Dataset Information

Predictive value of different bilirubin subtypes for clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving thrombolysis therapy.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

To explore the association of total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL), and indirect bilirubin (IBIL) levels with, as well as the incremental predictive value of different bilirubin subtypes for, poor outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients after thrombolysis.

Methods

We analyzed 588 individuals out of 718 AIS participants, and all patients were followed up at 3 months after thrombolysis. The primary outcome was 3-month death and major disability (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 3-6). The secondary outcomes were 3-month mortality (mRS score of 6), moderate-severe cerebral edema, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), respectively.

Results

Elevated DBIL pre-thrombolysis was associated with an increased risk of primary outcome (OR 3.228; 95% CI 1.595-6.535; p for trend = 0.014) after fully adjustment. Elevated TBIL pre-thrombolysis showed the similar results (OR 2.185; 95% CI 1.111-4.298; p for trend = 0.047), while IBIL pre-thrombolysis was not significantly associated with primary outcome (OR 1.895; 95% CI 0.974-3.687; p for trend = 0.090). Multivariable-adjusted spline regression model showed a positive linear dose-response relationship between DBIL pre-thrombolysis and risk of primary outcome (p for linearity = 0.004). Adding DBIL pre-thrombolysis into conventional model had greater incremental predictive value for primary outcome, with net reclassification improvement (NRI) 95% CI = 0.275 (0.084-0.466) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) 95% CI = 0.011 (0.001-0.024). Increased DBIL post-thrombolysis had an association with primary outcome (OR 2.416; 95%CI 1.184-4.930; p for trend = 0.039), and it also elevated the incremental predictive value for primary outcome, with NRI (95% CI) = 0.259 (0.066-0.453) and IDI (95% CI) = 0.025 (0.008-0.043).

Conclusion

Increased DBIL pre-thrombolysis had a stronger association with, as well as greater incremental predictive value for, poor outcomes than TBIL and IBIL did in AIS patients after thrombolysis, which should be understood in the context of retrospective design. The effect of DBIL on targeted populations should be investigated in further researches.

SUBMITTER: Peng Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8739039 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Tenecteplase is a fibrinolytic drug with higher fibrin specificity and longer half-life than the standard stroke thrombolytic, alteplase, permitting the convenience of single bolus administration. Tenecteplase, at 0.5 mg/kg, has regulatory approval to treat ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, for which it has equivalent 30-day mortality and fewer systemic hemorrhages. Investigated as a thrombolytic for ischemic stroke over the past 15 years, tenecteplase is currently being studied in several phase 3 trials. Based on a systematic literature search, we provide a qualitative synthesis of published stroke clinical trials of tenecteplase that (1) performed randomized comparisons with alteplase, (2) compared different doses of tenecteplase, or (3) provided unique quantitative meta-analyses. Four phase 2 and one phase 3 study performed randomized comparisons with alteplase. These and other phase 2 studies compared different tenecteplase doses and effects on early outcomes of recanalization, reperfusion, and substantial neurological improvement, as well as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month disability on the modified Rankin Scale. Although no single trial prospectively demonstrated superiority or noninferiority of tenecteplase on clinical outcome, meta-analyses of these trials (1585 patients randomized) point to tenecteplase superiority in recanalization of large vessel occlusions and noninferiority in disability-free 3-month outcome, without increases in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or mortality. Doses of 0.25 and 0.4 mg/kg have been tested, but no advantage of the higher dose has been suggested by the results. Current clinical practice guidelines for stroke include intravenous tenecteplase at either dose as a second-tier option, with the 0.25 mg/kg dose recommended for large vessel occlusions, based on a phase 2 trial that demonstrated superior recanalization and improved 3-month outcome relative to alteplase. Ongoing randomized phase 3 trials may better define the comparative risks and benefits of tenecteplase and alteplase for stroke thrombolysis and answer questions of tenecteplase efficacy in the >4.5-hour time window, in wake-up stroke, and in combination with endovascular thrombectomy.

