Dataset Information

A comparison of methods to estimate organ doses in CT when utilizing approximations to the tube current modulation function.

ABSTRACT: Most methods to estimate patient dose from computed tomography (CT) exams have been developed based on fixed tube current scans. However, in current clinical practice, many CT exams are performed using tube current modulation (TCM). Detailed information about the TCM function is difficult to obtain and therefore not easily integrated into patient dose estimate methods. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of organ dose estimates obtained using methods that approximate the TCM function using more readily available data compared to estimates obtained using the detailed description of the TCM function.Twenty adult female models generated from actual patient thoracic CT exams and 20 pediatric female models generated from whole body PET∕CT exams were obtained with IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval. Detailed TCM function for each patient was obtained from projection data. Monte Carlo based models of each scanner and patient model were developed that incorporated the detailed TCM function for each patient model. Lungs and glandular breast tissue were identified in each patient model so that organ doses could be estimated from simulations. Three sets of simulations were performed: one using the original detailed TCM function (x, y, and z modulations), one using an approximation to the TCM function (only the z-axis or longitudinal modulation extracted from the image data), and the third was a fixed tube current simulation using a single tube current value which was equal to the average tube current over the entire exam. Differences from the reference (detailed TCM) method were calculated based on organ dose estimates. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between methods after testing for normality. Equivalence test was performed to compare the equivalence limit between each method (longitudinal approximated TCM and fixed tube current method) and the detailed TCM method. Minimum equivalence limit was reported for each organ.Doses estimated using the longitudinal approximated TCM resulted in small differences from doses obtained using the detailed TCM function. The calculated root-mean-square errors (RMSE) for adult female chest simulations were 9% and 3% for breasts and lungs, respectively; for pediatric female chest and whole body simulations RMSE were 9% and 7% for breasts and 3% and 1% for lungs, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficients were consistently high for the longitudinal approximated TCM method, ranging from 0.947 to 0.999, compared to the fixed tube current value ranging from 0.8099 to 0.9916. In addition, an equivalence test illustrated that across all models the longitudinal approximated TCM is equivalent to the detailed TCM function within up to 3% for lungs and breasts.While the best estimate of organ dose requires the detailed description of the TCM function for each patient, extracting these values can be difficult. The presented results show that an approximation using available data extracted from the DICOM header provides organ dose estimates with RMSE of less than 10%. On the other hand, the use of the overall average tube current as a single tube current value was shown to result in poor and inconsistent estimates of organ doses.

SUBMITTER: Khatonabadi M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3422360 | biostudies-other | 2012 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo develop and validate a computed tomography (CT) harmonization technique by combining noise-stabilization and autocalibration methodologies to provide reliable densitometry measurements in heterogeneous acquisition protocols.MethodsWe propose to reduce the effects of spatially variant noise such as nonuniform patterns of noise and biases. The method combines the statistical characterization of the signal-to-noise relationship in the CT image intensities, which allows us to estimate both the signal and spatially variant variance of noise, with an autocalibration technique that reduces the nonuniform biases caused by noise and reconstruction techniques. The method is firstly validated with anthropomorphic synthetic images that simulate CT acquisitions with variable scanning parameters: different dosage, nonhomogeneous variance of noise, and various reconstruction methods. We finally evaluate these effects and the ability of our method to provide consistent densitometric measurements in a cohort of clinical chest CT scans from two vendors (Siemens, n = 54 subjects; and GE, n = 50 subjects) acquired with several reconstruction algorithms (filtered back-projection and iterative reconstructions) with high-dose and low-dose protocols.ResultsThe harmonization reduces the effect of nonhomogeneous noise without compromising the resolution of the images (25% RMSE reduction in both clinical datasets). An analysis through hierarchical linear models showed that the average biases induced by differences in dosage and reconstruction methods are also reduced up to 74.20%, enabling comparable results between high-dose and low-dose reconstructions. We also assessed the statistical similarity between acquisitions obtaining increases of up to 30% points and showing that the low-dose vs high-dose comparisons of harmonized data obtain similar and even higher similarity than the observed for high-dose vs high-dose comparisons of nonharmonized data.ConclusionThe proposed harmonization technique allows to compare measures of low-dose with high-dose acquisitions without using a specific reconstruction as a reference. Since the harmonization does not require a precalibration with a phantom, it can be applied to retrospective studies. This approach might be suitable for multicenter trials for which a reference reconstruction is not feasible or hard to define due to differences in vendors, models, and reconstruction techniques.

