Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

28 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Cetuximab Monotherapy Maintenance Treatment in mCRC

ABSTRACT: Investigating the efficacy of Cetuximab Monotherapy versus Continuation after induction treatment with chemotherapy + Cetuximab in inoperable or irresectable and non-progressive metastatic colorectal cancer after first line induction treatment for 24 weeks with mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI and Cetuximab treatment. Reinduction treatment will be done in case of progression.

DISEASE(S): Colorectal Cancer,Colorectal Neoplasms

PROVIDER: 2230951 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Optimal Maintenance Therapy With Bevacizumab After Induction in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRC)

Project description:Investigating the efficacy of maintenance and reinduction treatment or no treatment and watchful waiting in subjects with inoperable or irresectable and non-progressive metastatic colorectal cancer after first line induction treatment for 24 weeks with a fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. The maintenance treatment with capecitabine or 5-FU/folinic acid and bevacizumab will be compared with a maintenance treatment with bevacizumab alone or no maintenance treatment. Reinduction treatment will be done in case of progression.

| 2077756 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Cetuximab Maintenance Treatment Versus Continuation After Induction Therapy in mCRC

Project description:This study is try to evaluate the effect of cetuximab monotherapy as maintenance treatment, versus continuation after 8 courses of induction therapy with cetuximab plus standard chemotherapy regimen (FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6）in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. The maintenance treatments are continued until disease progression or untolerated toxicity. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that cetuximab monotherapy is non-inferior to continuation treatment, in those mCRC patients who responded to induction therapy(SD, PR, or CR), and carry biomarker-panels (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA) favor EGFR antibody.

| 2228220 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Phase II exploratory pharmacogenomics study of cetuximab monotherapy in patients with advanced metastatic CRC

Project description:Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled for treatment with cetuximab monotherapy. Transcriptional profiling was conducted on RNA from pre-treatment metastatic site biopsies to identify genes whose expression correlates with best clinical responses. Keywords: comparison of disease control group versus non-responder group of patients

2008-01-31 | GSE5851 | GEO

Transcription profiling of human patients with advances metastatic colo-rectal cancer - phase II exploratory pharmacogenomics study of cetuximab monotherapy

Project description:Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled for treatment with cetuximab monotherapy. Transcriptional profiling was conducted on RNA from pre-treatment metastatic site biopsies to identify genes whose expression correlates with best clinical responses. Experiment Overall Design: single pre-treatment metastatic biopsy from each patient analyzed

2008-06-14 | E-GEOD-5851 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine as Maintenance Treatment in RAS and BRAF wt Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Project description:This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized study to be conducted in Chinese patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. Patients who have already completed 9 cycles of standard first-line induction treatment, without discontinuation for toxicity, of cetuximab or fluorouracil or oxaliplatin,, and achieved disease control (including CR/PR and SD), and are progression free at the end of Cycle 9 will be assigned to 2 maintenance treatment groups by randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive cetuximab + capecitabine (Arm A) or cetuximab alone (Arm B). The randomization will be stratified by induction treatment response (complete response [CR]+ partial response [PR] versus stable disease [SD]) and primary tumor location (left side only versus right side). All patients from Arm A and Arm B will be treated until progressive disease, death from any cause, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal (whichever occurs earlier).

| 2329576 | ecrin-mdr-crc

human glioma cell-line proteomics upon treatment with different drugs

Project description:Increasing evidence suggests that induction of lethal autophagy carries potential significance for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). In continuation of our previous work, we investigated if autophagy-inducing compunds can trigger ATG-dependent cell death in human MZ-54 GBM cells and which pathways may be affected using TMT10-based quantitative proteomics as one of the tools.

2021-02-26 | PXD015074 | Pride

Cetuximab treatment of HNSCC

Project description:Cetuximab treatment of HNSCC

| PRJNA435545 | ENA

Panitumumab-based Maintenance in Patients With RAS Wild-type, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Valentino)

Project description:Open label, randomized, multicenter, phase II study to compare the efficacy, in terms of non-inferiority of progression-free survival (PFS), of maintenance with panitumumab alone (arm B) as compared to panitumumab with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (arm A) following induction treatment with 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin+oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) and panitumumab in patients with RAS wild-type, metastatic colorectal cancer. The study involves an induction phase with panitumumab as 1 hour intravenous infusion at the dosage of 6 mg/kg, given every two weeks, plus FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy as standard guidelines. Before start of FOLFOX-4 plus panitumumab, at the time of enrollment, patients will be immediately randomized electronically 1:1 to one of the two maintenance arms. Induction treatment with FOLFOX-4 plus panitumumab will continue until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal, or for up to 8 cycles. At the end of induction treatment, in presence of complete or partial response, or stable disease, non-progressing patients will be allocated to one of the two pre-assigned maintenance arms: A) 5-FU/LV (De Gramont regimen) plus panitumumab given at 6 mg/Kg every two weeks until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal B) Panitumumab alone given at 6 mg/Kg every two weeks until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal Imaging studies (thorax and abdominal CT or MRI scan) will be performed at baseline (4 weeks prior enrollment) and every 8 weeks (4 cycles) during treatment.

| 2192462 | ecrin-mdr-crc

The expression profile of Cetuximab resistance in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma cells.

Project description:Cetuximab (Erbitux) is an antibody drug against EGFR and commonly used in late stage HNSCC and metastatic colorectal cancer. The oncogenic mutation of certain genes are known to drive Cetuximab resistance such as K-RAS or b-RAF mutation. The aberrant activation of signaling pathways in the presence of Cetuximab treatment to overcome cellular stress contribute to acquired resistance to Cetuximab as well. To better understand the mechanisms and molecular patterns of Cetuximab resistant cells, the Cetuximab resistant cells are trained for examining the gene expression profile. The gene expression array is used for identify the molecular signature governing the Cetuximab resitance.

2017-03-02 | GSE63916 | GEO

TGF-beta-activated cancer-associated fibroblasts limit cetuximab efficacy in preclinical models of head and neck cancer

Project description:Most head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are resistant to cetuximab, an antibody against the epithelial growth factor receptor. Such therapy resistance is known to be mediated, in part, by stromal cells surrounding the tumor cells; however, the mechanisms underlying such a resistance phenotype remain unclear. To identify the mechanisms underlying cetuximab resistance in an unbiased manner, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) of HNC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) was performed. Comparing the gene expression of HNC-PDXs before and after treatment with cetuximab indicated that the TGF-beta signaling pathway was upregulated in the stromal cells of PDXs that progressed to cetuximab (CetuximabProg-PDX). However, in PDXs that were extremely sensitive to cetuximab, and when tumors shrunk following cetuximab treatment (CetuximabSen-PDX), the TGF-beta pathway was downregulated in the stromal compartment. Histopathological analysis of PDXs showed that in CetuximabProg-PDX, TGF-beta-activation was detected in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). These TGF-beta-activated CAFs were sufficient to limit cetuximab efficacy in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, blocking the TGF-beta pathway using the SMAD3 inhibitor, SIS3, enhanced cetuximab efficacy and prevented the progression of CetuximabProg-PDX. Altogether, our findings indicate, for the first time, that TGF-beta-activated CAFs play a role in limiting cetuximab efficacy in HNC.

2020-03-23 | GSE143279 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data