Dataset Information

Pulmonary ventilation imaging based on 4-dimensional computed tomography: comparison with pulmonary function tests and SPECT ventilation images.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT)-based pulmonary ventilation imaging is an emerging functional imaging modality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the physiological significance of 4D-CT ventilation imaging by comparison with pulmonary function test (PFT) measurements and single-photon emission CT (SPECT) ventilation images, which are the clinical references for global and regional lung function, respectively.

Methods and materials

In an institutional review board-approved prospective clinical trial, 4D-CT imaging and PFT and/or SPECT ventilation imaging were performed in thoracic cancer patients. Regional ventilation (V4DCT) was calculated by deformable image registration of 4D-CT images and quantitative analysis for regional volume change. V4DCT defect parameters were compared with the PFT measurements (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1; % predicted) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC; %). V4DCT was also compared with SPECT ventilation (VSPECT) to (1) test whether V4DCT in VSPECT defect regions is significantly lower than in nondefect regions by using the 2-tailed t test; (2) to quantify the spatial overlap between V4DCT and VSPECT defect regions with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC); and (3) to test ventral-to-dorsal gradients by using the 2-tailed t test.

Results

Of 21 patients enrolled in the study, 18 patients for whom 4D-CT and either PFT or SPECT were acquired were included in the analysis. V4DCT defect parameters were found to have significant, moderate correlations with PFT measurements. For example, V4DCT(HU) defect volume increased significantly with decreasing FEV1/FVC (R=-0.65, P<.01). V4DCT in VSPECT defect regions was significantly lower than in nondefect regions (mean V4DCT(HU) 0.049 vs 0.076, P<.01). The average DSCs for the spatial overlap with SPECT ventilation defect regions were only moderate (V4DCT(HU)0.39 ± 0.11). Furthermore, ventral-to-dorsal gradients of V4DCT were strong (V4DCT(HU) R(2) = 0.69, P=.08), which was similar to VSPECT (R(2) = 0.96, P<.01).

Conclusions

An 18-patient study demonstrated significant correlations between 4D-CT ventilation and PFT measurements as well as SPECT ventilation, providing evidence toward the validation of 4D-CT ventilation imaging.

SUBMITTER: Yamamoto T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8112248 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of deep learning (DL)-based computed tomography (CT) ventilation imaging (CTVI).MethodsA total of 71 cases that underwent single-photon emission CT 81m Kr-gas ventilation (SPECT V) and CT imaging were included. Sixty cases were assigned to the training and validation sets, and the remaining 11 cases were assigned to the test set. To directly transform three-dimensional (3D) CT (free-breathing CT) images to SPECT V images, a DL-based model was implemented based on the U-Net architecture. The input and output data were 3DCT- and SPECT V-masked, respectively, except for whole-lung volumes. These data were rearranged in voxel size, registered rigidly, cropped, and normalized in preprocessing. In addition to a standard estimation method (i.e., without dropout during the estimation process), a Monte Carlo dropout (MCD) method (i.e., with dropout during the estimation process) was used to calculate prediction uncertainty. To evaluate the two models' (CTVIMCD U-Net , CTVIU-Net ) performance, we used fivefold cross-validation for the training and validation sets. To test the final model performances for both approaches, we applied the test set to each trained model and averaged the test prediction results from the five trained models to acquire the mean test result (bagging) for each approach. For the MCD method, the models were predicted repeatedly (sample size = 200), and the average and standard deviation (SD) maps were calculated in each voxel from the predicted results: The average maps were defined as test prediction results in each fold. As an evaluation index, the voxel-wise Spearman rank correlation coefficient (Spearman rs ) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) were calculated. The DSC was calculated for three functional regions (high, moderate, and low) separated by an almost equal volume. The coefficient of variation was defined as prediction uncertainty, and these average values were calculated within three functional regions. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test for a significant difference between the two DL-based approaches.ResultsThe average indexes with one SD (1SD) between CTVIMCD U-Net and SPECT V were 0.76 ± 0.06, 0.69 ± 0.07, 0.51 ± 0.06, and 0.75 ± 0.04 for Spearman rs , DSChigh , DSCmoderate , and DSClow , respectively. The average indexes with 1SD between CTVIU-Net and SPECT V were 0.72 ± 0.05, 0.66 ± 0.04, 0.48 ± 0.04, and 0.74 ± 0.06 for Spearman rs , DSChigh , DSCmoderate , and DSClow , respectively. These indexes between CTVIMCD U-Net and CTVIU-Net showed no significance difference (Spearman rs , p = 0.175; DSChigh , p = 0.123; DSCmoderate , p = 0.278; DSClow , p = 0.520). The average coefficient of variations with 1SD were 0.27 ± 0.00, 0.27 ± 0.01, and 0.36 ± 0.03 for the high-, moderate-, and low-functional regions, respectively, and the low-functional region showed a tendency to exhibit larger uncertainties than the others.ConclusionWe evaluated DL-based framework for estimating lung-functional ventilation images only from CT images. The results indicated that the DL-based approach could potentially be used for lung-ventilation estimation.