Dataset Information

Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of LINC00673 in Human Malignancy: A Review and Meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

We conducted this research to investigate the relationship between linc00673 expression and prognosis and clinicopathological parameters in human malignancies.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, WOS and CNKI databases were used to collect eligible research data before January 4, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software. Pooled ORs (odds ratios) or HRs (hazard ratios) and their 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the association of linc00673 expression with survival outcomes and clinical parameters.

Results

We finally included 17 articles and a total of 1539 cases for the meta-analysis. The results indicated that linc00673 was significantly correlated with T stage (P=0.006), tumour stage (P<0.001), lymph node metastasis (P<0.001), and distant metastasis ( P<0.001). In addition, the results suggested that elevated linc00673 expression predicted a poor overall survival time (P=0.034) and acted as an independent prognostic factor (P<0.001) for OS in patients with malignancy. Although potential evidence of publication bias was found in the studies on OS in relation to tumour stage in the multivariate analysis, the trim-and-fill analysis confirmed that the results remained stable.

Conclusion

Overexpression of linc00673 was significantly correlated with shorter OS time in patients with malignant tumours. Moreover, the increased expression level of linc00673 was significantly correlated with T stage, tumour stage, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis. The results presented in this article revealed that linc00673 might be involved in the progression and invasion of malignancy and serve as a novel prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for malignancy.

SUBMITTER: Zhu Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8319490 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe aberrant regulation of MALAT1 has been indicated to be involved in various carcinogenic pathways contributing to the tumourigenesis and progression of cancers. The current meta-analysis summarized the research advances of MALAT1 functions and analyzed its prognostic value among multiple types of cancers.MethodsEligible studies were identified through retrieving the PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI databases, up to Mar 1, 2018. 28 studies of 5436 patients and 36 studies of 3325 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis to evaluate the association of MALAT1 expression with survival outcomes and clinical parameters.ResultsThe results demonstrated that over-expression of MALAT1 may predict lymph node metastasis (pooled OR = 2.335, 95% CI 1.606-3.395, P = 0.000) and distant metastasis (pooled OR = 2.456, 95% CI 1.407-4.286, P = 0.002). Moreover, MALAT1 was also related with tumour size (pooled OR = 1.875, 95% CI 1.257-2.795, P = 0.002) and TNM stage (pooled OR = 2.034, 95% CI 1.111-3.724, P = 0.021). Additionally, elevated MALAT1 expression could predict poor OS (pooled HR = 2.298, 95% CI 1.953-2.704, P = 0.000), DFS (pooled HR = 2.036, 95% CI 1.240-3.342, P = 0.005), RFS (pooled HR = 2.491, 95% CI 1.505-4.123, P = 0.000), DSS (pooled HR = 2.098, 95% CI 1.372-3.211, P = 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR = 1.842, 95% CI 1.138-2.983, P = 0.013) in multivariate model. Importantly, subgroup analyses disclosed that increased MALAT1 expression had a poor OS among different cancer types (Estrogen-dependent cancer: pooled HR = 2.656, 95% CI 1.560-4.523; urological cancer: pooled HR = 1.952, 95% CI 1.189-3.204; glioma: pooled HR = 2.315, 95% CI 1.643-3.263; digestive cancer: pooled HR = 2.451, 95% CI 1.862-3.227).ConclusionsThe present findings demonstrated that MALAT1 may be a novel biomarker for predicting survival outcome, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis.

Project description:Background: Although the treatment of cancer has made evident progress, its morbidity and mortality are still high. A tumor marker is a critical indicator for early cancer diagnosis, and timely cancer detection can efficiently help improve the prognosis of patients. Therefore, it is necessary to identify novel markers associated with cancer. LncRNA myocardial infarction associated transcript (MIAT) is a newly identified tumor marker, and in this study, we aimed to explore the relationship between MIAT and clinicopathological features and patient prognosis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library from inception to September 2020 to identify correlational studies. Then, we extracted valid data and used Stata software to make forest plots. We used the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI to evaluate the relationship between aberrant expression of MIAT and patients' prognosis and clinicopathological features. Results: The study included 21 studies, containing 2,048 patients. Meta-analysis showed that overexpression of lncRNA MIAT was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.60, 95% CI, 1.31-1.96, p < 0.001). In addition, high expression of MIAT could forecast tumor size (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.34-3.81, p = 0.002), distant metastasis (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.84-3.50, p < 0.001), TNM stage (OR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.36-4.18, p = 0.002), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.59, 95% CI 1.25-5.36, p = 0.011), and the degree of differentiation (OR = 2.65, 95% CI 1.54-4.58, p < 0.001). However, other clinicopathological features, including age (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.87-1.32, p = 0.516), gender (OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.77-1.19, p = 0.668), and histology (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.10, p = 0.128) were not significantly different from high expression of MIAT. Conclusions: Our study showed that overexpression of MIAT is related to poor overall survival and clinicopathological features. MIAT can be considered a novel tumor marker to help diagnose tumors earlier and improve patient prognosis.