Project description:IntroductionRe-irradiation is frequently performed in the era of precision oncology, but previous doses to organs-at-risk (OAR) must be assessed to avoid cumulative overdoses. Stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) enables highly precise ablation of tumors close to OAR. However, OAR doses may change considerably during adaptive treatment, which complicates potential re-irradiation. We aimed to compare the baseline plan with different dose accumulation techniques to inform re-irradiation.Patients & methodsWe analyzed 18 patients who received SMART to lung or liver tumors inside prospective databases. Cumulative doses were calculated inside the planning target volumes (PTV) and OAR for the adapted plans and theoretical non-adapted plans via (1) cumulative dose volume histograms (DVH sum plan) and (2) deformable image registration (DIR)-based dose accumulation to planning images (DIR sum plan). We compared cumulative dose parameters between the baseline plan, DVH sum plan and DIR sum plan using equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2).ResultsIndividual patients presented relevant increases of near-maximum doses inside the proximal bronchial tree, spinal cord, heart and gastrointestinal OAR when comparing adaptive treatment to the baseline plans. The spinal cord near-maximum doses were significantly increased in the liver patients (D2% median: baseline 6.1 Gy, DIR sum 8.1 Gy, DVH sum 8.4 Gy, p = 0.04; D0.1 cm³ median: baseline 6.1 Gy, DIR sum 8.1 Gy, DVH sum 8.5 Gy, p = 0.04). Three OAR overdoses occurred during adaptive treatment (DIR sum: 1, DVH sum: 2), and four more intense OAR overdoses would have occurred during non-adaptive treatment (DIR sum: 4, DVH sum: 3). Adaptive treatment maintained similar PTV coverages to the baseline plans, while non-adaptive treatment yielded significantly worse PTV coverages in the lung (D95% median: baseline 86.4 Gy, DIR sum 82.4 Gy, DVH sum 82.2 Gy, p = 0.006) and liver patients (D95% median: baseline 87.4 Gy, DIR sum 82.1 Gy, DVH sum 81.1 Gy, p = 0.04).ConclusionOAR doses can increase during SMART, so that re-irradiation should be planned based on dose accumulations of the adapted plans instead of the baseline plan. Cumulative dose volume histograms represent a simple and conservative dose accumulation strategy.

Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate the clinical utility of fully-automated 3D organ segmentation in assessing hepatic steatosis on pre-contrast and post-contrast CT images using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as reference standard.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 362 adult potential living liver donors with abdominal CT scans and MRS-PDFF. Using a deep learning-based tool, mean volumetric CT attenuation of the liver and spleen were measured on pre-contrast (liver(L)_pre and spleen(S)_pre) and post-contrast (L_post and S_post) images. Agreements between volumetric and manual region-of-interest (ROI)-based measurements were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Diagnostic performances of volumetric parameters (L_pre, liver-minus-spleen (L-S)_pre, L_post, and L-S_post) were evaluated for detecting MRS-PDFF ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared with those of ROI-based parameters.ResultsAmong the 362 subjects, 105 and 35 had hepatic steatosis with MRS-PDFF ≥ 5% and ≥ 10%, respectively. Volumetric and ROI-based measurements revealed ICCs of 0.974, 0.825, 0.992, and 0.962, with mean differences of -4.2 HU, -3.4 HU, -1.2 HU, and -7.7 HU for L_pre, S_pre, L_post, and S_post, respectively. Volumetric L_pre, L-S_pre, L_post, and L-S_post yielded areas under the ROC curve of 0.813, 0.813, 0.734, and 0.817 for MRS-PDFF ≥ 5%; and 0.901, 0.915, 0.818, and 0.868 for MRS-PDFF ≥ 10%, comparable with those of ROI-based parameters (0.735-0.818; and 0.816-0.895, Ps = 0.228-0.911).ConclusionAutomated 3D segmentation of the liver and spleen in CT scans can provide volumetric CT attenuation-based parameters to detect and grade hepatic steatosis, applicable to pre-contrast and post-contrast images.Clinical relevance statementVolumetric CT attenuation-based parameters of the liver and spleen, obtained through automated segmentation tools from pre-contrast or post-contrast CT scans, can efficiently detect and grade hepatic steatosis, making them applicable for large population data collection.Key points• Automated organ segmentation enables the extraction of CT attenuation-based parameters for the target organ. • Volumetric liver and spleen CT attenuation-based parameters are highly accurate in hepatic steatosis assessment. • Automated CT measurements from pre- or post-contrast imaging show promise for hepatic steatosis screening in large cohorts.

Project description:Radiation exposure from computed tomography (CT) to the public has increased the concern among radiation protection professionals. Being able to accurately assess the radiation dose patients receive during CT procedures is a crucial step in the management of CT dose. Currently, various computational anthropomorphic phantoms are used to assess radiation dose by different research groups. It is desirable to better understand how the dose results are affected by different choices of phantoms. In this study, the authors assessed the uncertainties in CT dose and risk estimation associated with different types of computational phantoms for a selected group of representative CT protocols.Routinely used CT examinations were categorized into ten body and three neurological examination categories. Organ doses, effective doses, risk indices, and conversion coefficients to effective dose and risk index (k and q factors, respectively) were estimated for these examinations for a clinical CT system (LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare). Four methods were used, each employing a different type of reference phantoms. The first and second methods employed a Monte Carlo program previously developed and validated in our laboratory. In the first method, the reference male and female extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) phantoms were used, which were initially created from the Visible Human data and later adjusted to match organ masses defined in ICRP publication 89. In the second method, the reference male and female phantoms described in ICRP publication 110 were used, which were initially developed from tomographic data of two patients and later modified to match ICRP 89 organ masses. The third method employed a commercial dosimetry spreadsheet (ImPACT group, London, England) with its own hermaphrodite stylized phantom. In the fourth method, another widely used dosimetry spreadsheet (CT-Expo, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany) was employed together with its associated male and female stylized phantoms.For fully irradiated organs, average coefficients of variation (COV) ranged from 0.07 to 0.22 across the four male phantoms and from 0.06 to 0.18 across the four female phantoms; for partially irradiated organs, average COV ranged from 0.13 to 0.30 across the four male phantoms and from 0.15 to 0.30 across the four female phantoms. Doses to the testes, breasts, and esophagus showed large variations between phantoms. COV for gender-averaged effective dose and k factor ranged from 0.03 to 0.23 and from 0.06 to 0.30, respectively. COV for male risk index and q factor ranged from 0.06 to 0.30 and from 0.05 to 0.36, respectively; COV for female risk index and q factor ranged from 0.06 to 0.49 and from 0.07 to 0.54, respectively.Despite closely matched organ mass, total body weight, and height, large differences in organ dose exist due to variation in organ location, spatial distribution, and dose approximation method. Dose differences for fully irradiated radiosensitive organs were much smaller than those for partially irradiated organs. Weighted dosimetry quantities including effective dose, male risk indices, k factors, and male q factors agreed well across phantoms. The female risk indices and q factors varied considerably across phantoms.

Dataset Information

A comparison of methods to estimate organ doses in CT when utilizing approximations to the tube current modulation function.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets