Dataset Information

Branching clonal evolution patterns predominate mutational landscape in multiple myeloma.

ABSTRACT: Multiple Myeloma (MM) arises from malignant transformation and deregulated proliferation of clonal plasma cells (PCs) harbouring heterogeneous molecular anomalies. The effect of evolving mutations on clone fitness and their cellular prevalence shapes the progressing myeloma genome and impacts clinical outcomes. Although clonal heterogeneity in MM is well established, which subclonal mutations emerge/persist/perish with progression in MM and which of these can be targeted therapeutically remains an open question. In line with this, we have sequenced pairwise whole exomes of 62 MM patients collected at two time points, i.e., at diagnosis and on progression. Somatic variants were called using a novel ensemble approach where a consensus was deduced from four variant callers (Illumina's Dragen, Strelka2, SomaticSniper and SpeedSeq) and actionable/druggable gene targets were identified. A marked intraclonal heterogeneity was observed. Branching evolution was observed among 72.58% patients, of whom 64.51% had low TMBs (<10) and 61.29% had 2 or more founder clones. The hypermutator patients (with high TMB levels ≥10 to ≤100) showed a significant decrease in their TMBs from diagnosis (median TMB 77.11) to progression (median TMB 31.22). A distinct temporal fall in subclonal driver mutations was identified recurrently across diagnosis to progression e.g., in PABPC1, BRAF, KRAS, CR1, DIS3 and ATM genes in 3 or more patients suggesting such patients could be treated early with target specific drugs like Vemurafenib/Cobimetinib. An analogous rise in driver mutations was observed in KMT2C, FOXD4L1, SP140, NRAS and other genes. A few drivers such as FAT4, IGLL5 and CDKN1A retained consistent distribution patterns at two time points. These findings are clinically relevant and point at consideration of evaluating multi time point subclonal mutational landscapes for designing better risk stratification strategies and tailoring time to time risk adapted combination therapies in future.

SUBMITTER: Farswan A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8640818 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Tumor heterogeneity results in more than 50% of hypermutated cancers failing to respond to standard immunotherapy. There are numerous challenges in terms of drug resistance, therapeutic strategies, and biomarkers in immunotherapy. In this study, we analyzed primary tumor samples from 533 cancer patients with six different cancer types using deep targeted sequencing and gene expression data from 78 colorectal cancer patients, whereby driver mutations, mutational signatures, tumor-associated neoantigens, and molecular cancer evolution were investigated. Driver mutations, including RET, CBL, and DDR2 gene mutations, were identified in the hypermutated cancers. Most hypermutated endometrial and pancreatic cancer patients carry genetic mutations in EGFR, FBXW7, and PIK3CA that are linked to immunotherapy resistance, while hypermutated head and neck cancer patients carry genetic mutations associated with better treatment responses, such as ATM and BRRCA2 mutations. APOBEC (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like) and DNA repair defects are mutational drivers that are signatures for hypermutated cancer. Cancer driver mutations and other mutational signatures are associated with sensitivity or resistance to immunotherapy, representing potential genetic markers in hypermutated cancers. Using computational prediction, we identified NF1 p.T700I and NOTCH1 p.V2153M as tumor-associated neoantigens, representing potential therapeutic targets for immunotherapy. Sequential mutations were used to predict hypermutated cancers based on genomic evolution. Using a logistic model, we achieved an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.93, accuracy = 0.93, and sensitivity = 0.81 in the testing set. The sequential patterns were distinct among the six cancer types, and the sequential mutation order of MSH2 and the coexisting BRAF genetic mutations influenced the hypermutated phenotype. The TP53~MLH1 and NOTCH1~TET2 sequential mutations impacted colorectal cancer survival (p-value = 0.027 and 0.0001, respectively) by reducing the expression of PTPRCAP (p-value = 1.06 × 10-6) and NOS2 (p-value = 7.57 × 10-7) in immunity. Sequential mutations are significant for hypermutated cancers, which are characterized by mutational heterogeneity. In addition to driver mutations and mutational signatures, sequential mutations in cancer evolution can impact hypermutated cancers. They characterize potential responses or predictive markers for hypermutated cancers. These data can also be used to develop hypermutation-associated drug targets and elucidate the evolutionary biology of cancer survival. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of mutational patterns, including sequential mutations, and identified useful markers and therapeutic targets in hypermutated cancer patients.

Dataset Information

Branching clonal evolution patterns predominate mutational landscape in multiple myeloma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets