Dataset Information

Presentation at computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax and first year diagnostic and treatment utilization among patients diagnosed with lung cancer.

ABSTRACT: As Medicare expands the use of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing lung cancer, there is increased opportunity to diagnose lung cancer in asymptomatic patients. This descriptive study characterizes the disease-specific diagnostic and treatment services that patients with a positive diagnosis following CT received, stratified by presentation at CT.Patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer following CT in 2013, had no history of lung cancer, survived at least 1 year, were aged 55-80 years, and had Medicare Advantage insurance were included. Patients were grouped based upon presentation at CT: morbidities unrelated to lung cancer, classic lung cancer symptoms, and cancer syndromes. Patients with none of these factors were categorized into a no diagnoses/symptoms group. The type and intensity of services used in the year following the CT was reported for each group.1,261 patients were included. Early treatment services were most common in the group with morbidities unrelated to lung cancer (13.7%) and least common in the cancer syndromes group (6.6%). Advanced treatment services were used by 47.3% of the cancer syndromes group versus 23.5% of the no diagnoses/symptoms group.The intensity of disease-specific diagnostic and treatment services varied by presentation at CT. Patients with no symptoms or morbidities at the time of CT less frequently received advanced interventions. Learning about the utilization patterns of others with a similar presentation at CT may help patients with positive lung cancer diagnoses engage in shared decision making and in norming their experiences against those of other similarly-situated patients.

SUBMITTER: Powell AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5510847 | biostudies-other | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesComputed tomography angiography (CTA) is the imaging modality most frequently used to diagnosis type A aortic dissection for chest pain with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. False negative and positive errors in diagnosis are infrequent. Despite initial negative imaging studies for dissection, surgeons must consider early operation in patients with recent onset chest pain in the presence of an ascending aortic aneurysm.MethodsWe report 4 cases (2004-2021) of patients with a mean age of 51.25 years (male:female = 3:1) who presented with chest pain. Two had a history of syncope. On computed tomography angiography, all had an ascending aortic aneurysm and no dissection flap. Three had thickening of the ascending aorta and 1 had a chronic type B dissection. On echocardiography, aortic regurgitation was moderate-severe in 2 patients, 2 had a pericardial effusion, and none had a definitive dissection flap. All were operated on because of the surgeon's concern for the association of chest pain and an ascending aortic aneurysm. The Institutional Review Board at George Washington University Committee on Human Research has determined that the research is exempt from review under Department of Health and Human Services regulatory category 4 (#FWA00005945). The project as described in the application may proceed without further oversight by the Office of Human Resources on September 9, 2022.ResultsThe diagnosis of type A aortic dissection was made at operation (3 on median sternotomy and 1 after aortotomy). All patients did well. One patient who had peripheral cannulation (no malperfusion) and severe coagulopathy developed a compartment syndrome and postoperatively required a below-knee amputation.ConclusionsSurgeons must maintain a high index of suspicion for aortic dissection when patients present with chest pain and are found to have an ascending aortic aneurysm even in the absence of initial, classic features of dissection on computed tomography angiography. Improvements in imaging techniques and analysis are required.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough small bowel bleeding is relatively rare, it is a potentially fatal disease, and its diagnosis still faces challenges. Technetium 99m-labeled red blood cell computed single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (99mTc-RBC SPECT/CT) and contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) are common imaging methods for diagnosing small bowel bleeding, but there have been no studies comparing their diagnostic efficacy for this purpose. This study aims to compare the diagnostic value of 99mTc-RBC SPECT/CT and contrast-enhanced MDCT for small bowel bleeding.MethodsA total of 44 patients (30 males and 14 females, median age of 64 years) definitively diagnosed with small bowel bleeding and 15 non-small bowel bleeding patients (8 males and 7 females, median age of 66 years) were consecutively included in this study. All patients underwent 99mTc-RBC SPECT/CT and contrast-enhanced MDCT examinations at Beijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University between January 2020 to September 2023. The definitive diagnosis had been made through surgery or colonoscopy, or through patient history, patient management, and clinical follow-up. We collected clinical data of the participants. 99mTc-RBC SPECT/CT and contrast-enhanced MDCT were reviewed in a blinded fashion for accuracy of detection of active bleeding as well as the active small bowel bleeding location.ResultsAmong the 59 patients, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 99mTc-RBC SPECT were 27.3%, 93.3%, and 92.3%; for 99mTc-RBC SPECT/CT they were 76.3%, 40.5%, and 93.3%; whereas for contrast-enhanced MDCT they were 45.8%, 27.3%, and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-RBC SPECT/CT for jejunal and ileal bleeding was high, at 100% and 86.4%, respectively. Meanwhile, 99mTc-RBC SPECT/CT had a higher accuracy in diagnosing more causes of small bowel bleeding. In 59 patients, the combination of 99mTc-RBC SPECT/CT and contrast-enhanced MDCT accurately diagnosed small bowel bleeding and provided precise localization in 50 patients, resulting in the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 84.7%, 79.5%, and 100.0%, respectively.Conclusions99mTc-RBC SPECT/CT has high diagnostic value in diagnosing small bowel bleeding and is superior to 99mTc-RBC SPECT and contrast-enhanced MDCT. The combination of 99mTc-RBC SPECT/CT and contrast-enhanced MDCT can further improve the diagnostic accuracy of diagnosis, and can accurately guide the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel bleeding.

Dataset Information

Presentation at computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax and first year diagnostic and treatment utilization among patients diagnosed with lung cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets