Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [Array]

ABSTRACT: Next-generation sequencing has emerged as a promising platform for whole genome transcriptome profiling. The microarray technology has in contrast a long track record, but may suffer from issues related to background fluorescence and non-specific hybridization. The two technologies have been compared for eukaryotic transcriptomes in various studies. However, for prokaryotes information on comparative performance of the two technologies is sparse. We thus compared the two technologies for Streptococcus thermophilus. With just single experiments there was a strong correlation between the technologies.

ORGANISM(S): Streptococcus thermophilus

PROVIDER: GSE34461 | GEO | 2012/06/10

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA156347

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [RNA-Seq]

Project description:Next-generation sequencing has emerged as a promising platform for whole genome transcriptome profiling. The microarray technology has in contrast a long track record, but may suffer from issues related to background fluorescence and non-specific hybridization. The two technologies have been compared for eukaryotic transcriptomes in various studies. However, for prokaryotes information on comparative performance of the two technologies is sparse. We thus compared the two technologies for Streptococcus thermophilus. With just single experiments there was a strong correlation between the technologies.

2012-06-10 | GSE34477 | GEO

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [RNA-Seq]

2012-06-10 | E-GEOD-34477 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [Array]

2012-06-09 | E-GEOD-34461 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays

Project description:Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays

| PRJNA151341 | ENA

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE34461: Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [Array] GSE34477: Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays [RNA-Seq] Refer to individual Series

2012-06-09 | E-GEOD-34478 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparing two transcriptome technologies - sequencing match microarrays

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

2012-06-10 | GSE34478 | GEO

Comparison of technologies

Project description:Comparison of technologies

| PRJEB26322 | ENA

Comparison of Hybridization-based and Sequencing-based Gene Expression Technologies on Biological Replicates

Project description:High-throughput systems for gene expression profiling have been developed and matured rapidly through the past decade. Broadly, these can be divided into two categories: hybridization-based and sequencing-based approaches. With data from different technologies being accumulated, concerns and challenges are raised regarding data comparability and agreement across technologies. Within an ongoing large-scale cross-platform data comparison framework, we report here a comparison based on identical samples between one-dye DNA microarray platforms and MPSS (Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing). The DNA microarray platforms generally provided highly correlated data, while moderate correlations between microarrays and MPSS were obtained. Disagreements between the two types of technologies can be attributed to limitations inherent to both technologies. The variation found between pooled biological replicates underlines the importance of exercising caution in identification of differential expression, especially for the purposes of biomarker discovery. Based on different principles, hybridization-based and sequencing-based technologies should be considered complementary to each other, rather than competitive, and currently, both provide indispensable tools for transcriptome profiling. Keywords: biological replicates

2007-01-01 | GSE6313 | GEO

Comparing two optical technologies when screening for bowel cancer: a trial from several UK hospitals

Project description:Background and study aims The UK bowel cancer screening program has been set up to help detect bowel cancer offering colonoscopy to patients having a positive faecal occult blood test, which is a test that detects blood in someone’s stools. Colonoscopy is the gold standard tool for finding bowel cancer and polyps (type of growth that sticks up out of tissue) or adenomas (non-cancerous tumours). High quality colonoscopy largely depends on quality procedures and skills of the operator, which can vary extensively. Olympus and Pentax are two frequently used colonoscopy technologies in the UK. Although both use the same principle of video endoscopy, each type of instrument has different features that allow the operators the best options for manoeuvres and correctness, allowing for more certainty in diagnosis and better patient comfort. This study aims to compare these two optical technologies (standard definition Olympus Lucera (SD-OL) with Scope Guide against the high definition Pentax HiLine (HD-PHL)) when screening for bowel cancer in a randomised controlled trial from several UK hospitals. Who can participate? Adults who tested positive on a faecal occult blood test and were scheduled to undergo a first colonoscopy as part of National bowel cancer screening program. What does the study involve? Patients will be allocated randomly to either of the optical technologies under comparison (SD-OL vs HD-PHL). Then patients’ notes will be reviewed by the research team to record the frequency of detecting polyps and adenomas as well as procedural information, such as length of procedure, patient comfort, and type and dosage of medication used to make patients drowse or sleepy.

| 2421292 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Small Sample Amplification Technologies

Project description:This sample is part of a study that compares small sample amplification technologies. The analysis looks at differential gene expression when compared to one round of T7 amplification. A tumor cell line was used in comparison to a human reference RNA in this study. Keywords = amplification Keywords = small sample Keywords = Affymetrix Keywords: other

2005-06-03 | GSE2723 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data