Transcriptomics

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of linear and exponential amplification techniques for expression profiling at the single-cell level


ABSTRACT: We tested the performance of three methods for amplifying single-cell amounts of RNA under ideal conditions: T7-based in vitro transcription; switching mechanism at 5' end of RNA template (SMART) PCR amplification; and global PCR amplification. All methods introduced amplification-dependent noise when mRNA was amplified 108-fold, compared with data from unamplified cDNA. PCR-amplified cDNA demonstrated the smallest number of differences between two parallel replicate samples and the best correlation between independent amplifications from the same cell type, with SMART outperforming global PCR amplification. SMART had the highest true-positive rate and the lowest false-positive rate when comparing expression between two different cell types, but had the lowest absolute discovery rate of all three methods. Direct comparison of the performance of SMART and global PCR amplification on single-cell amounts of total RNA and on single neural stem cells confirmed these findings. Under the conditions tested, PCR amplification was more reliable than linear amplification for detecting true expression differences between samples. SMART amplification had a higher true-positive rate than global amplification, but at the expense of a considerably lower absolute discovery rate and a systematic compression of observed expression ratios. Keywords: Oliginucleotide expression microarrays, T7-based linear amplification; SMART PCR-based amplification; global PCR amplification

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

PROVIDER: GSE5136 | GEO | 2006/06/27

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA96647

REPOSITORIES: GEO

Dataset's files

Source:
Action DRS
Other
Items per page:
1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

2007-08-24 | GSE5588 | GEO
2010-10-28 | GSE23868 | GEO
2024-02-11 | GSE244908 | GEO
2019-06-21 | GSE133056 | GEO
2023-06-01 | GSE218901 | GEO
2023-06-01 | GSE218899 | GEO
2020-08-01 | GSE155506 | GEO
2017-07-31 | GSE94766 | GEO
2010-10-28 | E-GEOD-23868 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2021-05-20 | GSE114776 | GEO