Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Efficacy and safety of cold polypectomy for colorectal polyps : a prospective randomized study

ABSTRACT: Interventions: Conventional polypectomy Cold polypectomy Primary outcome(s): The incidence of delayed bleeding Study Design: Parallel Randomized

DISEASE(S): Colorectal Adenoma

PROVIDER: 2632859 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy

Project description:The aim of this study is to compare cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for the removal and retrieval of small colorectal polyps. Cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is expected to be more effective than conventional polypectomy.

| 2061869 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Evaluation of usefulness of prophylactically hemostatic clipping for artificial ulcers after cold snare polypectomy for colonic polyps

Project description:Interventions: Cold snare polypectomy Hemostatic clipping after cold snare polypectomy Primary outcome(s): Bleeding rate after cold snare polypectomy. Study Design: Parallel Randomized

| 2633840 | ecrin-mdr-crc

The investigation of prophylactic clip hemorrhage control for colorectal cold snare polypectomy in patients taking anti-thrombotic drugs.

Project description:Interventions: Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and do not meet the exclusion criteria are randomly assigned 1:1 to the clip closure group or the non-clip closure group. Hematochezia will be evaluated in a patient diary for 2 weeks after the cold snare polypectomy.;D016430;CSP clip Antithrombotics Primary outcome(s): Percentage of delayed bleeding within 2 weeks after CSP (per patient). Delayed bleeding is defined as hematochezia requiring endoscopic hemostasis within 2 weeks after CSP. Study Design: randomized controlled trial, open(masking not used), no treatment control/standard of care control, parallel assignment, treatment purpose

| 97511 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colonic Sessile Serrated Polyps

Project description:Comparing the efficacy of cold snare polypectomy with endoscopic mucosal resection

| 2230090 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Feasibility and cost analysis of post-polypectomy trauma opening in patients with colorectal cancer: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study protocol

Project description:Interventions: control group (retrospective):wound closure;experimental group:wound opening Primary outcome(s): Incidence of delayed bleeding after polypectomy Study Design: Single arm

| 81172 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Evaluation of Cold Forcep and Cold Snare Polypectomy for Polyps Less Than or Equal to 3mm in Size During Colonoscopy

Project description:The focus of the study is to evaluate impact of cold forcep and cold snare in achieving complete resection during polypectomy of polyps <=3mm during colonoscopy.

| 2351722 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Randomised Comparison of 2 Cold Snare Polypectomy Techniques

Project description:Different modalities are employed to remove small colonic polyps which potentially harbour a cancer risk. But, they can all vary in their completeness of removal, safety and the histological quality and the gold standard technique has yet to be defined. A novel suction pseudopolyp technique has been described by Patullo et al and in their prospective study, 126 polyps measuring less than 10mm flat or sessile were removed by this method with 100% complete endoscopic resection and without any immediate or delayed complications. The aim of the investigators study is to compare this technique with the standard cold snare technique. Patients attending for a routine colonoscopy and found to have polyps measuring 37mm in size will be eligible and they will be randomised to the polypectomy technique. Patient demographics and polyp characteristics will be recorded. The primary outcome measured will be the macroscopic resection rate. The secondary outcome measures are abdominal pain, tenderness, bleeding and fever.

| 2171956 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Clinical study of underwater cold snare polypectomy for the treatment of colorectal adenoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Project description:Interventions: experimenta group:Underwater cold snare polypectomy;control group:Cold trap polyp resection Primary outcome(s): Biopsy results of the bottom and edge of the specimen Study Design: Parallel

| 2705021 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Cold Snare Polypectomy for Duodenal Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Project description:The purpose of this study is to collect prospective observational data regarding patients with diagnosed Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) undergoing cold snare polypectomy for duodenal adenomas

| 2268802 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Resection depth for small colorectal polyps comparing cold snare polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.

Project description:Background and study aims Small colorectal polyps are removed by various methods, including cold snare polypectomy (CSP), hot snare polypectomy (HSP), and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR), but the indications for using these methods are unclear. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy of CSP, HSP, and UEMR for small polyps, focusing on the depth of the resected specimens. Patients and methods Outpatients with non-pedunculated small polyps (endoscopically diagnosed as 6 to 9 mm), resected by two endoscopists between July 2019 and September 2020, were enrolled. We histologically evaluated the specimens resected via CSP, HSP, and UEMR. The main outcome was the containment rate of the muscularis mucosa (MM) and submucosa (SM) tissues. Results Forty polyps resected via CSP (n = 14), HSP (n = 12), or UEMR (n = 14) were enrolled after excluding 13 polyps with resection depths that were difficult to determine. The rates of specimens containing MM and SM tissue differed significantly (57 % and 29 % for CSP, 92 % and 83 % for HSP, and 100 % and 100 % for UEMR, respectively ( P = 0.005 for MM and P < 0.001 for SM tissue). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed UEMR was an independent factor relating to the containment of SM tissue. The thickness of SM tissue by CSP, HSP, and UEMR were 52 μm, 623 μm, and 1119 μm, respectively ( P < 0.001). The thickness by CSP was significantly less than those by HSP and UEMR ( P < 0.001, Bonferroni correction). Conclusions UEMR could be the best method to contain SM tissue without injection. Further studies are needed to evaluate the indication of UEMR for small polyps.

| S-EPMC9106413 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data