Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Combining genomic and network characteristics for extended capability in predicting synergistic drugs for cancer.


ABSTRACT: The identification of synergistic chemotherapeutic agents from a large pool of candidates is highly challenging. Here, we present a Ranking-system of Anti-Cancer Synergy (RACS) that combines features of targeting networks and transcriptomic profiles, and validate it on three types of cancer. Using data on human ?-cell lymphoma from the Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods consortium we show a probability concordance of 0.78 compared with 0.61 obtained with the previous best algorithm. We confirm 63.6% of our breast cancer predictions through experiment and literature, including four strong synergistic pairs. Further in vivo screening in a zebrafish MCF7 xenograft model confirms one prediction with strong synergy and low toxicity. Validation using A549 lung cancer cells shows similar results. Thus, RACS can significantly improve drug synergy prediction and markedly reduce the experimental prescreening of existing drugs for repurposing to cancer treatment, although the molecular mechanism underlying particular interactions remains unknown.

SUBMITTER: Sun Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4598846 | biostudies-other | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

altmetric image

Publications

Combining genomic and network characteristics for extended capability in predicting synergistic drugs for cancer.

Sun Yi Y   Sheng Zhen Z   Ma Chao C   Tang Kailin K   Zhu Ruixin R   Wu Zhuanbin Z   Shen Ruling R   Feng Jun J   Wu Dingfeng D   Huang Danyi D   Huang Dandan D   Fei Jian J   Liu Qi Q   Cao Zhiwei Z  

Nature communications 20150928


The identification of synergistic chemotherapeutic agents from a large pool of candidates is highly challenging. Here, we present a Ranking-system of Anti-Cancer Synergy (RACS) that combines features of targeting networks and transcriptomic profiles, and validate it on three types of cancer. Using data on human β-cell lymphoma from the Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods consortium we show a probability concordance of 0.78 compared with 0.61 obtained with the previous best a  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5667477 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4375393 | biostudies-literature
2024-05-06 | GSE254052 | GEO
| S-EPMC8112211 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6555538 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7347567 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7695372 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6948348 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7907601 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8308547 | biostudies-literature