Project description:Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an important causative pathogen of acute hepatitis. Because of the absence of an in vitro culture system for HEV, research has been greatly impeded. And interaction between HEV and host cells was mainly studied by tansfection/transinfection system, such as Adeno virus transinfection system. We developed an in vitro culture system for HEV in PLC/PRF/5 cells. With this in vitro culture system, we studied the gene expression profile change by HEV infection. Using a microarray assay, we analysed genes of PLC/PRF/5 cells, whose transcription level could be changed by HEV infection. Five flasks of PLC/PRF/5 cells inoculated with HEV were used as test sample, and five flasks inoculated with serum-free DMEM/199 medium were used as control samples. Both test and control flasks were cultured under the same conditions. Sixty days after inoculation, the test and control flasks was resolved with Trizol and analysed with Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2 array.
Project description:Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an important causative pathogen of acute hepatitis. Because of the absence of an in vitro culture system for HEV, research has been greatly impeded. And interaction between HEV and host cells was mainly studied by tansfection/transinfection system, such as Adeno virus transinfection system. We developed an in vitro culture system for HEV in PLC/PRF/5 cells. With this in vitro culture system, we studied the gene expression profile change by HEV infection. Using a microarray assay, we analysed genes of PLC/PRF/5 cells, whose transcription level could be changed by HEV infection.
Project description:Gene expression profiling comparisons of HepG2.2.15 or PLC/PRF/5 cells either mock (M) transfected or transfected with 0.2 microM S2 RNA or Scrambled (SCR) siRNA were carried out in duplicate 48 hours after transfection. The experiments were carried out in duplicate (a and b). The following combinations of RNA were used on 2 slides each: 1. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 2. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 3. 2.2.15 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 4. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 5. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 6. PLC/PRF/5 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test)
Project description:Gene expression profiling comparisons of HepG2.2.15 or PLC/PRF/5 cells either mock (M) transfected or transfected with 0.2 microM S2 RNA or Scrambled (SCR) siRNA were carried out in duplicate 48 hours after transfection. The experiments were carried out in duplicate (a and b). The following combinations of RNA were used on 2 slides each: 1. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 2. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 3. 2.2.15 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 4. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 5. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 6. PLC/PRF/5 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) A stimulus or stress experiment design type is where that tests response of an organism(s) to stress/stimulus. e.g. osmotic stress, behavioral treatment Computed
Project description:Gene expression profiling comparisons of HepG2.2.15 or PLC/PRF/5 cells either mock (M) transfected or transfected with 0.2 microM S2 RNA or Scrambled (SCR) siRNA were carried out in duplicate 48 hours after transfection. The experiments were carried out in duplicate (a and b). The following combinations of RNA were used on 2 slides each: 1. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 2. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 3. 2.2.15 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 4. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 5. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 6. PLC/PRF/5 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) A stimulus or stress experiment design type is where that tests response of an organism(s) to stress/stimulus. e.g. osmotic stress, behavioral treatment Keywords: stimulus_or_stress_design
Project description:To reveal the HNRNPAB-regulated lncRNAs, we performed microarray analyses to screen differential lncRNAs in HCC cells after stable overexpression or knockdown of HNRNPAB. MHCC97H and HCCLM3 (HCC cell lines with high-metastatic potentials), PLC/PRF/5 and HepG2 (HCC cell lines with low-metastatic potentials) were used in this study. HepG2-control, HepG2-hnRNPAB, PLC/PRF/5-control, PLC/PRF/5-hnRNPAB, MHCC97H-control, MHCC97H-sh-hnRNPAB, HCCLM3-control, HCCLM3-sh-hnRNPAB were perpared with hU6-MCS-CBh-gcGFP-IRES-puromycin-shRNA-HNRNPAB/mock lentiviral and Ubi-MCS-SV40-EGFP-IRES-puromycin-HNRNPAB/mock cDNA lentiviral,respectively, each performed in triplicate.