Cloe's validation
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJEB13323 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERR1517170_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR1517170_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR1517180_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR1517180_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR1517190_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 84 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:To study their metabolic potential in natural ecosystems, we developed a species-independent LAB microarray, containing 2,269 30-mer oligonucleotides, and targeting 406 genes that play a key role in the production of sugar catabolites, bacteriocins, exopolysaccharides, and aromas, in probiotic and biosafety characteristics, and in stress response. Also, genes linked to negative traits such as antibiotic resistance and virulence are represented. This experiment is a validation experiment, where we hybridized labelled DNA from 20 LAB strains, covering 86% of all oligos. Keywords: Platform validation experiment
2009-10-20 | GSE9082 | GEO
Project description:To study their metabolic potential in natural ecosystems, we developed a species-independent LAB microarray, containing 2,269 30-mer oligonucleotides, and targeting 406 genes that play a key role in the production of sugar catabolites, bacteriocins, exopolysaccharides, and aromas, in probiotic and biosafety characteristics, and in stress response. Also, genes linked to negative traits such as antibiotic resistance and virulence are represented. This experiment is a validation experiment, where we hybridized labelled RNA from 20 LAB strains, covering 86% of all oligos. Keywords: Platform validation experiment
2009-10-20 | GSE9140 | GEO
Project description:Microarrays have evolved from low-density cDNA or oligonucleotide arrays to high-density platforms, for several study species even covering the complete transcriptome. At the same time, transcriptomics experiments have become more complex and multifactorial in nature, requiring many microarrays to assess multiple biologically relevant hypotheses. Scientists using this technology are therefore painfully aware of the high financial cost of a typical microarray experiment. Unfortunately, this often leads to either a suboptimal experimental design in an effort to reduce the cost by using fewer microarrays, or to abandoning microarray technology altogether. In this study, we argue that for many studies high-density full genome microarrays are in fact technical overkill. By selectively reducing full genome probe sets to a lower number of probes, it is possible to significantly reduce the total cost of a microarray experiment. The study consists of four microarray analyses: a cadmium probe selection experiment, a temperature probe selection experiment, a cadmium validation experiment and a cadmium validation experiment.
2009-12-31 | GSE17086 | GEO
Project description:Microarrays have evolved from low-density cDNA or oligonucleotide arrays to high-density platforms, for several study species even covering the complete transcriptome. At the same time, transcriptomics experiments have become more complex and multifactorial in nature, requiring many microarrays to assess multiple biologically relevant hypotheses. Scientists using this technology are therefore painfully aware of the high financial cost of a typical microarray experiment. Unfortunately, this often leads to either a suboptimal experimental design in an effort to reduce the cost by using fewer microarrays, or to abandoning microarray technology altogether. In this study, we argue that for many studies high-density full genome microarrays are in fact technical overkill. By selectively reducing full genome probe sets to a lower number of probes, it is possible to significantly reduce the total cost of a microarray experiment. The study consists of four microarray analyses: a cadmium probe selection experiment, a temperature probe selection experiment, a cadmium validation experiment and a cadmium validation experiment.
2009-12-31 | GSE17085 | GEO
Project description:iBench is an open-source tool that provides enhanced validation of Mass Spectrometry identification methods. For this project, iBench was applied to Percolator rescored results from Mascot searches from a tryptic digestion of the K562 proteome, HLA-I immunopeptidome experiment, and synthetic peptide libraries. Here we provide the Mascot search results which were benchmarked as well as the original searches used to generate the ground truth identifications. These search results were generated by reprocessing RAW data from the PXD031709, PXD034056 and PXD031812 repositories.
2022-10-11 | PXD034968 | Pride
Project description:Bacterial WGS validation panel
| PRJNA341407 | ENA
Project description:Tuberculosis biomarker validation cohort
| PRJNA616117 | ENA
Project description:To identify genes driving encephalitogenic CD4+ T cell migration into the CNS, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR screen and a subsequent validation screen For the genome-wide CRISPR screen, up to 4 sgRNA per gene and 800 non targeted controls were included, for a total of 87690 individual sgRNAs, and for the validation screen, up to 6 sgRNA per gene and 241 non targeted controls for a total of 12000 individual sgRNAs
2023-08-01 | GSE232340 | GEO
Project description:Peptide-Spectrum Match (PSM) Validation with Internal Standards (P-VIS) is an objective approach to validating individual PSMs. A biological sample is analyzed by LC-MS/MS and the data are searched using a traditional approach such as a database search or de novo sequencing. A PSM of interest is identified, and a synthetic version of the putative peptide is obtained. Internal standard peptides (ISPs) are spiked into both the biological sample and the validation peptide sample and both samples are analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Using PSM_validator (https://github.com/Delong-Lab/PSM_validator/releases), an open-source program we created to implement the P-VIS workflow, both the fragmentation spectrum and the chromatographic retention time for the peptide of interest in the biological sample are compared to those of the validation peptide. The same comparisons are made for each of the ISPs, and these results are used to establish a prediction interval for valid matches. If the values for the comparisons between the biological and validation peptide fall within the prediction intervals, the match is considered valid. This submission contains the data and P-VIS results from a study aimed at benchmarking the P-VIS workflow.
2020-09-21 | PXD020901 | Pride