Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Benchmarking Sequence Technologies for Virome Sequencing

ABSTRACT: Benchmarking Sequence Technologies for Virome Sequencing

PROVIDER: PRJEB56639 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR10359905.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR10359908.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR10359911.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR10359840.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR10359844.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 16

Similar Datasets

Comprehensive benchmarking of single cell RNA sequencing technologies for characterizing cellular perturbation systems

Project description:Comprehensive benchmarking of single cell RNA sequencing technologies for characterizing cellular perturbation systems

| PRJNA680250 | ENA

iiCLIP protocol benchmarking with PTBP1

Project description:We describe an improved individual nucleotide resolution CLIP protocol (iiCLIP), which can be completed within 4 days from UV crosslinking to libraries for sequencing. For benchmarking, we directly compared PTBP1 iiCLIP libraries with the iCLIP2 protocol produced under standardised conditions with 1 million HEK293 cells, and with public eCLIP and iCLIP PTBP1 data. There are 3 PTBP1 iiCLIP libraries, 1 input iiCLIP library and 1 PTBP1 iCLIP2 library produced in this study.

2022-08-01 | E-MTAB-10881 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE34461: Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [Array] GSE34477: Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [RNA-Seq] Refer to individual Series

2012-06-09 | E-GEOD-34478 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [Array]

Project description:Next-generation sequencing has emerged as a promising platform for whole genome transcriptome profiling. The microarray technology has in contrast a long track record, but may suffer from issues related to background fluorescence and non-specific hybridization. The two technologies have been compared for eukaryotic transcriptomes in various studies. However, for prokaryotes information on comparative performance of the two technologies is sparse. We thus compared the two technologies for Streptococcus thermophilus. With just single experiments there was a strong correlation between the technologies. We compared our in house spotted DNA microarray platform with the same RNA samples sequenced externally. The aim was to, without replicate arrays or sequencing, to determine if the two technologies correlate well.

2012-06-09 | E-GEOD-34461 | biostudies-arrayexpress

IBD virome

Project description:IBD virome Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA552463 | ENA

plasma virome

Project description:plasma virome Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA1124588 | ENA

Virome sequencing of human stool

Project description:Virome sequencing of human stool

| PRJEB35571 | ENA

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [Array]

2012-06-10 | GSE34461 | GEO

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [RNA-Seq]

2012-06-10 | GSE34477 | GEO

Benchmarking of RNA-sequencing analysis workflows using whole-transcriptome RT-qPCR expression data

Project description:RNA-sequencing has become the gold standard for whole-transcriptome gene expression quantification. Multiple algorithms have been developed to derive gene counts from sequencing reads. While a number of benchmarking studies have been conducted, the question remains how individual methods perform at accurately quantifying gene expression levels from RNA-sequencing reads. We performed an independent benchmarking study using RNA-sequencing data from the well established MAQCA and MAQCB reference samples. RNA-sequencing reads were processed using five popular workflows (Tophat-HTSeq, Tophat-Cufflinks, STAR-HTSeq, Kallisto and Salmon) and resulting gene expression measurements were compared to expression data generated by wet-lab validated qPCR assays for all protein coding genes. All methods showed high gene expression rank correlations with qPCR data. When comparing gene expression fold changes between MAQCA and MAQCB samples, about 85% of the genes showed consistent results between RNA-sequencing and qPCR data. Of note, each method revealed a small but specific set of genes with inconsistent expression measurements. A significant proportion of these method-specific inconsistent genes were reproducibly identified in independent datasets. These genes were typically smaller, had fewer exons and were lower expressed compared to genes with consistent expression measurements. We propose that careful validation is warranted when evaluating RNA-seq based expression profiles for this specific set of genes.

2017-01-31 | GSE83402 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data