Dataset Information

OX40L Inhibition Suppresses KLH-driven Immune Responses in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized Controlled Trial Demonstrating Proof-of-Pharmacology for KY1005.

ABSTRACT: The safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of an anti-OX40L monoclonal antibody (KY1005, currently amlitelimab) were evaluated. Pharmacodynamic (PD) effects were explored using keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and tetanus toxoid (TT) immunizations. Sixty-four healthy male subjects (26.5 ± 6.0 years) were randomized to single doses of 0.006, 0.018, or 0.05 mg/kg, or multiple doses of 0.15, 0.45, 1.35, 4, or 12 mg/kg KY1005, or placebo (6:2). Serum KY1005 concentrations were measured. Antibody responses upon KLH and TT immunizations and skin response upon intradermal KLH administration were performed. PD data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of covariances (ANCOVAs) and post hoc exposure-response modeling. No serious adverse events occurred and all adverse events were temporary and of mild or moderate severity. A nonlinear increase in mean serum KY1005 concentrations was observed (median time to maximum concentration (T_max ) ~ 4 hours, geometric mean terminal half-life (t½) ~ 24 days). Cutaneous blood perfusion (estimated difference (ED) -13.4 arbitrary unit (AU), 95% confidence interval (CI) -23.0 AU to -3.8 AU) and erythema quantified as average redness (ED -0.23 AU, 95% CI -0.35 AU to -0.11 AU) decreased after KY1005 treatment at doses of 0.45 mg/kg and above. Exposure-response analysis displayed a statistically significant treatment effect on anti-KLH antibody titers (IgG maximum effect (E_max ) -0.58 AU, 95% CI -1.10 AU to -0.06 AU) and skin response (erythema E_max -0.20 AU, 95% CI -0.29 AU to -0.11 AU). Administration of KY1005 demonstrated an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and PK analyses displayed a nonlinear profile of KY1005. Despite the observed variability, skin challenge response after KY1005 treatment indicated pharmacological activity of KY1005. Therefore, KY1005 shows potential as a novel pharmacological treatment in immune-mediated disorders.

SUBMITTER: Saghari M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9314635 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:(1) Background: Studies have reported the effectiveness of light therapy in various medical conditions. Our pilot study aimed to assess the effect of Maharishi light therapy (MLT) on physiological parameters, such as the heart rate (HR), HR variability (HRV), blood pressure (BP), BP variability (BPV), and the retinal microvasculature of healthy participants; (2) Methodology: Thirty (14 males and 16 females) healthy, non-smoking participants between 23 and 71 years old (46 ± 18 years) were included in this randomized crossover study. Each participant was tested with a placebo (using LED light) and gem lights, 24 h apart. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded during the session, and 24 h heart rate and BP levels were assessed via mobile devices. Retinal vascular responses were captured with fundus images and the subsequent analysis of retinal vessel widths. A linear model, using repeated measures ANOVA, was used to compare the responses across the sexes and to assess the effect of the MLT; (3) Results: Changes in the central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) (p < 0.001) and central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE) (p = 0.002) parameters were observed. CRAE and CRVE decreased under MLT and increased under the placebo condition from before to after. However, the baseline values of the participants already differed significantly before the application of any therapy, and the variation in the retinal vessel diameters was already large in the baseline measurements. This suggests that the observed effect results may only reflect naturally occurring fluctuations in the microcirculation and not the effect of MLT. Furthermore, no significant effects were observed in any other investigated parameters; (4) Conclusion: Our study with healthy participants finds significant changes in retinal parameters, but the biological variation in the baseline measurements was large to begin with. This suggests that the observed effect results only reflect naturally occurring fluctuations in the microcirculation and not the effect of MLT. However, in the future, larger studies in which MLT is applied for longer periods and/or in patients with different diseases could discover the physiological impacts of this type of therapy.

Project description:BackgroundThe offset of a painful and unpleasant sensation can elicit pleasure. This phenomenon, namely pleasant pain relief (PPR), is attracting growing interest in research. While the cold pressor test (CPT) has been frequently used to study the inhibition of pain by the administration of another painful stimulation (inhibitory conditioned pain modulation; ICPM), a preliminary study from our research team has shown that CPT can also elicit a robust and long-lasting PPR. However, its effects on pain relief and inhibition vary greatly between subjects. Although substantial research has been carried out on inter-individual variability in the case of ICPM, the same cannot be said of PPR. Therefore, the current study sought to identify clusters of healthy volunteers with similar dynamic pain responses during the CPT, using a data-driven approach, and to investigate the inter-subject variability for PPR and ICPM.MethodsOne hundred and twenty-two healthy volunteers were recruited. A sequential ICPM paradigm was carried out with CPT (water at 10°C) and a Peltier Thermode to evaluate pain intensity and unpleasantness. Moreover, PPR was measured for four minutes at CPT offset. Statistical analyses were performed using group-based trajectory modelling.ResultsFour trajectories (groups) were identified for CPT pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings with varying levels of tonic pain and pain sensitization (e.g., temporal summation). PPR scores were correlated with both pain ratings trajectories (p < 0.001). On the other hand, no differences were found between groups regarding ICPM efficacy (percentage pain inhibition).DiscussionThis study has provided a first step into the investigation of PPR and ICPM interindividual variability. Using a data-driven approach, it was shown that PPR at CPT offset differs between clusters of participants identified based on dynamic pain intensity and unpleasantness responses from CPT. Thus, it was brought to light that both the levels of tonic pain and pain sensitization underlie individual differences in PPR. The lack of correlation between CPT pain trajectories and ICPM efficacy may be explained by the hypotheses that eliciting ICPM requires only a certain threshold of stimulation which doesn't need to be noxious. In the future, studies on the inter-subject variability of PPR in large samples of chronic pain patients are warranted.

Dataset Information

OX40L Inhibition Suppresses KLH-driven Immune Responses in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized Controlled Trial Demonstrating Proof-of-Pharmacology for KY1005.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets