Dataset Information

Quantifying Patient-Specific in vivo Coronary Plaque Material Properties for Accurate Stress/Strain Calculations: An IVUS-Based Multi-Patient Study

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Mechanical forces are closely associated with plaque progression and rupture. Precise quantifications of biomechanical conditions using in vivo image-based computational models depend heavily on the accurate estimation of patient-specific plaque mechanical properties. Currently, mechanical experiments are commonly performed on ex vivo cardiovascular tissues to determine plaque material properties. Patient-specific in vivo coronary material properties are scarce in the existing literature. Methods:In vivo Cine intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) slices were acquired at 20 plaque sites from 13 patients. A three-dimensional thin-slice structure-only model was constructed for each slice to obtain patient-specific in vivo material parameter values following an iterative scheme. Effective Young's modulus (YM) was calculated to indicate plaque stiffness for easy comparison purposes. IVUS-based 3D thin-slice models using in vivo and ex vivo material properties were constructed to investigate their impacts on plaque wall stress/strain (PWS/PWSn) calculations. Results: The average YM values in the axial and circumferential directions for the 20 plaque slices were 599.5 and 1,042.8 kPa, respectively, 36.1% lower than those from published ex vivo data. The YM values in the circumferential direction of the softest and stiffest plaques were 103.4 and 2,317.3 kPa, respectively. The relative difference of mean PWSn on lumen using the in vivo and ex vivo material properties could be as high as 431%, while the relative difference of mean PWS was much lower, about 3.07% on average. Conclusion: There is a large inter-patient and intra-patient variability in the in vivo plaque material properties. In vivo material properties have a great impact on plaque stress/strain calculations. In vivo plaque material properties have a greater impact on strain calculations. Large-scale-patient studies are needed to further verify our findings.

SUBMITTER: Wang L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8575450 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling of atherosclerotic plaque is challenging, as there is limited information available clinically to characterize plaque components. This study proposes that for the limited data available in vivo, material properties of plaque and artery can be identified using inverse FE analysis and either a simple neo-Hookean constitutive model or assuming linear elasticity provides sufficient accuracy to capture the changes in vessel deformation, which is the available clinical metric. To test this, 10 human cadaveric femoral arteries were each pressurized ex vivo at 6 pressure levels, while intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and virtual histology (VH) imaging were performed during controlled pull-back to determine vessel geometry and plaque structure. The VH images were then utilized to construct FE models with heterogeneous material properties corresponding to the vessel plaque components. The constitutive models were then fit to each plaque component by minimizing the difference between the experimental and the simulated geometry using the inverse FE method. Additionally, we further simplified the analysis by assuming the vessel wall had a homogeneous structure, i.e. lumping artery and plaque as one tissue. We found that for the heterogeneous wall structure, the simulated and experimental vessel geometries compared well when the fitted neo-Hookean parameters or elastic modulus, in the case of linear elasticity, were utilized. Furthermore, taking the median of these fitted parameters then inputting these as plaque component mechanical properties in the finite element simulation yielded differences between simulated and experimental geometries that were on average around 2% greater (1.30-5.55% error range to 2.33-11.71% error range). For the homogeneous wall structure the simulated and experimental wall geometries had an average difference of around 4% although when the difference was calculated using the median fitted value this difference was larger than for the heterogeneous fits. Finally, comparison to uniaxial tension data and to literature constitutive models also gave confidence to the suitability of this simplified approach for patient-specific arterial simulation based on data that may be acquired in the clinic.

Dataset Information

Quantifying Patient-Specific in vivo Coronary Plaque Material Properties for Accurate Stress/Strain Calculations: An IVUS-Based Multi-Patient Study

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets