Expression analysis of circadian light response in Drosophila
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster
PROVIDER: GSE39578 | GEO | 2014/07/23
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA171155
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Light is a strong environmental cue that resets the circadian clock rhythm. We have used Affymetrix microarrays to profile the Drosophila head transcriptome response following a brief light pulse during the early night. Comparison of control (un-pulsed) and experimental flies reveal large number of differentially expressed transcripts underlying the process of light entrainment of the clock. Wild type flies exposed to light pulse at ZT15 compared to control group (no pulse)
2014-07-23 | E-GEOD-39578 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The mammalian master circadian pacemaker within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) maintains tight entrainment to the 24 hr light/dark cycle via a sophisticated clock-gated rhythm in the responsiveness of the oscillator to light. Intriguingly, entrainment is not merely a passive response, instead the internal oscillator responds and adjust its own timing to entrainment signals discriminating the time of day. For example, exposure to brief light pulses in the first and final hours of the subjective generate circadian phase delays and advances respectively; whereas similar photic pulses during the subjective day does not modify the phase. A central event in this light entrainment process appears to be the rapid induction of gene expression via the ERK/MAPK pathway. We used microarray-based expression profiling of the suprachiasmatic nucleus to examine the role of MAPK signaling in the light-evoked transcriptional response. We focused on three circadian timepoints that define the unique, clock-time delimited response properties of the SCN to light: the subjective day, early subjective night, and late subjective night.
2021-03-24 | GSE165799 | GEO
Project description:Light pulses at the end of the day or night be able to control the phase of the circadian clock. Pulses in the middle of the night has not effect on the circadian oscilations. To understand how the circadian clock gate the light signal in the middle of the night we used microarrays to characterize the light effect in the whole expression profile. Plants of Arabidopsis thalina (Columbia ecotype) were grown in 12/12 light/dark cicles for 15 days and then were tranfer to continuous dark . Plants were slplit in two groups. First group recieved 1hr light pulse in the middle of the night (Night treatment), second group recieve 1hr light pulse in the middle of the subjective day (Day Treatment). Samples of both groups were collected without light pulse named as a control.
2013-08-02 | E-GEOD-46621 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Light is the primary environmental cue in resetting the phase of circadian pacemaker in vertebrates. In birds, the effect of light is partly mediated by modulating the levels of circadian genes in the pineal gland. To further elucidate the mechanism by which light resets the circadian clock, we studied gene expression in the chicken pineal gland under acutely extended light period.
2015-06-30 | GSE34017 | GEO
Project description:au14-07_clock - llhh clock transcriptome - Correlate clock-controlled diurnal gene expression changes with H2Bub chromatin mark changes on a genome-wide scale. - Wild type seedlings(Col-0)have been grown under Light/Dark conditions(12 h Light:12 h Dark)and thermocycles(23°C day:19°C night).After 10 days of entrainment, the conditions were switched to continuous light and temperature (LLHH) for 2 days. Seedlings have been harvested the 2nd day after the switch at Zeitgeber time 24 and 36 that correspond to dawn and dusk, respectively. llhh clock transcriptome-LLHH clock transcriptome.
2017-02-01 | GSE93340 | GEO
Project description:Light has a strong effect on whole organism physiology, such as the circadian rhythms that are phase delayed and advanced by light given at early and late subjective night, respectively. Despite the importance of the phase-dependent light responses, little is known about the underlying molecular mechanism. We performed a comprehensive analysis of genes induced by light in a phase-dependent manner in the chicken pineal gland, an organ that represents a unique vertebrate clock system harboring intrinsic light sensitivity. Newborn chicks were entrained to 12-h light/12-h dark cycle for 7 days then transferred to constant darkness for a day to be exposed to light for 1 h from CT (circadian time) 6 (representing subjective day), CT14 (early subjective night) or CT22 (late subjective night). Control animals were kept in the dark without light pulse. The pineal glands were isolated at the end of the 1-h light pulse for gene expression analysis by Affymetrix GeneChip. Each condition contains 2 biological samples.
