Protein phosphatase PP1-NIPP1 activates mesenchymal genes in HeLa cells
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: The deletion of the protein phosphatase-1 (PP1) regulator NIPP1 is embryonic lethal during gastrulation, hinting at a key role of PP1-NIPP1 in lineage specification. Consistent with this notion we show here that a mild, stable overexpression of NIPP1 in HeLa cells caused a massive induction of genes of the mesenchymal lineage, in particular smooth/cardiac-muscle and matrix markers. This reprogramming was associated with the formation of actin-based stress fibers and retracting filopodia, and a reduced proliferation potential. The NIPP1-induced mesenchymal transition required functional substrate and PP1-binding domains, suggesting that it involves the selective dephosphorylation of substrates of PP1-NIPP1.
Project description:The deletion of the protein phosphatase-1 (PP1) regulator NIPP1 is embryonic lethal during gastrulation, hinting at a key role of PP1-NIPP1 in lineage specification. Consistent with this notion we show here that a mild, stable overexpression of NIPP1 in HeLa cells caused a massive induction of genes of the mesenchymal lineage, in particular smooth/cardiac-muscle and matrix markers. This reprogramming was associated with the formation of actin-based stress fibers and retracting filopodia, and a reduced proliferation potential. The NIPP1-induced mesenchymal transition required functional substrate and PP1-binding domains, suggesting that it involves the selective dephosphorylation of substrates of PP1-NIPP1. In total 16 samples were processed. Four different cell lines were analysed: HTO_parental, HTO_NIPP1wt, HTO_NIPP1m (= alias NIPP1-Pm) and HTO_NIPP1-Pa. For each cell line 4 replicates were obtained. The HTO_parental cell line is the control cell line. For the HTO_NIPP1wt and the HTO_NIPP1-Pa the 4 replicates were obtained from two replicates of two different transgenic cell lines expressing FlagNIPP1wt (cell line wt n°1 and 2) and FlagNIPP1-Pa (cell line n°1 and 2), respectively. Each cell line was derived from the same parental control cell line.
Project description:NIPP1, an established interactor of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), is implicated in PRC2-mediated regulation of gene expression. Here, we explore whether PP1 associated with NIPP1 is involved in NIPP1-mediated regulation of genes. Therefore, we generated Hela Tet-off (HTO) cell lines that stably and inducibly express a Flag-tagged version of wild-type NIPP1 (HTO-NIPP1wt) or mutant NIPP1 (HTO_NIPP1m). The latter mutant lacks the major PP1 binding site by two point mutations in the RVXF-motif, an established PP1 - binding motif. All cell lines were derived from the same parental HeLa Tet-Off (HTO-PT) cell line which expresses only tTA transactivator and is used as a control. The Flag fusions were only expressed in the absence of doxycyline and at levels that were up to twofold higher than that of endogenous NIPP1. We performed a gene expression profiling of the HTO cell lines, using Whole Human Genome Oligo microarrays from Agilent. A Paired SAM analysis identified 1365 genes with an altered expression (P < 0.01) between the Flag-NIPP1 and parental cell lines. Importantly, only 185 genes were differentially expressed (P<0.01) between the Flag-NIPP1m and parental cell lines. Even more strikingly, only 5% of the genes that were affected by the expression of Flag-NIPP1 also showed a significantly different expression in the Flag-NIPP1m cells. A similar small overlap was noted when the analysis was restricted to the 50 genes that were most upregulated or downregulated by the expression of Flag-NIPP1. Finally, scatter plot analysis revealed no significant correlation between the genes that were affected by the expression of Flag-NIPP1 or Flag-NIPP1m. Collectively, these data demonstrate that a moderate increase in the concentration of NIPP1 affects the expression of numerous genes by a mechanism that depends on associated PP1.
