, p = 0.128) were not significantly different from high expression of MIAT. Conclusions: Our study showed that overexpression of MIAT is related to poor overall survival and clinicopathological features. MIAT can be considered a novel tumor marker to help diagnose tumors earlier and improve patient prognosis.

Project description:BackgroundTripartite motif-containing protein 21 (TRIM21), a member of the ubiquitin ligase family, makes a significant contribution to the ubiquitination of multiple tumor marker proteins associated with tumor cell proliferation, metastasis and selective apoptosis. As the research further develops, an increasing number of studies have manifested that the TRIM21 expression level can be considered an indicator of cancer prognosis. However, the interrelationship between TRIM21 and multiple forms of carcinogens has not been demonstrated in a meta-analysis.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature retrieval in various electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Besides, the hazard ratio (HR) and the pooled relative risk (RR) were integrated in the assessment of cancer incidence and cancer mortality by Stata SE15.1. Additionally, we used an online database based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to further validate our results.ResultsA total of 17 studies were included, totaling 7239 participants. High expression of TRIM21 was significantly correlated with better OS (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.91; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.42-0.91; P < .001). We found that high TRIM21 expression predicted significant impact on clinical characteristics like decreased lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.97-1.30; P < .001), tumor stage (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.82-1.37; P < .001) and tumor grade (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.56-2.05; P < .001). However, TRIM21 expression had no significant impact on other clinical characteristics such as age (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.91-1.25; P = .068), sex (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95-1.12; P = .953), or tumor size (RR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.97-1.33; P = .05). Based on the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) online analysis tool, TRIM21 was significantly downregulated in 5 cancers while significantly upregulated in 2 cancers, and the descending expression of TRIM21 predicted shorter OS in 5 cancers, worse PFS in 2 malignancies, while the elevated expression of TRIM21 predicted shorter OS and worse PFS in 2 carcinomas.ConclusionsTRIM21 could serve as a new biomarker for patients with solid malignancies and could be a potential therapeutic target for patients.

Project description:Background Numerous studies have reported that abnormally HOXA cluster antisense RNA 2 (HOXA-AS2) expression plays a critical role in various cancers. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic value of HOXA-AS2 in human cancers. Methods Databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data, were searched to retrieve articles on HOXA-AS2 and the prognosis of cancer patients, which were then screened. The association between HOXA-AS2 and overall survival (OS) and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with cancers were assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) combined with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A subgroup analysis and the Begg test were used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed to verify the results, and the potential regulation mechanism of HOXA-AS2 in cancers was revealed by an immune analysis. Results A total of 17 articles, comprising 1,176 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that high HOXA-AS2 expression was associated with worse OS, advanced tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis in cancer patients but was not related to age, sex, or poor histological grade. The results of the analysis of TCGA data further supported our findings. Additionally, the immune analysis revealed that the expression of HOXA-AS2 was associated with immune cell infiltration and various immune checkpoints. Conclusions In summary, our results suggest that the high expression of HOXA-AS2 is associated with poor prognosis and the clinicopathological characteristics of cancer patients; thus, it could serve as a prognosis biomarker and therapeutic target for various cancers. However, the small sample size of this study and the inclusion of participants of a single race might have affected the generalizability of our findings. Thus, large-sample, multicenter studies need to be conducted to further evaluate the prognostic role of HOXA-AS2.

Project description:Background: Silent information regulator 2 homolog 1 (SIRT1) is an evolutionarily conserved enzymes with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)+-dependent deacetylase activity. SIRT1 is involved in a large variety of cellular processes, such as genomic stability, energy metabolism, senescence, gene transcription, and oxidative stress. SIRT1 has long been recognized as both a tumor promoter and tumor suppressor. Its prognostic role in cancers remains controversial. Methods: A meta-analysis of 13,138 subjects in 63 articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed to evaluate survival and clinicopathological significance of SIRT1 expression in various cancers. Results: The pooled results of meta-analysis showed that elevated expression of SIRT1 implies a poor overall survival (OS) of cancer patients [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.566, 95% CI: 1.293-1.895, P < 0.0001], disease free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.631, 95% CI: 1.250-2.130, P = 0.0003), event free survival (EFS) (HR = 2.534, 95% CI: 1.602-4.009, P = 0.0001), and progress-free survival (PFS) (HR = 3.325 95% CI: 2.762-4.003, P < 0.0001). Elevated SIRT1 level was associated with tumor stage [Relative Risk (RR) = 1.299, 95% CI: 1.114-1.514, P = 0.0008], lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.172, 95% CI: 1.010-1.360, P = 0.0363), and distant metastasis (RR = 1.562, 95% CI: 1.022-2.387, P = 0.0392). Meta-regression and subgroup analysis revealed that ethnic background has influence on the role of SIRT1 expression in predicting survival and clinicopathological characteristics of cancers. Overexpression of SIRT1 predicted a worse OS and higher TNM stage and lymphatic metastasis in Asian population especially in China. Conclusion: Our data suggested that elevated expression of SIRT1 predicted a poor OS, DFS, EFS, PFS, but not for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CCS). SIRT1 overexpression was associated with higher tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis. SIRT1-mediated molecular events and biological processes could be an underlying mechanism for metastasis and SIRT1 is a therapeutic target for inhibiting metastasis, leading to good prognosis.

Project description:BackgroundDysregulation of the long non-coding RNA small nucleolar RNA host gene 16 (lncRNA SNHG6) has been found in multiple cancers. However, a definite conclusion on the clinical value of lncRNA SNHG6 expression in human cancers has not been determined. The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to comprehensively elucidate the association between SNHG6 expression and clinical outcomes in cancers.MethodsA systematic search was performed through the PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wangfang databases for relevant studies. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected to estimate the prognostic value, and the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were used to evaluate the relationship between lncRNA SNHG6 expression and clinicopathological features, including tumor invasion depth, lymph node metastasis (LNM), distance metastasis (DM), and TNM stage.ResultsIn total, 914 patients from 13 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that evaluated SNHG6 expression could predict an unfavorable overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.04, 95% CI:1.56-2.52) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.996). Subgroup analysis indicated a significant association between high SNHG6 expression and shorter OS in those studies with digestive system cancers (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.47-2.62), or with sample size < 70 (HR = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.29-4.11), or with multivariate analysis (HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.44-2.64). Moreover, elevated SNHG6 expression was positively associated with tumor invasion depth (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.18-2.63), LNM (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.18-2.17), DM (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.37-2.64) and advanced TNM stage (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.36-2.60) in patients with cancers.ConclusionsHigh lncRNA SNHG6 expression was correlated with tumor invasion depth, LNM, DM, and advanced TNM stage, suggesting that SNHG6 may serve as a promising prognostic biomarker of human cancers.