Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Benchmarking SILAC Proteomics Workflows and Data Analysis Platforms

ABSTRACT: SILAC proteomics is a powerful metabolic labeling technique that limits experimental variation, while enabling accurate protein quantification. However, multiple isotopic versions (e.g. heavy and light) of the same proteins are generated, increasing spectral complexity and requiring sample deconvolution. Despite the widespread application of SILAC proteomics, various acquisition modes and software have not been comparatively evaluated. Here, we designed a comprehensive benchmarking workflow to systematically compare the performance of several software (e.g. FragPipe, MaxQuant, Proteome Discoverer, DIA-NN and Spectronaut) compatible with SILAC proteomics.

INSTRUMENT(S): Q Exactive HF-X

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (ncbitaxon:9606)

SUBMITTER: Ling Hao

PROVIDER: MSV000095236 | MassIVE | Wed Jul 03 12:08:00 BST 2024

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PXD053612

REPOSITORIES: MassIVE

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Benchmarking SILAC Proteomics Workflows and Data Analysis Platforms

Project description:Stable isotopic labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) is a powerful metabolic labeling technique with widespread applications and diverse study designs. SILAC proteomics requires the confident identification and quantification of complete isotopic versions of proteins and peptides during data acquisition and analysis. However, different SILAC workflows and data analysis platforms have not been comparatively evaluated. To fill this critical gap and provide practical user guidelines for SILAC proteomics data analysis, we designed a comprehensive benchmarking pipeline to evaluate different SILAC workflows and commonly used data analysis software. Ten different data analysis platforms were evaluated for static and dynamic SILAC labeling with both DDA and DIA methods. Both in-house generated and repository SILAC proteomics datasets were used for benchmarking with hundreds of raw data files from HeLa and neuron samples. We evaluated twelve performance metrics for SILAC proteomics including identification, quantification, accuracy, precision, reproducibility, filtering criteria, missing values, false discovery rate, protein half-life measurement, completeness, unique software features, and speed of data analysis. In summary, this study provided the first systematic evaluation of different SILAC data analysis platforms with practical guidelines to assist decision-making in SILAC proteomics study design and data analysis.

2024-11-13 | MSV000096401 | MassIVE

Benchmarking DIA data analysis workflows

Project description:Data independent acquisition (DIA) has become a well-established method in LC-MS driven proteomics. Nonetheless, there are still a lot of possibilities at the data analysis level. By benchmarking different DIA analysis workflows through a ground truth sample mimicking real differential abundance samples, consisting of a differential spike-in of UPS2 in a constant yeast background, we provide a roadmap for DIA data analysis of shotgun samples based on whether sensitivity, precision or accuracy is of the essence. Three different commonly used DIA software tools (DIA-NN, EncyclopeDIA and SpectronautTM) were tested in both spectral library mode and spectral library free mode. In spectral library mode we used the independent spectral library prediction tools Prosit and MS2PIP together with DeepLC, next to the classical DDA-based spectral libraries. In total we benchmarked 12 DIA workflows. DIA-NN in library free mode or using in silico predicted libraries shows the highest sensitivity maintaining a high reproducibility and accuracy.

2024-05-06 | PXD044981 | Pride

Benchmarking of RNA-sequencing analysis workflows using whole-transcriptome RT-qPCR expression data

Project description:RNA-sequencing has become the gold standard for whole-transcriptome gene expression quantification. Multiple algorithms have been developed to derive gene counts from sequencing reads. While a number of benchmarking studies have been conducted, the question remains how individual methods perform at accurately quantifying gene expression levels from RNA-sequencing reads. We performed an independent benchmarking study using RNA-sequencing data from the well established MAQCA and MAQCB reference samples. RNA-sequencing reads were processed using five popular workflows (Tophat-HTSeq, Tophat-Cufflinks, STAR-HTSeq, Kallisto and Salmon) and resulting gene expression measurements were compared to expression data generated by wet-lab validated qPCR assays for all protein coding genes. All methods showed high gene expression rank correlations with qPCR data. When comparing gene expression fold changes between MAQCA and MAQCB samples, about 85% of the genes showed consistent results between RNA-sequencing and qPCR data. Of note, each method revealed a small but specific set of genes with inconsistent expression measurements. A significant proportion of these method-specific inconsistent genes were reproducibly identified in independent datasets. These genes were typically smaller, had fewer exons and were lower expressed compared to genes with consistent expression measurements. We propose that careful validation is warranted when evaluating RNA-seq based expression profiles for this specific set of genes.

2017-01-31 | GSE83402 | GEO

Benchmarking commonly used software suites and analysis workflows for DIA proteomics and phosphoproteomics

Project description:This repository is related to the work "Benchmarking commonly usedsoftware suites and analysis workflows for DIA proteomics and phosphoproteomics". The following files are stored here: 1. four MS datasets generated in this work, including two two-species benchmark datasets acquired on QE HF and timsTOF Pro, and two TNF-alpha induced phosphoproteomics datasets acquired on QE HF-X and timsTOF Pro; 2. all spectral libraries used in this work; 3. raw MS data search reports with analysis logs included if software reported; 4. preprocessed MS data search reports for any result from HF and TIMS DIA benchmark datasets; 5. FASTAs used in this work; 6. a description file (Description_of_iProX_and_public_data.xlsx) for the stored files in this repository and other public data used in this work. Note: 3 and 4 are packed into one zip file for each data search experiment.

2022-12-08 | PXD034709 |

Benchmarking of 4C-seq pipelines based on real and simulated data

Project description:With its capacity for high-resolution data output in one region of interest, chromosome conformation capture combined with high-throughput sequencing (4C-seq) is a state-of-the-art next-generation sequencing technique that provides epigenetic insights, and regularly advances current medical research. However, 4C-seq data is complex and prone to biases, and while specialized programs exist, an unbiased, extensive benchmarking is still lacking. Furthermore, neither substantial datasets with fully characterized ground truth, nor simulation programs for realistic 4C-seq data have been published. We conducted a benchmarking study on 54 4C-seq samples from 12 datasets, including original murine BMM, T-cell, and 416B data, and developed a novel 4C-seq simulation software to allow for more detailed comparisons of 4C-seq algorithms on 50 simulated datasets with 10 to 120 samples each.

2019-05-29 | GSE123131 | GEO

iiCLIP protocol benchmarking with PTBP1

Project description:We describe an improved individual nucleotide resolution CLIP protocol (iiCLIP), which can be completed within 4 days from UV crosslinking to libraries for sequencing. For benchmarking, we directly compared PTBP1 iiCLIP libraries with the iCLIP2 protocol produced under standardised conditions with 1 million HEK293 cells, and with public eCLIP and iCLIP PTBP1 data. There are 3 PTBP1 iiCLIP libraries, 1 input iiCLIP library and 1 PTBP1 iCLIP2 library produced in this study.

2022-08-01 | E-MTAB-10881 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Benchmarking second and third-generation sequencing platforms for microbial metagenomics

Project description:Benchmarking second and third-generation sequencing platforms for microbial metagenomics

| PRJEB52977 | ENA

Benchmarking plexDIA analysis with SILAC-labelled Hela cell samples

Project description:SILAC labelled Hela cell lysates were mixed in defined ratios and analysed using both DDA and DIA methods, to serve as a benchmark for the novel plexDIA features of DIA-NN.

2023-10-19 | PXD039578 | Pride

Benchmarking NF-kB inhibitors

Project description:Benchmarking NF-kB inhibitors

| PRJNA562687 | ENA

FloChIP TF benchmarking data

Project description:FloChIP TF benchmarking data

| PRJEB35684 | ENA