Project description:NIPP1, an established interactor of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), is implicated in PRC2-mediated regulation of gene expression. Here, we explore whether PP1 associated with NIPP1 is involved in NIPP1-mediated regulation of genes. Therefore, we generated Hela Tet-off (HTO) cell lines that stably and inducibly express a Flag-tagged version of wild-type NIPP1 (HTO-NIPP1wt) or mutant NIPP1 (HTO_NIPP1m). The latter mutant lacks the major PP1 binding site by two point mutations in the RVXF-motif, an established PP1 - binding motif. All cell lines were derived from the same parental HeLa Tet-Off (HTO-PT) cell line which expresses only tTA transactivator and is used as a control. The Flag fusions were only expressed in the absence of doxycyline and at levels that were up to twofold higher than that of endogenous NIPP1. We performed a gene expression profiling of the HTO cell lines, using Whole Human Genome Oligo microarrays from Agilent. A Paired SAM analysis identified 1365 genes with an altered expression (P < 0.01) between the Flag-NIPP1 and parental cell lines. Importantly, only 185 genes were differentially expressed (P<0.01) between the Flag-NIPP1m and parental cell lines. Even more strikingly, only 5% of the genes that were affected by the expression of Flag-NIPP1 also showed a significantly different expression in the Flag-NIPP1m cells. A similar small overlap was noted when the analysis was restricted to the 50 genes that were most upregulated or downregulated by the expression of Flag-NIPP1. Finally, scatter plot analysis revealed no significant correlation between the genes that were affected by the expression of Flag-NIPP1 or Flag-NIPP1m. Collectively, these data demonstrate that a moderate increase in the concentration of NIPP1 affects the expression of numerous genes by a mechanism that depends on associated PP1. In total 12 samples were processed. Three different cell lines were analysed: HTO_parental, HTO_NIPP1wt and HTO_NIPP1m. For each cell line 4 replicates were obtained. The HTO_parental cell line is the control cell line. For the HTO_NIPP1wt the 4 replicates were obtained from two replicates of two different transgenic cell lines expressing FlagNIPP1wt (cell line wt n°1 and 2). Each cell line derived from the same parental control cell line.
Project description:To delineate the in vivo function of NIPP1 in epidermal homeostasis, we generated skin-specific NIPP1 knockout (SKO) mice where NIPP1 is conditionally removed from keratinocytes. To gain unbiased insight into the molecular mechanism that underlies the hyperproliferation phenotype, we performed RNA-seq of the isolated epidermis of control (CTR) and SKO mice.
Project description:To gain unbiased insight into the association of NIPP1 with regulatory, coding and intergenic regions of the human genome, DamID experiments and subsequent analysis by ENCODE arrays were performed. The DamID method uses fusions of the bacterial Dam DNA methylase and the protein of interest, to direct the enzymatic activity to the protein’s genomic binding sites, where the DNA is methylated. Methylated DNA is then extracted, enriched and further analysed by microarray. The PP1 (Protein Phosphatase 1) interacting protein NIPP1 has been implicated to play a role in regulation of gene expression through PRC2 function, but also has a function in splicing. The array analysis was performed to obtain a general picture of the sites of chromatin association of NIPP1 and specifically their spatial relation to coding regions as well as to identify target regions to be analysed in more detail. In addition, a PP1 binding deficient mutant (NIPP1-RATA) was analysed, thus allowing to distinguish PP1 dependent and independent sites of association with the genome by microarray analysis. NIPP1-WT is referred to as FDN and the mutant referred to as RATA in the following descriptions.
Project description:It was previously shown that expression of an activated Phactr1 mutant (Phactr1XXX) that constitutively forms the Phactr1/PP1 phosphatase holoenzyme, induces F-actin rearrangements in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Expression of the Phactr1 PP1-binding domain (C-terminal) alone is also sufficient to induce such cytoskeletal changes. In contrast, expression of Phactr1XXXC derivative, which lacks the PP1 binding sequences does not result in alteration of cytoskeletal morphology (Wiezlak et al., 2012). These observations suggest that Phactr1/PP1 dephosphorylates target proteins involved in cytoskeletal dynamics. To identify potential Phactr1/PP1 substrates, we used differential SILAC phosphoproteomics in NIH3T3 cells inducibly expressing Phactr1XXX, Phactr1XXXC constructs or vector alone. Over 3000 phosphorylation sites were quantified, among which we determined Phactr1/PP1 target dephosphorylation sites by comparative analysis.
Project description:The restrictor, ZC3H4/WDR82, terminates antisense transcription from bidirectional promoters, but its mechanism is poorly understood. We report that ZC3H4/WDR82 immunoprecipitate with PP1 phosphatase and its nuclear targeting subunit, PNUTS, which binds to WDR82. AlphaFold predicts a complex of PP1/PNUTS with restrictor where both PNUTS and ZC3H4 contact WDR82. A substrate trap, PP1H66K-PNUTS, comprising inactive PP1 fused to the PNUTS C-terminus antagonizes restrictor mediated termination whereas PP1WT-PNUTS has less effect suggesting that phosphatase activity is required for termination. One PP1/PNUTS substrate implicated in termination by restrictor is pol II CTD Ser5-P. PP1H66K-PNUTS induces Ser5-P hyperphosphorylation at 5’ ends presumably by inhibiting dephosphorylation. NET-seq analysis suggests that CTD Ser5 dephosphorylation would promote termination by increasing pol II pausing. Both inhibition of termination and CTD hyperphosphorylation require the WDR82 binding domain of PP1H66K-PNUTS that mediates restrictor binding. In summary, the PP1/PNUTS phosphatase associated with restrictor via WDR82 promotes efficient transcription termination.