Dataset Information

Performance Evaluation of the Glunovo® Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Participants with Diabetes: A Multicenter, Self-Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

The present study was aimed to evaluate the performance and safety of the Glunovo® real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in monitoring interstitial fluid glucose in adult participants with diabetes (at least 18 years old) using venous blood glucose as control.

Methods

This was a multicenter, self-controlled clinical trial, conducted in participants with diabetes from China, between March 2019 to October 2019. The CGMS was used by all the participants for a 14-day wear-in period. The real-time glucose values measured by Glunovo® CGMS were compared with venous blood glucose values measured by the Entwicklung, Konstruktion und Fertigung (EKF) blood glucose detector. The primary outcomes were the consistency rate of CGMS readings and venous blood glucose values (20/20% standard).

Results

A total of 78 participants (41 men, 37 women) and 156 CGMS sensors were included in the study. Among the included participants, 25 and 53 participants had type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively, with median age of 52.50 years (range 32-62 years). The overall agreement rate (20/20%) was 89.71% (95% CI 89.18-90.24%). It was observed that 99.08% (95% CI 98.91-99.24%) and 99.82% (95% CI 99.74-99.89%) of the measuring points fell within the A + B zones of the Clarke error grid analysis and Parkes/consensus error grid analysis, respectively. The mean absolute relative difference was 10.30% ± 4.86%. The probability of a glucose measurement falling within a range, when stratified by venous glucose measurements, ranged from 7.14% for 19.44-22.22 mmol/L to 79.21% for 4.44-6.67 mmol/L. There were 73 (41.24%) and 27 (57.45%) successful CGMS alarms for hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events, respectively.

Conclusion

From the results, Glunovo® CGMS had excellent accuracy and limited clinical risk compared with venous blood glucose in the range of 2.2-22.2 mmol/L over 14 days.

SUBMITTER: Meng R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8586329 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveSince there is a paucity of reference data in the literature to indicate the relationship between HbA1c, and 24 h mean blood glucose (MBG) from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in Chinese populations, we described the above relationship in adult Chinese subjects with different glucose tolerance status.MethodsSeven-hundred-and-forty-two individuals without history of diabetes were included to the study at 11 hospitals in urban areas across China from 2007-2009 and data of 673 subjects were included into the final analysis. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) classified the participants as nondiabetic subjects, including those with normal glucose regulation (NGR; n?=?121) and impaired glucose regulation (IGR; n?=?209), or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (n?=?343). All participants completed testing for HbA1c levels and wore a CGM system for three consecutive days. The 24 h MBG levels were calculated. Spearman correlations and linear regression analyses were applied to quantify the relationship between glucose markers.ResultsThe levels of HbA1c and 24 h MBG significantly increased with presence of glucose intolerance (NGR<IGR<type 2 diabetes; both, P<0.001). Analysis of the total population indicated that HbA1c was strongly correlated with 24 h MBG (r?=?0.735). The correlation was also found to be significant for the subgroup of participants with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (r?=?0.694, P<0.001). Linear regression analysis of the total study population yielded the following equation: 24 h MBG(mmol/L?)=?1.198×HbA1c-0.582 (24 h MBG(mg/dL?)=?21.564×HbA1c-10.476) (R(2)=?0.670, P<0.001). The model fit was not improved by application of exponential or quadratic modeling. When HbA1c was 6.5%, the calculated 24 h MBG was 7.2 (6.4-8.1) mmol/L (130 (115-146) mg/dL); and when HbA1c was 7.0%, the 24 h MBG was 7.8 (6.9-8.7) mmol/L (140 (124-157) mg/dL).ConclusionsOur study provided the reference data of the relationship between HbA1c and CGM in Chinese subjects.