Project description:Background:The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the potential correlation between clinical outcomes and homocysteine (Hcy) levels in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients after recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) treatment. Methods:AIS patients treated by rtPA were enrolled between September 2018 and March 2019 in the Stroke Center (Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery), Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine. Demographics, baseline and clinical characteristics, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score after three months from the onset were retrospectively analyzed. Then we compared data about demographics, baseline and clinical characteristics between patients with favorable (mRS score 0-2) and unfavorable (mRS score 3-6) outcomes. Results:Among 141 patients, 36 patients had poor outcome, for an incidence of 25.53%. Univariate analysis showed that higher Hcy levels (OR = 1.07, 95% CI [1.02-1.12]), older age (OR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.02-1.10]), longer door to needle time (DNT) (OR = 1.03, 95% CI [1.01-1.05]), higher D-Dimer levels (OR = 1.33, 95% CI [1.03-1.71]), and higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score before treatment (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.08-1.35]) were each associated with poor outcome. Also, without internal carotid artery plaque (OR = 0.30, 95% CI [0.10-0.92]) showed a protective effect on patients' clinical outcome. Patients with higher levels of Hcy decline also showed an increased risk of poor outcome for AIS patients obtaining rtPA treatment (Non-adjusted: OR = 1.07, 95% CI [1.02-1.12]; Adjust model I adjusts for demographics (age, male): OR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.02-1.11]; Adjust model II adjusts for hospital care factors (onset to treatment, DNT): OR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.03-1.13]; Adjust model III adjusts for health and stroke factors (INR, D-Dimer, HGB, NIHSS score before treatment, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, coronary disease, hyperlipidemia, previous stroke, atrial fibrillation, hemorrhagic transformation, internal carotid artery plaque): OR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.02-1.11]). The results are very stable in all three models constructed. Conclusion:The results of this study indicate that increased Hcy level independently predicts unfavorable outcome in AIS patients accepting thrombolytic therapy. However, the contribution of Hcy to the outcome, although significant, is relatively small and perhaps not clinically significant when all the other confounders are considered.

Project description:Background: Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase benefits eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, in some countries such as China, alteplase may be too expensive for low-income patients, and also for regions with low economic development. Urokinase is much less expensive than alteplase. This study aimed to assess the outcomes and treatment complications of urokinase in acute ischemic stroke patients, which are poorly understood. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included acute ischemic stroke patients who received intravenous urokinase or alteplase from January 2014 to January 2018 at 21 centers in China. Outcomes and treatment complications were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Among the 618 patients included in this study, 489 were treated with urokinase and 129 were treated with alteplase. Functional independence, no/minimal disability, mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and symptomatic ICH did not significantly differ between the urokinase and alteplase groups in the univariate and multivariate analyses. However, the patients who received alteplase had a lower odds ratio (OR) of extracranial bleeding in the univariate analysis and a lower adjusted OR (aOR) in the multivariate analysis than the patients who received urokinase (OR = 0.410 [95% CI, 0.172-0.977], p = 0.038; aOR = 0.350 [95% CI, 0.144-0.854], p = 0.021). Furthermore, in patients treated with urokinase, the patients who received high-dose urokinase had a higher OR of extracranial bleeding in the univariate analysis and a higher aOR of extracranial bleeding in the multivariate analysis than patients who received low-dose urokinase (OR = 3.046 [95% CI, 1.696-5.470], p < 0.001; aOR = 3.074 [95% CI, 1.627-5.807], p = 0.001). Moreover, patients who received low-dose urokinase had similar outcomes and complications compared to patients treated with alteplase. Conclusions: Patients treated with urokinase had similar outcomes but a higher risk of extracranial bleeding compared to patients treated with alteplase. The risk of extracranial bleeding was higher in the patients treated with high-dose urokinase than in the patients treated with low-dose urokinase. Patients who received low-dose urokinase had similar outcomes and complications compared to patients treated with alteplase. In countries such as China where some acute ischemic stroke patients cannot afford alteplase, urokinase may be a good alternative to alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis.