Dataset Information

Complex multimorbidity and mortality in Japan: a prospective propensity-matched cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

There are limitations to defining multimorbidity (MM) based on a simple count of diseases. To address these limitations, the concept of complex MM (CMM) focuses on how many body systems are affected in a single patient, rather than counting comorbid conditions. This study compared the prediction of mortality among older Japanese adults between CMM and conventional MM.

Design

A population-based prospective cohort study.

Setting

The Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study, a nationwide longitudinal cohort study, which ran from 2010 to 2016.

Participants

Functionally independent individuals who were older than 65 and had complete illness data at the time of baseline survey were eligible.

Outcomes measure

CMM was defined as the coexistence of 3 or more body system disorders at baseline. We calculated the propensity for each individual to develop CMM based on a wide array of characteristics, including socioeconomic status and health behaviours. Individuals with and without CMM were then matched on their propensity scores before we estimated overall survival using a log-rank test.

Results

Our 6-year follow-up included 38 889 older adults: 20 233 (52.0%) and 7565 (19.5%) adults with MM and CMM, respectively. In the MM-matched cohort (n=15 666 pairs), the presence of MM was significantly associated with increased mortality (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.14; p=0.02 by the log-rank test). A similar mortality association was found in the CMM-matched cohort (n=7524 pairs, HR, 1.07; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.16; p=0.08 by the log-rank test).

Conclusion

This is the first study to report the association between CMM and mortality among older adults in Japan. MM and CMM predict mortality in older adults to a similar degree. This finding needs to be replicated with more precision in larger samples.

SUBMITTER: Kato D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8330573 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is widely performed all over the world and several randomized controlled trials have been reported. However, the usefulness of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery has not been demonstrated sufficiently, especially for the low rectal area. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that laparoscopic primary tumor resection is safe and effective when compared with the open approach for locally advanced low rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS:Data from patients with clinical stage II to III low rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection were collected and analyzed. The operations were performed from 2010 to 2011. Short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis were analyzed with propensity score matching. RESULTS:Of 1608 cases collated from 69 institutes, 1500 cases were eligible for analysis. The cases were matched into 482 laparoscopic and 482 open cases. The mean height of the tumor from the anal verge was 4.6?cm. Preoperative treatment was performed in 35% of the patients. The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was 5.2%. Estimated blood loss during laparoscopic surgery was significantly less than that during open surgery (90 vs 625?mL, P < 0.001). Overall, the occurrence of complications after laparoscopic surgeries was less than that after open surgeries (30.3% vs 39.2%, P = 0.005). Three-year overall survival rates were 89.9% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 86.7-92.4] and 90.4% (95% CI 87.4-92.8) in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively, and no significant difference was seen between the 2 groups. No significant difference was observed in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the 2 groups (3-year RFS: 70.9%, 68.4 to 74.2 vs 71.8%, 67.5 to 75.7). CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic surgery could be considered as a treatment option for advanced, low rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection, based on the short-term and long-term results of this large cohort study (UMIN-ID: UMIN000013919).