Project description:This experiment is the analysis of the transcriptomes of several hybrid yeast strains obtained by crossing natural (from wine) isolates of S. cerevisiae and S. uvarum. All isolations have been done from hybrid strains growing in exponential phase in YPD. Keywords: Strain comparison
Project description:Comparative gene expression analysis of two wine yeast strains at three time points (days 2, 5 and 14) during fermentation of colombar must. In our study we conducted parallel fermentations with the VIN13 and BM45 wine yeast strains in two different media, namely MS300 (syntheticmust) and Colombar must. The intersection of transcriptome datasets from both MS300 (simulated wine must;GSE11651) and Colombar fermentations should help to delineate relevant and ‘noisy’ changes in gene expression in response to experimental factors such as fermentation stage and strain identity.
Project description:Genome expression analysis between the yeast wine strain L-846 (diploid heterozygous) and spore derived from it (diploid homozygous).
Project description:Comparison between two commercial wine yeast strains (UCD522 and P29) differing in their production of H2S during wine fermentation.
Project description:This experiment is the analysis of the transcriptomes of several hybrid yeast strains obtained by crossing natural (from wine) isolates of S. cerevisiae and S. uvarum. All isolations have been done from hybrid strains growing in exponential phase in YPD. Keywords: Strain comparison Transcriptomic analysis of three independent replicates of each yeast strain growing in exponential phase. Each replicate has been hybridized on a different macroarray (F19-F22-F24) as indicated in the sample files. A single DNA (S. cerevisiae 3002 wine strain) genomic hybridization, from the same labeling reaction, was done on the same macroarrays for normalization.
Project description:Gene copy number comparison between similar wine yeast strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from different geographic origins. Microarray-CGH of wine strains EC1118, L-957 and LV CB compared to a common reference. Reference DNA was from laboratory strain S288C.
Project description:Industrial wine yeast strains possess specific abilities to ferment under stressing conditions and give a suitable aromatic outcome. Although the fermentations properties of Saccharomyces cervisiae wine yeasts are well documented little is known on the genetic basis underlying the fermentation traits. Besides, although strain differences in gene expression has been reported, their relationships with gene expression variations and fermentation phenotypic variations is unknown. To both identify the genetic basis of fermentation traits and get insight on their relationships with gene expression variations, we combined fermentation traits QTL mapping and expression profiling in a segregating population from a cross between a wine yeast derivative and a laboratory strain.
Project description:Comparative gene expression analysis of two wine yeast strains at three time points (days 2, 5 and 14) during fermentation of colombar must. In our study we conducted parallel fermentations with the VIN13 and BM45 wine yeast strains in two different media, namely MS300 (syntheticmust) and Colombar must. The intersection of transcriptome datasets from both MS300 (simulated wine must;GSE11651) and Colombar fermentations should help to delineate relevant and ânoisyâ changes in gene expression in response to experimental factors such as fermentation stage and strain identity. Experiment Overall Design: Two industrial wine yeast strains (BM45 and VIN13) grown micro-aerobically in Colombar must. Microarray analysis was performed at three time points during fermentation (days 2, 5 and 14), representing the exponential, early and late stationary growth phases respectively.