Dpy30 regulates Myc binding to targets and Myc-driven tumorigenesis (ChIP-seq, RNA-seq)
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA395707 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR5865490_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5865490_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5865500_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5865500_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5865491_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 40 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:It remains unclear how epigenetic modulators impact the tumorigenic potential of Myc. Here we show that the core subunits, including Dpy30, of the major H3K4 methyltransferase complexes are selectively upregulated in Burkitt lymphoma, and Dpy30 is important for efficient genomic binding of Myc. Dpy30 heterozygosity does not affect normal animal physiology, but significantly suppressed lymphomagenesis and reduced expression of a subset of key pro-survival genes when Myc is hyper-activated. Dpy30 heterozygosity also impedes cellular transformation without affecting normal cell growth. These results suggest that Myc hijacks this chromatin modulator to coordinate its oncogenic program for efficient tumorigenesis, meanwhile creating “epigenetic vulnerability”, which we then exploited by specifically targeting Dpy30’s activity to inhibit growth of the Burkitt lymphoma cell model.
2018-08-01 | GSE101853 | GEO
Project description:It remains unclear how epigenetic modulators impact the tumorigenic potential of Myc. Here we show that the core subunits, including Dpy30, of the major H3K4 methyltransferase complexes are selectively upregulated in Burkitt lymphoma, and Dpy30 is important for efficient genomic binding of Myc. Dpy30 heterozygosity does not affect normal animal physiology, but significantly suppressed lymphomagenesis and reduced expression of a subset of key pro-survival genes when Myc is hyper-activated. Dpy30 heterozygosity also impedes cellular transformation without affecting normal cell growth. These results suggest that Myc hijacks this chromatin modulator to coordinate its oncogenic program for efficient tumorigenesis, meanwhile creating “epigenetic vulnerability”, which we then exploited by specifically targeting Dpy30’s activity to inhibit growth of the Burkitt lymphoma cell model.
2018-08-01 | GSE101852 | GEO
Project description:Dpy30 regulates Myc binding to targets and Myc-driven tumorigenesis
| PRJNA395705 | ENA
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
2018-08-01 | GSE101854 | GEO
Project description:To identify proteomic signatures associated with hepatocellular carcinoma driven by MYC overexpression, proteomics was performed on the LAP-tTA/tetO-MYC mouse conditional liver cancer model. Upon MYC activation, mice form liver cancer. Differential proteomics was performed in "MYC on" (MYC-HCC) mouse liver tumors versus mouse control normal liver tissue (where MYC was not overexpressed to drive tumorigenesis -- "MYC off").
2022-10-12 | PXD031478 | Pride
Project description:H9 human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) were cultured in feeder-free chemically-defined conditions in medium containing 10ng/ml Activin A and 12ng/ml FGF2 (Vallier L. 2011, Methods in Molecular Biology, 690: 5766). Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed as described in Brown S. et al. 2011. Stem Cells 29: 117685 by using 5ug of anti-DPY30 antibody (Sigma, cat. number HPA043761). This protocol was performed in control hESCs (expressing a scrambled shRNA) and in hESCs stably expressing an shRNA against DPY30 (Sigma, clone n. TRCN0000131112).This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (including details of any publication moratoria), please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/
2016-05-18 | E-ERAD-365 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:MYC oncogenes are activated in broad spectrum of human malignancies and transcriptionally reprogram the genome to drive cancer cell growth. Given this it is unclear if targeting a single effector will have a therapeutic benefit. MYC activates the polyaminehypusine circuit, which post-translationally modifies the translation factor eIF5A. The hypusine axis has been proposed to suppress tumorigenesis. Here we report essential roles for hypusinated eIF5A in the development and maintenance of Myc-driven lymphoma, where loss of eIF5A hypusination abolishes malignant transformation. Mechanistically, integrating RNA-seq, Ribo-seq and proteomic analyses revealed that efficient translation of select targets is dependent upon eIF5A hypusination, including key regulators of G1 to S phase cell cycle progression. Notably, this circuit controls Myc’s proliferative response at several levels, and it is activated across multiple tumor types. These findings suggest the hypusine circuit as a therapeutic target for a broad spectrum of malignancies.
2024-01-26 | PXD031361 | Pride
Project description:Epigenetic modulators are being recognized as attractive targets for potential cancer treatment. SET1/MLL complexes are the major H3K4 methyltransferase complexes in mammals. The DPY30 subunit is associated with these complexes by forming a dimer that directly binds to the ASH2L subunit in the complexes and facilitates methylation. We have previously established an important role of DPY30 in certain hematologic malignancies including MLL-rearranged leukemia and Burkitt’s lymphoma, but the domain on DPY30 that regulates cancer growth is not evident. Moreover, the potential of pharmacologically targeting this chromatin modulator to inhibit cancer has not been explored. Here we have developed a peptide-based strategy to specifically target DPY30 activity. We have designed cell-penetrating peptides that can either bind to DPY30 or show defective or enhanced binding to DPY30. The DPY30-binding peptides, but not the non-binding peptide, inhibit DPY30’s activity in interacting with ASH2L and in enhancing H3K4 methylation. Treatment with the DPY30-binding, but not the non-binding, peptide significantly inhibited the growth of MLL-rearranged leukemia and other MYC-dependent hematologic cancer cells including Burkitt’s lymphoma cells. These results strongly support a critical role of the ASH2L-binding groove of DPY30 in promoting the growth of certain blood cancers, and also demonstrate a proof-of-principle for the feasibility of pharmacologically targeting the ASH2L-binding groove of DPY30 for potential cancer inhibition.
2019-03-01 | GSE115988 | GEO
Project description:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and has been increasing in recent years in developed nations1,2. The MYC oncogene or its paralogs are frequently amplified or overexpressed in particularly aggressive subtypes of cancer associated with stem cell-like features and worse clinical outcomes3,4, including in liver cancer5. Unfortunately, selective inhibitors that target MYC or its transcriptional program are not yet clinically available for therapy of HCC. Here, we identified methionine metabolism as a selective vulnerability for MYC but not RAS-driven liver cancers. MYC-driven liver cancer cells are methionine dependent and S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), the predominant methyl donor, partially rescues methionine depletion. A low methionine diet, or the methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine limited MYC-driven tumor formation, but RAS-driven liver cancer was resistant to a low methionine diet. Metabolic tracing of methionine catabolism in MYC high cells identified increased m5C methylation of genomic DNA or ribosomal RNA. We identified NOP2, an rRNA m5C-methyltransferase as a MYC target gene. Knockdown of NOP2 selectively inhibited MYC liver cancer cell proliferation and in vivo tumorigenesis. Thus, methionine catabolism is critical for MYC-driven liver tumorigenesis and NOP2 may serve as a new therapeutic target in liver cancer.
2022-10-06 | GSE214724 | GEO
Project description:Purpose: To gain insight into why Dpy30∆P acinar cells fail to express terminal makers, we performed scRNA-seq using E18.5 control and Dpy30∆P pancreata. Methods: Floxed Dpy30 mice were crossed to Pdx1-Cre driver mice to obtain conditional deletion of Dpy30 exon 4 in the pancreas. In all studies, knockout mice (Dpy30∆P, Pdx1-Cre; Dpy30flox/flox) were compared to littermate controls (Dpy30flox/flox or Dpy30flox/wt). Results: In total, we sequenced 8,050 control and 7,858 Dpy30∆P cells that with the E13.5 scRNA-seq data allowed us to identify 2,207 control and 2,354 Dpy30∆P epithelial cells. We found a cluster that contained almost entirely Dpy30∆P cells, where the expression of acinar cell digestive enzymes was consistently low. The distribution of gene expression values for terminal acinar markers suggested an increased distribution in gene expression levels in the Dpy30∆P cells relative to control cells; however, this was not the case for terminal endocrine markers. Comparing the variance-to-mean ratios in the Dpy30∆P and control cells showed an increase in variance in the Dpy30∆P acinar cells but not in endocrine cells. Conclusions: Overall, these data suggest increased variation in acinar cell transcript expression in the Dpy30∆P pancreas.
2019-07-12 | GSE134181 | GEO