Dataset Information

Effect of Hearing Protection Use on Pianists’ Performance and Experience: Comparing Foam and Musician Earplugs

ABSTRACT: Professional musicians are often exposed to high noise levels and thus face the risk of noise-induced hearing loss. Yet, adoption rates for hearing protection among musicians are low. Previous surveys indicate that the chief concern is the effect of hearing protection use on performance. However, few studies have investigated actual changes in performance when wearing hearing protection. We report an experiment investigating differences in pianists’ performance and experience with and without hearing protection. We compare the effect of foam earplugs and musician earplugs, designed to preserve sound quality with a flat frequency response. The analysis revealed that participants performed overall more loudly with the foam earplugs than with the musician earplugs, and in turn performances with the musician earplugs were louder than the open condition, indicating a compensatory effect. However, this effect was stronger for novel excerpts than for familiar excerpts. No effect was observed on dynamic range. Furthermore, we observed an acclimatization effect, whereby the effect of hearing protection use, observed on the first performance, decreased on the second performance. In terms of experience, participants reported changes in coloration, difficulties gauging dynamics and articulation, and increased effort required when performing with hearing protection. These effects were more pronounced when wearing the foam earplugs, and the participants reported finding the musician earplugs more comfortable to wear and play with. In conclusion, hearing protection use affects pianists’ performance particularly in terms of dynamics and their experience more so in terms of coloration. But the effects are less marked for familiar pieces and after repetition, suggesting that pianists can quickly adjust their playing when playing familiar pieces with hearing protection.

SUBMITTER: Boissinot E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9315358 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:In recent years, studies conducted on foam stabilization have focused on nanoparticles by generating strong adsorption at the interface to stabilize the foam under harsh reservoir conditions. Meanwhile, the selection of a gas source is also of great importance for foam performance. In this study, a mixed system of surfactants was selected, and the foamability and foam stability of nitrogen and methane were evaluated according to the improved jet method. After adding modified SiO2 nanoparticles, the foam-related parameters were analyzed. The plugging abilities of the different foams were compared through core-flooding experiments, and the oil displacement effects of the different foams were compared through microfluidic experiments. The results show that the amphoteric surfactant betaine has an excellent synergistic effect on the anionic surfactant SDS. The methane foam produced using the jet method has a larger initial volume than the nitrogen foam, but its stability is poor. The half-life of the nitrogen foam is about two times that of the methane foam. After adding 1.0 wt % SiO2 nanoparticles to the surfactant solution, the viscosity and stability of the formed foam improve. However, the maximum viscosity of the surfactant nanoparticle foam (surfactant-NP foam) is 53 mPa·s higher than that of the surfactant foam. In the core-flooding experiment, the plugging performance of the methane foam was worse than that of the nitrogen foam, and in the microfluidic experiment, the oil displacement abilities of the methane foam and the nitrogen foam were similar. The plugging performance and the oil displacement effect of the foam are greatly improved by adding nanoparticles. The surfactant-NP foam flooding has a better oil displacement effect and can enhance the recovery factor by more than 30%. Under actual high-pressure reservoir conditions, although the stability of the methane foam is weaker than that of the nitrogen foam, some methane may be dissolved in the crude oil to decrease the viscosity after the foam collapses, which leads to the methane foam being the preferred method in oilfields.

Dataset Information

Effect of Hearing Protection Use on Pianists’ Performance and Experience: Comparing Foam and Musician Earplugs

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets