Dataset Information

How to manage synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer patients?

ABSTRACT:

Backgrounds

We aimed to evaluate the prognosis in patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) by comparing the differences between double primary cancer (DPC) and metastatic cancer (MC).

Methods

The medical records of 47 patients diagnosed synchronously with endometrial and ovarian cancer between January 2006 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-eight and 19 patients were diagnosed with DPC and MC, respectively. Demographics, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and 5-year overall survival (OS) were compared. The clinical factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The demographics were not different between both groups. Endometrioid histology and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade were higher in the MC group than in the DPC group (42.1% vs. 10.7%; P = 0.018, P = 0.002, respectively). The ratio of post-operative adjuvant therapy was not different in both groups. Recurrence occurred in five patients with DPC and seven with MC. The difference in RFS was not significantly different (P = 0.131) but the OS was different between both groups (P = 0.020). Histology and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were associated wtih RFS in univariate analysis, but no difference was found in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Although DPC patients had longer OS, multivariate analysis did not identify any influential factors. Focus should be placed on defining the appropriate adjuvant treatment for high-risk patients, which will improve prognosis, rather than on discriminating between DPC and MC.

SUBMITTER: Shin W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8088669 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: The aim of our study was to investigate the rate of secondary carcinomas in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). In particular, we wanted to describe the subset of patients with endometrial and simultaneous ovarian carcinoma (OC), including outcomes. The study also compared patients with EC and ovarian metastasis with patients with EC and simultaneous OC. Patients and Methods: Data from 251 patients with primary endometrial carcinoma who underwent surgery in the years 2005-2009 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tübingen, were analysed retrospectively. Results: A total of 28 patients (11.1?%) had a secondary carcinoma: 18 patients (7.1?%) had OC; 9 (3.5?%) patients had a history of breast cancer, and one patient (0.4?%) respectively had simultaneous carcinoma of the vulva or bladder. 14 patients (5.5?%) had advanced stage EC with ovarian metastasis or, in one case, metastasis to the ovarian tube. Patients with ovarian metastasis had a mean age of 71.2?±?9.2 years at primary diagnosis, making them significantly older compared to patients with EC and simultaneous OC (55.3?±?11.8 years, p?<?0.001). Moreover, patients with ovarian metastasis significantly more often had EC with a higher tumour grade (grade 1: 0, grade 2: 21.4?%, grade 3: 78.6?%) compared to patients with simultaneous EC and OC (grade 1: 11.1?%, grade 2: 77.8?%, grade 3: 11.1?%; p?<?0.001). Conclusion: Almost one in 10 patients with EC had a secondary carcinoma. The most common secondary carcinoma was OC followed by breast cancer. This should be taken into account in the diagnosis and therapy of patients with EC. Patients with simultaneous EC and OC were significantly younger than patients with EC and ovarian metastasis. In addition, their tumour had better prognostic features: thus, the tumour grade of the EC was significantly lower. Overall, the prognosis for patients with synchronous EC and OC is better than that for patients with EC and ovarian metastasis.

Project description:Sporadic synchronous endometrial (ECs) and ovarian cancers (OCs), although clinically considered to be independent primaries, have been shown to be clonally related and likely constitute metastases from each other. We sought to define whether synchronous ECs/OCs in patients with DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficiency syndromes would be clonally related. We subjected synchronous ECs/OCs from four patients (LS3-LS6) with clinically confirmed Lynch syndrome (LS) and one patient with constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) to massively parallel sequencing targeting 468 cancer-related genes. Somatic mutations, copy number alterations (CNAs), clonal relatedness and clonal decomposition analyses were performed using previously described bioinformatics methods. All synchronous ECs/OCs analyzed were considered independent primaries based on clinicopathologic criteria. Sequencing analysis revealed that the ECs/OCs of three cases (LS2-CMMRD, L3, L4) harbored similar repertoires of somatic mutations and CNAs and were clonally related. In these three cases, a subset of subclonal mutations in the EC became clonal in the OC, suggesting that the EC was likely the substrate from which the OC developed. LS5's EC/OC had distinct mutational profiles but shared specific CNAs. In contrast, LS6's EC/OC harbored distinct somatic mutations and lacked CNAs, consistent with each tumor constituting an independent primary lesion. In LS5 and LS6, PTEN mutations and PTEN loss of protein expression were found to be restricted to the EC. Finally, re-analysis of sequencing data of sporadic synchronous ECs/OCs supported the observations made in the current study that the directionality of progression is likely from the endometrium to the ovary. In conclusion, contrary to sporadic synchronous ECs/OCs, which are almost invariably clonally related, ECs/OCs simultaneously involving the uterus and ovary in LS patients may represent distinct primary tumors. A subset of MMR-deficiency syndrome-related synchronous ECs/OCs, however, may originate from a single primary tumor at variance with their clinical diagnosis, with the endometrium being the likeliest site of origin.