Dataset Information

FGFR Signaling as a Candidate Therapeutic Target for Cancers Resistant to Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.

ABSTRACT: Radiotherapy is an essential component of cancer therapy. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) promises to improve outcomes compared with standard of care in many cancers. Nevertheless, clinicians often observe in-field recurrence after CIRT. This indicates the presence of a subset of cancers that harbor intrinsic resistance to CIRT. Thus, the development of methods to identify and sensitize CIRT-resistant cancers is needed. To address this issue, we analyzed a unique donor-matched pair of clinical specimens: a treatment-naïve tumor, and the tumor that recurred locally after CIRT in the same patient. Exon sequencing of 409 cancer-related genes identified enrichment of somatic mutations in FGFR3 and FGFR4 in the recurrent tumor compared with the treatment-naïve tumor, indicating a pivotal role for FGFR signaling in cancer cell survival through CIRT. Inhibition of FGFR using the clinically available pan-FGFR inhibitor LY2874455 sensitized multiple cancer cell lines to carbon ions at 3 Gy (RBE: relative biological effectiveness), the daily dose prescribed to the patient. The sensitizer enhancement ratio was 1.66 ± 0.17, 1.27 ± 0.09, and 1.20 ± 0.18 in A549, H1299, and H1703 cells, respectively. Our data indicate the potential usefulness of the analytical pipeline employed in this pilot study to identify targetable mutations associated with resistance to CIRT, and of LY21874455 as a sensitizer for CIRT-resistant cancers. The results warrant validation in larger cohorts.

SUBMITTER: Darwis NDM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6770837 | biostudies-other | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

FGFR Signaling as a Candidate Therapeutic Target for Cancers Resistant to Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.

Darwis Narisa Dewi Maulany NDM Nachankar Ankita A Sasaki Yasushi Y Matsui Toshiaki T Noda Shin-Ei SE Murata Kazutoshi K Tamaki Tomoaki T Ando Ken K Okonogi Noriyuki N Shiba Shintaro S Irie Daisuke D Kaminuma Takuya T Kumazawa Takuya T Anakura Mai M Yamashita Souichi S Hirakawa Takashi T Kakoti Sangeeta S Hirota Yuka Y Tokino Takashi T Iwase Akira A Ohno Tatsuya T Shibata Atsushi A Oike Takahiro T Nakano Takashi T

International journal of molecular sciences 20190914 18

Radiotherapy is an essential component of cancer therapy. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) promises to improve outcomes compared with standard of care in many cancers. Nevertheless, clinicians often observe in-field recurrence after CIRT. This indicates the presence of a subset of cancers that harbor intrinsic resistance to CIRT. Thus, the development of methods to identify and sensitize CIRT-resistant cancers is needed. To address this issue, we analyzed a unique donor-matched pair of clinical sp ...[more]

PMID: 31540114

Similar Datasets

Project description:To compare the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant proton beam vs. carbon-ion beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancers after radical resection and to explore the value of particle beam radiotherapy (PBRT) in postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. Data from 38 head and neck cancer patients who received adjuvant PBRT after complete surgical resection at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) between October 2015 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 18 patients received adjuvant proton beam therapy (54-60 GyE/27-30 fractions) and 20 received adjuvant carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) (54-60 GyE/18-20 fractions). Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects (version 4.03). With a median follow-up time of 21 (range, 3-45) months, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 93.3%, 87.4%, 94.1%, and 90.7%, respectively, for the entire cohort. The rates after proton beam therapy vs. CIRT were 94.1% vs. 91.7% (P=0.96), 88.1% vs. 86.2% (P=0.96), 94.4% vs. 93.3% (P=0.97), and 88.1% vs. 92.9% (P=0.57), respectively. Furthermore, 16 of the 18 (88.9%) patients developed acute grade I/II dermatitis (13 grade I; 3 grade II) after proton beam therapy, and only 7 of the 20 (35%) patients developed acute grade I dermatitis after CIRT (P=0.001). The incidence of acute grade I/II mucositis and xerostomia in proton and carbon ion cases were 45% vs. 55% (P=0.75) and 56% vs. 50% (P=0.87) respectively. Adjuvant proton beam therapy and CIRT after radical surgical resection for head and neck cancers provided satisfactory therapeutic effectiveness, but no significant difference was observed between the two radiotherapy technologies. However, adjuvant CIRT was associated with a more favorable acute toxicity profile as compared to proton beam therapy with significantly lower frequency and severity of acute dermatitis observed.

Project description:BackgroundThe dose distribution of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) is highly sensitive to anatomical changes.PurposeTo demonstrate the dosimetric benefits of adaptive CIRT for LANSCLC and compare the differences between patients with and without adaptive plans based on dosimetry and clinical effect factors.Materials and methodsOf the 98 patients with LANSCLC receiving CIRT, 31 patients underwent replanning following re-evaluations that revealed changes that would have compromised the dose coverage of the target volume or violated dose constraints. Dosimetric parameters and clinical factors were compared between patients with and without adaptive plans. Multivariate analysis identified factors influencing the adaptive planning.ResultsThe median number of fractions delivered using adaptive plans was eight (range: 2-18). Adaptive plans ensured target coverage, and the maximum spinal cord dose was significantly decreased (p = 0.02). The median reduction in the maximum spinal cord dose was 10.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness). Patients with adaptive plans had larger tumor volumes (p < 0.001); the median initial internal gross tumor volumes (iGTVs) of patients with adaptive and nonadaptive plans were 125.9 and 49.79 cm3 , respectively. Tumor volumes of patients with adaptive plans were altered to a greater extent (p < 0.001); the median absolute percentage of volume changes in patients in the adaptive and in nonadaptive groups were 20.76% and 3.63%, respectively, while the median movements of iGTV centers were 5.75 and 2.44 mm, respectively. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the iGTV volume change and iGTV center movements were significantly different between the groups.ConclusionsAn adaptive plan can effectively ensure target area coverage and protect normal tissues, especially in patients with large tumor volumes and substantial changes. iGTV volume changes and iGTV center movements are the main factors influencing adaptive planning. Weekly simulation computed tomography scans are necessary for treatment evaluation in patients with LANSCLC treated with CIRT.

Dataset Information

FGFR Signaling as a Candidate Therapeutic Target for Cancers Resistant to Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.

Publications

FGFR Signaling as a Candidate Therapeutic Target for Cancers Resistant to Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets