Dataset Information

Severe COVID-19 is characterized by the co-occurrence of moderate cytokine inflammation and severe monocyte dysregulation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

SARS-CoV-2 has been responsible for considerable mortality worldwide, owing in particular to pulmonary failures such as ARDS, but also to other visceral failures and secondary infections. Recent progress in the characterization of the immunological mechanisms that result in severe organ injury led to the emergence of two successive hypotheses simultaneously tested here: hyperinflammation with cytokine storm syndrome or dysregulation of protective immunity resulting in immunosuppression and unrestrained viral dissemination.

Methods

In a prospective observational monocentric study of 134 patients, we analysed a panel of plasma inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines and measured monocyte dysregulation via their membrane expression of HLA-DR. We first compared the results of patients with moderate forms hospitalized in an infectious disease unit with those of patients with severe forms hospitalized in an intensive care unit. In the latter group of patients, we then analysed the differences between the surviving and non-surviving groups and between the groups with or without secondary infections.

Findings

Higher blood IL-6 levels, lower quantitative expression of HLA-DR on blood monocytes and higher IL-6/mHLA-DR ratios were statistically associated with the risk of severe forms of the disease and among the latter with death and the early onset of secondary infections.

Interpretation

The unique immunological profile in patients with severe COVID-19 corresponds to a moderate cytokine inflammation associated with severe monocyte dysregulation. Individuals with major CSS were rare in our cohort of hospitalized patients, especially since the use of corticosteroids, but formed a very severe subgroup of the disease.

Funding

None.

SUBMITTER: Bonnet B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8526358 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundInflammation and monocytes are thought to be important to human malaria pathogenesis. However, the relationship of inflammation and various monocyte functions to acute malaria, recovery from acute malaria, and asymptomatic parasitemia in endemic populations is poorly understood.MethodsWe evaluated plasma cytokine levels, monocyte subsets, monocyte functional responses, and monocyte inflammatory transcriptional profiles of 1- to 10-year-old Kenyan children at the time of presentation with acute uncomplicated malaria and at recovery 6 weeks later; these results were compared with analogous data from asymptomatic children and adults in the same community.ResultsAcute malaria was marked by elevated levels of proinflammatory and regulatory cytokines and expansion of the inflammatory "intermediate" monocyte subset that returned to levels of healthy asymptomatic children 6 weeks later. Monocytes displayed activated phenotypes during acute malaria, with changes in surface expression of markers important to innate and adaptive immunity. Functionally, acute malaria monocytes and monocytes from asymptomatic infected children had impaired phagocytosis of P. falciparum-infected erythrocytes relative to asymptomatic children with no blood-stage infection. Monocytes from both acute malaria and recovery time points displayed strong and equivalent cytokine responsiveness to innate immune agonists that were independent of infection status. Monocyte transcriptional profiles revealed regulated and balanced proinflammatory and antiinflammatory and altered phagocytosis gene expression patterns distinct from malaria-naive monocytes.ConclusionThese observations provide insights into monocyte functions and the innate immune response during uncomplicated malaria and suggest that asymptomatic parasitemia in children is not clinically benign.FundingSupport for this work was provided by NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI095192-05), the Burroughs Wellcome Fund/American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, and the Rainbow Babies & Children's Foundation.

Project description:BackgroundThe role of bacterial and viral co-infection in the current COVID-19 pandemic remains elusive. The aim of this study was to describe the rates and features of co-infection on admission of COVID-19 patients, based on molecular and routine laboratory methods.MethodsA retrospective study of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients undergoing Biofire®, FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel, bioMérieux, and routine cultures during the first 3 days from admission, between June 2019 and March 2021.ResultsFilmArray tests were performed in 115 COVID-19 and in 61 non-COVID-19 patients. Most (>99%) COVID-19 patients had moderate-critical illness, 37% required mechanical ventilation. Sputa and endotracheal aspirates were the main samples analyzed. Positive FilmArray tests were found in 60% (70/116) of the tests amongst COVID-19 patients and 62.5% (40/64) amongst non-COVID-19 patients. All 70 cases were positive for bacterial targets, while one concomitant virus (Rhinovirus/Enterovirus) and one Legionella spp. were detected. The most common bacterial targets were Haemophilus influenzae (36%), Staphylococcus aureus (23%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (10%) and Enterobacter cloacae (10%). Correlation between FilmArray and cultures was found in 81% and 44% of negative and positive FA tests, respectively. Positive FilmArray results typically (81%) triggered the administration of antibiotic therapy and negative results resulted in antimicrobials to be withheld in 56% of cases and stopped in 8%. Bacterial cultures of COVID-19 patients were positive in 30/88 (34%) of cases.ConclusionsBacterial co-infection is common amongst moderate-critical COVID-19 patients on admission while viral and atypical bacteria were exceedingly rare. Positive FilmArray results could trigger potentially unnecessary antibiotic treatment.KEY POINTWe found high rates of on-admission bacterial co-infection amongst hospitalized moderate to severe COVID-19 patients. Molecular tests (Biofire, FilmArray) and routine microbiological tests revealed 60% and 34% bacterial co-infection, respectively, while viral and fungal co-infections were rare.