Dataset Information

Does timing matter when initiating elagolix in a natural menstrual cycle?

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of elagolix when administered at different time points in a menstrual cycle.

Design

Clinical case series.

Setting

Academic reproductive endocrinology center.

Patients

Ovulatory women not desiring pregnancy.

Interventions

Six doses of elagolix 200 mg were administered over 4 days, starting at 3 different points in a menstrual cycle: early follicular; late follicular; and midluteal. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P) concentrations were measured at baseline, during elagolix administration, and 1 day after the last dose. Transvaginal ultrasounds were performed to monitor follicle sizes.

Main outcome measures

Serum FSH, LH, E2, and P.

Results

Twelve women, four per group, completed the study. Subjects were 23-42 years of age. Demographics and ovarian reserve parameters were similar among participants. Elagolix suppressed FSH, LH, E2, and P when administered in the early follicular and midluteal phases but had mixed results when administered in the late follicular phase. Two participants demonstrated suppression of all four hormones. One participant ovulated, indicated by an increase in P concentration and development of a corpus luteum. A second participant did not ovulate yet demonstrated an increase in E2 concentration with growth of a dominant follicle. There were no significant differences in median percent change of hormone concentrations across study groups.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that elagolix can suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis when initiated at different points in a menstrual cycle. Optimal dosing and treatment window for consistent hormone suppression have yet to be determined.

Clinical registration number

NCT04060992.

SUBMITTER: Danis RB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8441568 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, with hormonal add-back therapy for up to 12 months in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas.MethodsElaris UF-EXTEND was a phase 3 extension study that evaluated an additional 6 months (up to 12 months total) of elagolix 300 mg twice daily with hormonal add-back therapy (estradiol 1 mg and norethindrone acetate 0.5 mg once daily) in women who completed an initial 6 months of the same treatment in one of two preceding phase 3 studies. The primary endpoint was the percentage of women with both less than 80 mL menstrual blood loss during final month and a 50% or greater reduction in menstrual blood loss from baseline to final month. Safety evaluations included adverse events and bone mineral density changes. The planned sample size of UF-EXTEND was based on estimated rollover and discontinuation rates in the two preceding studies.ResultsFrom September 2016 to March 2019, 433 women were enrolled in UF-EXTEND. Of these women, 218 received up to 12 months of elagolix with add-back therapy; the mean±SD age of this group was 42.4±5.4 years and 67.3% were black. The percentage of women who met the primary endpoint in this elagolix with add-back group was 87.9% (95% CI [83.4-92.3]). The most frequently reported adverse events with up to 12 months of elagolix plus add-back therapy were hot flush (6.9%), night sweats (3.2%), headache (5.5%), and nausea (4.1%). Mean percent decreases in bone mineral density from baseline to extension month 6 were significantly less with elagolix plus add-back therapy than with elagolix alone {between-group difference in lumbar spine: -3.3 (95% CI [-4.1 to -2.5])}.ConclusionUp to 12 months of elagolix with add-back therapy provided sustained reduction in menstrual blood loss in women with uterine leiomyomas, with the addition of add-back therapy attenuating the hypoestrogenic effects of elagolix alone. No new or unexpected safety concerns were associated with an additional 6 months of elagolix with addback therapy.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02925494.Funding sourceAbbVie Inc funded this study.

Project description:Objective: The menstrual cycle may influence vulvodynia through hormonal pathways or vulvar irritation due to menstruation or menstrual hygiene. We assessed menstrual cycle characteristics in those with and without clinically confirmed vulvodynia. Materials and Methods: Participants were recruited from the administrative database of a health care network serving ∼27% of Minneapolis-Saint Paul residents. For 220 clinically confirmed cases and 224 controls, menstrual cycle characteristics were retrospectively assessed at three time points: before age 18, the year before onset of vulvar pain, and 3 months before study participation. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between menstrual characteristics at all three time points and vulvodynia. Models adjusted for prespecified confounders were evaluated against crude effect estimates. Results: Women with heavier menstrual flows had higher odds of vulvodynia compared with women with lighter menstrual flows during their adolescent years (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.91-2.86), the year before onset of vulvar pain (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.10-4.02), and during the 3 months before study participation (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 0.91-3.06). Women with more severe cramps also had higher odds of vulvodynia compared with women with no or mild cramps during their adolescent years (OR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.45-4.15), the year before onset of vulvar pain (OR = 3.30, 95% CI 1.67-6.51), and during the 3 months before study participation (OR = 4.96, 95% CI 1.99-12.36). Women with specific premenstrual symptoms also reported higher odds of vulvodynia. Among those with vulvodynia, half reported a change in vulvar pain across the menstrual cycle, with 60% of these reporting greater pain just before and during menstruation. Furthermore, we observe a trend of decreased tampon use and increased use of sanitary pads as women with vulvodynia moved closer to their date of diagnosis. Conclusions: Menstrual cycle characteristics were associated with vulvodynia, and associations were consistent across different phases of the reproductive life cycle.

Project description:Cyclic fluctuations in hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (HPG-axis) hormones exert powerful behavioral, structural, and functional effects through actions on the mammalian central nervous system. Yet, very little is known about how these fluctuations alter the structural nodes and information highways of the human brain. In a study of 30 naturally cycling women, we employed multidimensional diffusion and T1-weighted imaging during three estimated menstrual cycle phases (menses, ovulation, and mid-luteal) to investigate whether HPG-axis hormone concentrations co-fluctuate with alterations in white matter (WM) microstructure, cortical thickness (CT), and brain volume. Across the whole brain, 17β-estradiol and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were directly proportional to diffusion anisotropy (μFA; 17β-estradiol: β1 = 0.145, highest density interval (HDI) = [0.211, 0.4]; LH: β1 = 0.111, HDI = [0.157, 0.364]), while follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) was directly proportional to CT (β1 = 0 .162, HDI = [0.115, 0.678]). Within several individual regions, FSH and progesterone demonstrated opposing relationships with mean diffusivity (Diso) and CT. These regions mainly reside within the temporal and occipital lobes, with functional implications for the limbic and visual systems. Finally, progesterone was associated with increased tissue (β1 = 0.66, HDI = [0.607, 15.845]) and decreased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF; β1 = -0.749, HDI = [-11.604, -0.903]) volumes, with total brain volume remaining unchanged. These results are the first to report simultaneous brain-wide changes in human WM microstructure and CT coinciding with menstrual cycle-driven hormone rhythms. Effects were observed in both classically known HPG-axis receptor-dense regions (medial temporal lobe, prefrontal cortex) and in other regions located across frontal, occipital, temporal, and parietal lobes. Our results suggest that HPG-axis hormone fluctuations may have significant structural impacts across the entire brain.