Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

18h before puparium formation vs. puparium formation tissue comparisons

ABSTRACT: Samples at 18h before puparium formation were compared to samples at puparium formation for each the following tissues: epidermis with attached muscle, salivary gland, wing disc, midgut, and central nervous system. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other

ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster

PROVIDER: GSE542 | GEO | 2003/07/23

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA85291

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

18h before puparium formation vs. puparium formation tissue comparisons

Project description:Samples at 18h before puparium formation were compared to samples at puparium formation for each the following tissues: epidermis with attached muscle, salivary gland, wing disc, midgut, and central nervous system. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development

2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-542 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Whole animal vs. tissues at 18h before puparium formation

Project description:Comparisons between whole animal and epidermis with attached muscle, salivary gland, wing disc, midgut, and central nervous system tissues at approximately 18 hours before pupariation. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other

2003-07-23 | GSE541 | GEO

Midgut metamorphosis timecourse

Project description:A midgut reference sample is compared to midgut samples taken at various stages before (18h, 4h), at (0h), and after (2h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h, 12h) puparium formation. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other

2003-07-23 | GSE543 | GEO

EcR mutant midgut comparison

Project description:Comparisons between EcR mutant midgut and a reference control sample from mixed-stage normal midgut Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other

2003-07-23 | GSE540 | GEO

EcR mutant midgut comparison

2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-540 | biostudies-arrayexpress

sage gene RNAi experiment

Project description:Comparisons between the salivary glands upon the RNAi of sage gene vs. the control. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development

2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-283 | biostudies-arrayexpress

sage gene RNAi experiment

2003-07-23 | GSE283 | GEO

Opportunistic binding of EcR to open chromatin drives tissue-specific developmental responses [RNA-seq]

Project description:In Drosophila, the ecdysone steroid hormone is essential for coordinating developmental timing across physically separated tissues. Ecdysone directly impacts genome function through its receptor, a heterodimer of the EcR and Usp proteins. Ligand binding to EcR triggers a transcriptional cascade, including activation of a set of primary response transcription factors. The hierarchical organization of this pathway has left the direct role of EcR in mediating ecdysone responses obscured. Here, we investigate the role of EcR in controlling tissue-specific ecdysone responses, focusing on two tissues that diverge in their response to rising ecdysone titers: the larval salivary gland, which undergoes programmed destruction, and the wing imaginal disc, which initiates metamorphosis. We find that EcR functions bimodally, with both gene repressive and activating functions, even at the same developmental stage. We find that EcR DNA binding profiles are highly tissue-specific, and transgenic reporter analyses demonstrate that EcR plays a direct role in controlling enhancer activity. Despite a strong correlation between tissue-specific EcR binding and tissue-specific open chromatin, we find that EcR does not control chromatin accessibility at genomic targets. We conclude that EcR contributes extensively to tissue-specific ecdysone responses. However, control over access to its binding sites is subordinated to other transcription factors.

2022-09-12 | GSE202809 | GEO