Dataset Information

Imaging Patterns Characterizing Mitochondrial Leukodystrophies.

ABSTRACT:

Background and purpose

Achieving a specific diagnosis in leukodystrophies is often difficult due to clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Mitochondrial defects cause 5%-10% of leukodystrophies. Our objective was to define MR imaging features commonly shared by mitochondrial leukodystrophies and to distinguish MR imaging patterns related to specific genetic defects.

Materials and methods

One hundred thirty-two patients with a mitochondrial leukodystrophy with known genetic defects were identified in the data base of the Amsterdam Leukodystrophy Center. Numerous anatomic structures were systematically assessed on brain MR imaging. Additionally, lesion characteristics were scored. Statistical group analysis was performed for 57 MR imaging features by hierarchic testing on clustered genetic subgroups.

Results

MR imaging features indicative of mitochondrial disease that were frequently found included white matter rarefaction (n = 50 patients), well-delineated cysts (n = 20 patients), T2 hyperintensity of the middle blade of the corpus callosum (n = 85 patients), and symmetric abnormalities in deep gray matter structures (n = 42 patients). Several disorders or clusters of disorders had characteristic features. The combination of T2 hyperintensity in the brain stem, middle cerebellar peduncles, and thalami was associated with complex 2 deficiency. Predominantly periventricular localization of T2 hyperintensities and cystic lesions with a distinct border was associated with defects in complexes 3 and 4. T2-hyperintense signal of the cerebellar cortex was specifically associated with variants in the gene NUBPL. T2 hyperintensities predominantly affecting the directly subcortical cerebral white matter, globus pallidus, and substantia nigra were associated with Kearns-Sayre syndrome.

Conclusions

In a large group of patients with a mitochondrial leukodystrophy, general MR imaging features suggestive of mitochondrial disease were found. Additionally, we identified several MR imaging patterns correlating with specific genotypes. Recognition of these patterns facilitates the diagnosis in future patients.

SUBMITTER: Roosendaal SD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8324261 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAs large analyses merge data across sites, a deeper understanding of variance in statistical assessment across the sources of data becomes critical for valid analyses. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) exhibits spatially varying and correlated noise, so care must be taken with distributional assumptions.PurposeWe characterize the role of physiology, subject compliance, and the interaction of subject with the scanner in the understanding of DTI variability, as modeled in spatial variance of derived metrics in homogeneous regions.MethodsWe analyze DTI data from 1035 subjects in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA), with ages ranging from 22.4 to 103 years old. For each subject, up to 12 longitudinal sessions were conducted. We assess variance of DTI scalars within regions of interest (ROIs) defined by four segmentation methods and investigate the relationships between the variance and covariates, including baseline age, time from the baseline (referred to as "interval"), motion, sex, and whether it is the first scan or the second scan in the session.ResultsCovariate effects are heterogeneous and bilaterally symmetric across ROIs. Inter-session interval is positively related (p ≪ 0.001) to FA variance in the cuneus and occipital gyrus, but negatively (p ≪ 0.001) in the caudate nucleus. Males show significantly (p ≪ 0.001) higher FA variance in the right putamen, thalamus, body of the corpus callosum, and cingulate gyrus. In 62 out of 176 ROIs defined by the Eve type-1 atlas, an increase in motion is associated (p < 0.05) with a decrease in FA variance. Head motion increases during the rescan of DTI (Δμ = 0.045 millimeters per volume).ConclusionsThe effects of each covariate on DTI variance, and their relationships across ROIs are complex. Ultimately, we encourage researchers to include estimates of variance when sharing data and consider models of heteroscedasticity in analysis. This work provides a foundation for study planning to account for regional variations in metric variance.