Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Colorectal cancer cell supermeres isolation methods

ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer cell supermeres isolation methods

PROVIDER: PRJNA1136963 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR29867000.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR29867001.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR29867002.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR29867003.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR29867004.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 15

Similar Datasets

Colorectal cancer cell supermeres isolation methods

Project description:To identify the best method for isolating supermeres and their small RNA cargo from colorectal cancer cells

2024-07-31 | GSE272488 | GEO

Colorectal cancer cell supermeres

Project description:Colorectal cancer cell supermeres

| PRJNA1136961 | ENA

Colorectal cancer cell supermeres

Project description:To identify the best method for isolating supermeres and their small RNA cargo from colorectal cancer cells

2024-07-31 | GSE272487 | GEO

RNA Isolation Methods - Diverse Biofluids

Project description:RNA Isolation Methods - Diverse Biofluids

| PRJNA1013972 | ENA

Glioblastoma cell supermeres

Project description:To identify small RNAs coming out of glioblastoma cells in supermeres and other carriers

2024-07-31 | GSE272370 | GEO

RNA Isolation Methods - Diverse Biofluids

Project description:To evaluate performance of different extra cellular RNA isolation methods in biofluids

2023-09-30 | GSE242613 | GEO

Glioblastoma cell supermeres

Project description:Glioblastoma cell supermeres

| PRJNA1136530 | ENA

Supermeres in breast and pancreatic cancer cells

Project description:Extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, and exomere nanoparticles, are under intense investigation for cargo that may serve as clinical biomarkers or therapeutic targets. Here, we report discovery of a new extracellular nanoparticle, termed supermeres. We performed LC/MS-MS proteomics analyses on gradient-purified sEVs, NVs, exomeres and supermeres. The proteomic profile of supermeres is clearly distinct from that of sEVs, NVs and exomeres. This study identifies a new functional nanoparticle replete with potential circulating biomarkers and therapeutic targets that can be exploited for clinical benefit in a host of diseases.

2021-12-01 | PXD027258 | Pride

Comparison of EVs isolation methods for miRNAs sequencing

Project description:Comparison of EVs isolation methods for miRNAs sequencing

| PRJNA928492 | ENA

Comparison of EVs isolation methods for miRNAs sequencing

Project description:Background & aims: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) encapsulated in EVs are potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. However, discrepancies on miRNA patterns and their validation are still frequent due to differences in sample origin, EVs isolation, miRNA extraction and sequencing methods. Selecting appropriate EVs isolation methods is therefore a critical step for miRNA-based biomarker discovery. The aim of the present study is to find the most suitable EVs isolation method for miRNAs sequencing adequate for clinical application. Material & Methods EVs were isolated by Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC), iodixanol gradients (GRAD) and the combination of both (SEC+GRAD), using the same plasma sample, in triplicate isolation assays. Isolated EVs were characterized and RNA was extracted. Three different protocols for miRNA library preparation were compared (NEBNext, NEXTFlex and SMARTer smRNA-seq) and miRNAs encapsulated on EVs were sequenced using NextSeq 500 system (Illumina). Finally, the yield, abundance and diversity of miRNAs using the three different EVs isolation protocols were analyzed and compared between them. Results The majority of lipoproteins, total cholesterol and plasma proteins were removed from the EVs-containing fractions by using SEC, GRAD, and SEC+GRAD. SEC method recovered a larger amount of EVs followed by GRAD and SEC+GRAD, while GRAD and SEC+GRAD yielded the purest vesicles. NEBNext was the library preparation kit that showed the highest reproducibility among replicas, higher number of reads corresponding to miRNAs and more different miRNAs, followed by NEXTFlex and SMARTer smRNA-seq. GRAD method showed the highest reproducibility among replicas, a higher number of reads corresponding to miRNAs and more different miRNAs, followed by SEC and SEC+GRAD methods. Conclusions These results render the GRAD method to isolate EVs as one of the most appropriate to detect miRNAs from Evs.

2023-04-26 | GSE223838 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data