2011-03-08 | E-GEOD-21915 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We utilized the Nematostella vectensis to quantify gene expression differences and loss during light:dark cycling and immediately after light cue removal through comparisons of 136 transcriptomes Organismal responses to light:dark cycles can result from two general processes: (i) direct response to light or (ii) a free-running rhythm (i.e., a circadian clock). Previous research in cnidarians has shown that candidate circadian clock genes have rhythmic expression in the presence of diel lighting, but these oscillations appear to be lost quickly after removal of the light cue. Here, we measure whole-organism gene expression changes in 136 transcriptomes of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis, entrained to a light:dark environment and immediately following light cue removal to distinguish two broadly defined responses in cnidarians: light entrainment and circadian regulation. Direct light exposure resulted in significant differences in expression for hundreds of genes, including more than 200 genes with rhythmic, 24-hour periodicity. Removal of the lighting cue resulted in the loss of significant expression for 80% of these genes after one day, including most of the hypothesized cnidarian circadian genes. Further, 70% of these candidate genes were phase shifted. Most surprisingly, thousands of genes, some of which are involved in oxidative stress, DNA damage response, and chromatin modification, had significant differences in expression in the 24 hours following light removal, suggesting that loss of the entraining cue may induce a cellular stress response. Together, our findings suggest that a majority of genes with significant differences in expression for anemones cultured under diel lighting are largely driven by the primary photoresponse rather than a circadian clock when measured at the whole animal level. These results provide context for the evolution of cnidarian circadian biology and help to disassociate two commonly confounded factors driving oscillating phenotypes.
2019-06-06 | GSE132202 | GEO
Project description:Circadian clocks coordinate time-of-day specific metabolic and physiological processes to maximize performance and fitness. In addition to light, which is considered the strongest time cue to entrain animal circadian clocks, metabolic input has emerged as an important signal for clock modulation and entrainment, especially in peripheral clocks. Circadian clock proteins have been to be substrates of O-GlcNAcylation, a nutrient sensitive post-translational modification (PTM), and the interplay between clock protein O-GlcNAcylation and other PTMs, like phosphorylation, is expected to facilitate the regulation of circadian physiology by metabolic signals. Here, we used mass spectrometry proteomics to identify PTMs on PERIOD, the key biochemical timer of the Drosophila clock, over the circadian cycle.
2017-11-23 | MSV000081736 | MassIVE
Project description:Light is the primary environmental cue in resetting the phase of circadian pacemaker in vertebrates. In birds, the effect of light is partly mediated by modulating the levels of circadian genes in the pineal gland. To further elucidate the mechanism by which light resets the circadian clock, we studied gene expression in the chicken pineal gland under acutely extended light period. Three paradigms of treatments were used in this study. For each paradigm, chicks were assigned at random to control treatment (control groups) or light treatment (light groups). All birds in control groups were given 12 h light and 12 h dark period (LD 12:12). Light-on time is referred to as Zeitgeber Time 0 (ZT0). In paradigm 1, birds in the light group (n =25 for each of the groups in each paradigm) were acclimated to LD 12:12 for one week in the same light scheme as were the control birds, then exposed to light for 2 h during the subjective late night (ZT22 to ZT24) on the last day. All birds (including the controls) were sacrificed at ZT0. Pineal glands were dissected and 5-6 pineal glands were pooled for the preparation of one RNA sample. In paradigm 2, birds in the light group were acclimated as in paradigm 1 for one week, then exposed to light for 2 h during the early subjective night (ZT12 to ZT14) on the last day. All birds (including controls) were sacrificed at ZT14. The pineal glands were also pooled as before. In paradigm 3, birds in the light group (n = 25) were kept in LD 15:9 cycle all the time, and all birds (including controls) were sacrificed at ZT14. Similarly, 5-6 pineal glands in the same treatment were pooled.
2015-06-30 | E-GEOD-34017 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Light pulses at the end of the day or night be able to control the phase of the circadian clock. Pulses in the middle of the night has not effect on the circadian oscilations. To understand how the circadian clock gate the light signal in the middle of the night we used microarrays to characterize the light effect in the whole expression profile.
2013-08-02 | GSE46621 | GEO