Project description:Background Numerous studies have reported that abnormally HOXA cluster antisense RNA 2 (HOXA-AS2) expression plays a critical role in various cancers. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic value of HOXA-AS2 in human cancers. Methods Databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data, were searched to retrieve articles on HOXA-AS2 and the prognosis of cancer patients, which were then screened. The association between HOXA-AS2 and overall survival (OS) and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with cancers were assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) combined with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A subgroup analysis and the Begg test were used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed to verify the results, and the potential regulation mechanism of HOXA-AS2 in cancers was revealed by an immune analysis. Results A total of 17 articles, comprising 1,176 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that high HOXA-AS2 expression was associated with worse OS, advanced tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis in cancer patients but was not related to age, sex, or poor histological grade. The results of the analysis of TCGA data further supported our findings. Additionally, the immune analysis revealed that the expression of HOXA-AS2 was associated with immune cell infiltration and various immune checkpoints. Conclusions In summary, our results suggest that the high expression of HOXA-AS2 is associated with poor prognosis and the clinicopathological characteristics of cancer patients; thus, it could serve as a prognosis biomarker and therapeutic target for various cancers. However, the small sample size of this study and the inclusion of participants of a single race might have affected the generalizability of our findings. Thus, large-sample, multicenter studies need to be conducted to further evaluate the prognostic role of HOXA-AS2.

Project description:BackgroundGPRC5A is associated with various cancer initiation and progression. Controversial findings have been reported about GPRC5A prognostic characteristics, and no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the relationship between GPRC5A and cancer prognosis. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the overall prognostic effectiveness of GPRC5A.MethodsWe first conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Cochrane, and WangFang databases. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were then pooled to assess the associations between GPRC5A expression and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event-free survival (EFS), and clinicopathological characteristics. Chi-squared test and I2 statistics were completed to evaluate the heterogeneity in our study. A random-effects model was used when significant heterogeneity existed (I2>50% and p<0.05); otherwise, we chose the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis was stratified by tumor type, region, HR obtained measurements, and sample capacity to explore the source of heterogeneity.ResultsIn total, 15 studies with 624 patients met inclusion criteria of this study. Our results showed that higher expression of GPRC5A is associated with worse OS (HR:1.69 95%CI: 1.20-2.38 I2 = 75.6% p = 0.000), as well as worse EFS (HR:1.45 95%CI: 1.02-1.95 I2 = 0.0% p = 0.354). Subgroup analysis indicated that tumor type might be the source of high heterogeneity. Additionally, cancer patients with enhanced GPRC5A expression were more likely to lymph node metastasis (OR:1.95, 95%CI 1.33-2.86, I2 = 43.9%, p = 0.129) and advanced tumor stage (OR: 1.83, 95%CI 1.15-2.92, I2 = 61.3%, p = 0.035), but not associated with age, sex, differentiation, and distant metastasis.ConclusionGPRC5A can be a promising candidate for predicting medical outcomes and used for accurate diagnosis, prognosis prediction for patients with cancer; however, the predictive value of GPRC5A varies significantly according to cancer type. Further studies for this mechanism will be necessary to reveal novel insights into application of GPRC5A in cancers.

Project description:Objective:To assess the association between MUC expression levels in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and prognosis and investigate the associations between MUC expression levels and CRC clinicopathological characteristics. Methods:The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through September 13, 2019, to identify studies investigating the association between MUC expression levels in CRC tissues and prognosis. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate associations between MUC expression levels and prognosis or clinicopathological characteristics, respectively. The heterogeneity between studies was assessed by the I 2 values, whereas the likelihood of publication bias was assessed by Egger's linear regression and Begg's rank correlation test. Results:Among 33 included studies (n = 6032 patients), there were no associations between combined MUC phenotype expression levels and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS)/relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with CRC. In subgroup analyses, the upregulated MUC1 expression (HR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.29-1.74; P < 0.00001) was associated with poor OS. However, the upregulated MUC2 expression (HR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.79; P < 0.00001) was associated with better OS. Furthermore, a high level of MUC1 expression (HR = 1.99; 95% CI, 0.99-3.99; P = 0.05) was associated with shorter DFS/RFS. However, patients with a low level of MUC2 tumors showed better DFS/RFS than patients with a high level of MUC2 tumors (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.49-1.04; P = 0.08; P = 0.0.009, I 2 = 67%) and MUC5AC expression (HR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.82; P = 0.003) was associated with longer DFS/RFS. In addition, a high level of MUC1 expression was associated with CRC in the rectum, deeper invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, advanced tumor stage, and lymphatic invasion. A high level of MUC2 expression had a protective effect. High secretion of MUC5AC is associated with colon cancer compared with rectal cancer. Conclusion:The protein expression of MUC1 might be a poor biomarker in colorectal cancer and might play a role in tumor transformation and metastasis. However, the protein expression of MUC2 expression might have a protective effect. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of large patients are needed to confirm the results.