Dataset Information

Visual Field Inference From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Comparison Between Devices.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To develop a deep learning model to estimate the visual field (VF) from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and to compare the performance between them.

Methods

Two deep learning models based on Inception-ResNet-v2 were trained to estimate 24-2 VF from SS-OCT and SD-OCT images. The estimation performance of the two models was evaluated by using the root mean square error between the actual and estimated VF. The performance was also compared among different glaucoma severities, Garway-Heath sectorizations, and central/peripheral regions.

Results

The training dataset comprised images of 4391 eyes from 2350 subjects, and the test dataset was obtained from another 243 subjects (243 eyes). In all subjects, the global estimation errors were 5.29 ± 2.68 dB (SD-OCT) and 4.51 ± 2.54 dB (SS-OCT), and the estimation error of SS-OCT was significantly lower than that of SD-OCT (P < 0.001). In the analysis of sectors, SS-OCT showed better performance in all sectors except for the inferonasal sector in normal vision and early glaucoma. In advanced glaucoma, the estimation error of the central region was worsened in both OCTs, but SS-OCT was still significantly better in the peripheral region.

Conclusions

Our deep learning model estimated the VF 24-2 better with a wide field image of SS-OCT than did with retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer images of SD-OCT.

Translational relevance

This deep learning method can help clinicians to determine the VF from OCT images. OCT manufacturers can equip this system to provide additional VF data.

SUBMITTER: Shin J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8185404 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceAs currently used, microperimetry is a burdensome clinical testing modality for testing retinal sensitivity requiring long testing times and trained technicians.ObjectiveTo create a deep-learning network that could directly estimate function from structure de novo to provide an en face high-resolution map of estimated retinal sensitivity.Design, setting, and participantsA cross-sectional imaging study using data collected between January 1, 2016, and November 30, 2017, from the Natural History Observation and Registry of macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel) evaluated 38 participants with confirmed MacTel from 2 centers.Main outcomes and measuresMean absolute error of estimated compared with observed retinal sensitivity. Observed retinal sensitivity was obtained with fundus-controlled perimetry (microperimetry). Estimates of retinal sensitivity were made with deep-learning models that learned on superpositions of high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans and microperimetry results. Those predictions were used to create high-density en face sensitivity maps of the macula. Training, validation, and test sets were segregated at the patient level.ResultsA total of 2499 microperimetry sensitivities were mapped onto 1708 OCT B-scans from 63 eyes of 38 patients (mean [SD] age, 74.3 [9.7] years; 15 men [39.5%]). The numbers of examples for our algorithm were 67 899 (103 053 after data augmentation) for training, 1695 for validation, and 1212 for testing. Mean absolute error results were 4.51 dB (95% CI, 4.36-4.65 dB) when using linear regression and 3.66 dB (95% CI, 3.53-3.78 dB) when using the LeNet model. Using a 49.9 million-variable deep-learning model, a mean absolute error of 3.36 dB (95% CI, 3.25-3.48 dB) of retinal sensitivity for validation and test was achieved. Correlation showed a high degree of agreement (Pearson correlation r = 0.78). By paired Wilcoxon rank sum test, our model significantly outperformed these 2 baseline models (P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceHigh-resolution en face maps of estimated retinal sensitivities were created in eyes with MacTel. The maps were of unequalled resolution compared with microperimetry and were able to correctly delineate functionally healthy and impaired retina. This model may be useful to monitor structural and functional disease progression and has potential as an objective surrogate outcome measure in investigational trials.