Dataset Information

Open Characterization of Vaping Liquids in Canada: Chemical Profiles and Trends

ABSTRACT: Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive data on the diversity of chemicals present in vaping liquids. To address this gap, a non-targeted analysis of 825 vaping liquids collected between 2017 and 2019 from Canadian retailers was conducted. Prior to mass spectrometry analysis, samples were diluted 1:500 v/v with methanol or acetonitrile. Chemical compound separation and analysis was carried out using gas chromatography and triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) systems operated in the full scan mode and mass range of 35–450 m/z. Mass spectrum for each sample was obtained in electron ionization at 70 eV and processed. Non-targeted identification workflow included use of automated mass spectral deconvolution and identification system (AMDIS), where required, as well as a number of commercially available spectral libraries. In order to validate identities, an in-house database of expected compounds previously detected in vaping liquids was used along with genuine analytical standards for compounds of interest. This resulted in a dataset of over 1,500 unique detected chemicals. Approximately half of these chemical compounds were detected only once in a single product and not in multiple products analyzed. For any sample analyzed, on average, 40% of the chemical constituents appeared to have flavouring properties. The remainder were nicotine and related alkaloids, processing, degradation or indirect additives, natural extractives and compounds with unknown roles. Data published here from the project on the Open Characterization of vaping liquids is unique as it offers a detailed understanding of products’ flavour chemical profiles, the presence and frequency of chemicals of potential health concern, as well as trends and changes in products’ chemical complexity over a three-year period. Non-targeted chemical surveillance such as this present valuable tools to public health officials and researchers in responding to emergent issues such as vaping associated lung injury or informing chemical based strategies which may be aimed at addressing product safety or appeal.

SUBMITTER: Kosarac I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8551961 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes, vaping products) have become increasingly popular, with recent increases in use associated with closed systems delivering higher concentrations of nicotine. Most vaping products designed as an alternative to combustible cigarettes contain nicotine. A number of published studies have examined the reported concentrations of nicotine in vaping liquids (e-liquids) and found discrepancies between labelled and measured levels. Some discrepancy can also be explained by the lack of stability of nicotine in these types of products. Recently, a chemical analysis method for the quantitative determination of low and high levels of nicotine in vaping liquids was developed. This method uses dilution with acetonitrile prior to analysis with gas chromatograph mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in single ion monitoring mode (SIM). The developed method was validated using a laboratory-prepared vaping liquid as well as commercially available, nicotine-free products fortified with nicotine in the laboratory. The method detection limit (MDL) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) for nicotine were calculated to be 0.002 mg/mL and 0.006 mg/mL, respectively. The newly developed method was applied to quantify nicotine in commercially available vaping liquids of various flavour profiles and across a wide range of nicotine concentrations, including those with nicotine salts. Furthermore, a subset of vaping liquids were analyzed to elucidate nicotine stability in various product subtypes. After a period of six months of accelerated storage to mimic one year, the overall mean percent of the original nicotine concentration remaining in the salt-based vaping products was 85% (minimum 64%, maximum 99%) while in the free-base nicotine products it was 74% (minimum 31%, maximum 106%). Nicotine stability in vaping liquids was found to be influenced by the nicotine form (pH) of formulation and its chemical composition. Non-targeted, qualitative analysis of chemical composition of vaping products showed that most constituents were identified and found to be remaining in the products following stability trials; however, three new compounds were tentatively identified in some vaping liquids at the end of the stability trials. Stability studies and the accurate quantitation of nicotine in vaping products can help inform product standards related to the safety, quality and utility of vaping products as a smoking cessation tool.

Project description:Nicotine salt-based e-liquids deliver nicotine more rapidly and efficiently to electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) users than freebase nicotine formulations. Nicotine salt-based products represent a substantial majority of the United States ENDS market. Despite the popularity of nicotine salt formulations, the chemical and physical characteristics of aerosols produced by nicotine salt e-liquids are still not well understood. To address this, this study reports the harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) and particle sizes of aerosols produced by laboratory-made freebase nicotine and nicotine salt e-liquids. The nicotine salt e-liquids were formulated with benzoic acid, citric acid, lactic acid, malic acid, or oxalic acid. The nicotine salt aerosols had different HPHC profiles than the freebase nicotine aerosols, indicating that the carboxylic acids were not innocent bystanders. The polycarboxylic acid e-liquids containing citric acid, malic acid, or oxalic acid produced higher acrolein yields than the monocarboxylic acid e-liquids containing benzoic acid or lactic acid. Across most PG:VG ratios, nicotine benzoate or nicotine lactate aerosols contained the highest nicotine quantities (in %) and the highest nicotine yields (per milligram of aerosol). Additionally, the nicotine benzoate and nicotine lactate e-liquids produced the highest carboxylic acid yields under all tested conditions. The lower acid yields of the citric, malic, and oxalic acid formulations are potentially due to a combination of factors such as lower transfer efficiencies, lower thermostabilities, and greater susceptibility to side reactions because of their additional carboxyl groups serving as new sites for reactivity. For all nicotine formulations, the particle size characteristics were primarily controlled by the e-liquid solvent ratios, and there were no clear trends between nicotine salt and freebase nicotine aerosols that indicated nicotine protonation affected particle size. The carboxylic acids impacted aerosol output, nicotine delivery, and HPHC yields in distinct ways such that interchanging them in ENDS can potentially cause downstream effects.

Dataset Information

Open Characterization of Vaping Liquids in Canada: Chemical Profiles and Trends

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets