Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Onboarding prokaryotic transcriptional activators as metabolite biosensors in yeast

ABSTRACT: Onboarding prokaryotic transcriptional activators as metabolite biosensors in yeast

PROVIDER: PRJEB14502 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR1464150_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR1464150_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR1464151_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR1464151_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR1464152_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 12

Similar Datasets

Engineering prokaryotic transcriptional activators as metabolite biosensors in yeast

Project description:A biosensor, consisting of the prokaryotic cis,cis-muconic acid-binding transcriptional activator BenM and an engineered reporter was successfully transplanted into bakers yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNAseq data used to assess the transcription orthogonality of BenM in yeast cells is presented here.

2016-08-01 | E-MTAB-4836 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Transcriptional activators in yeast.

Project description:Eukaryotic transcription activation domains (ADs) are not well defined on the proteome scale. We systematicallly tested approximately 6000 yeast proteins for transcriptional activity using a yeast one-hybrid system and identified 451 transcriptional activators. We then determined their transcription activation strength using fusions to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain and a His3 reporter gene which contained a promoter with a Gal4-binding site. Among the 132 strongest activators 32 are known transcription factors while another 35 have no known function. Although zinc fingers, helix-loop-helix domains and several other domains are highly overrepresented among the activators, only few contain characterized ADs. We also found some striking correlations: the stronger the activation activity, the more acidic, glutamine-rich, proline-rich or asparagine-rich the activators were. About 29% of the activators have been found previously to specifically interact with the transcription machinery, while 10% are known to be components of transcription regulatory complexes. Based on their transcriptional activity, localization and interaction patterns, at least six previously uncharacterized proteins are suggested to be bona fide transcriptional regulators (namely YFL049W, YJR070C, YDR520C, YGL066W/Sgf73, YKR064W and YCR082W/Ahc2).

| S-EPMC1361621 | biostudies-literature

Genome-wide screen for regulators of the yeast pleiotropic drug response

Project description:The purpose of this experiment is to identify regulators of the yeast pleiotropic drug response by screening the yeast deletion collection transformed with a series of simple biosensors that impart improved growth rate upon induction of a series of drug pumps.

2018-12-05 | E-MTAB-6655 | biostudies-arrayexpress

An optimized RNA amplification method for prokaryotic expression profiling analysis

2009-07-25 | GSE17074 | GEO

Prokaryotic Proteogenomics

Project description:Prokaryotic Proteogenomics

| PRJNA66995 | ENA

Prokaryotic Single-Cell RNA Sequencing by In Situ Combinatorial Indexing

Project description:We present Prokaryotic Expression-profiling by Tagging RNA In Situ and sequencing (PETRI-seq), a high-throughput prokaryotic scRNA-seq pipeline. We demonstrated that PETRI-seq effectively barcoded single bacterial cells in a species-mixing experiment with E. coli (MG1655) and S. aureus (USA300). Within the S. aureus population, we found rare prophage induction in 0.04% of cells. We further demonstrated that PETRI-seq was able to distinguish between E. coli growth phases based on mRNA expression patterns by combining stationary E. coli with exponential E. coli in multiple experiments.

2020-05-25 | GSE141018 | GEO

Sediment microbial metabolite

Project description:Sediment microbial metabolite

| PRJNA804568 | ENA

prokaryotic metagenome

Project description:prokaryotic metagenome Metagenome

| PRJNA608846 | ENA

An optimized RNA amplification method for prokaryotic expression profiling analysis

Project description:Conventional prokaryotic RNA labeling method usually requires large amounts of starting materials and tends to generate high background signals. Recently, two novel methods based on amplification systems were introduced. Here, we compared three alternative strategies: direct labeling method, ployadenylation-involved oligo-dT priming amplification method and random priming amplification method (hereafter referred to as DL, PAOD and RPA method in this article) for prokaryotic RNA labeling employing the expression profiling investigation in Escherichia coli (E. coli) heat shock model. To identify an optimal RNA labeling method for prokaryotic microarray analysis, experiments were performed with starting RNA obtained from E.coli growing at control (37Â°C) or heat shock (43Â°C) condition. We employed 0.5 Î¼g of total RNA for a single round of amplification using PAOD and RPA methods coupling to IVT to generate cDNA targets. In addition, an approach using DL method was also performed. Three types of cDNA mixtures containing Cy5-labeled (or Cy3-labeled) control DNA and Cy3-labeled (or Cy5-labeled) DNA targets were hybridized with E.coli microarrays in a dye-swap strategy. Replicate experiments were conducted from the same batch of total RNA to assess technique reproducibility of each approach.

2010-05-15 | E-GEOD-17074 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Yeast meiotic transcriptional profile

Project description:Yeast meiotic transcriptional profile

| PRJNA914324 | ENA