Project description:To determine what signalling pathways are affected by LILRB1 in MM cells, ARP-1 MM cell lines were transfected with lentivirus to knockdown LILRB1, injected to nsg mice, sorted from the bone marrow of NSG mice and sent for RNA-seq. Total RNAs of 2 x 10^6 CTR-KD ARP-1 cells or LILRB1-KD ARP-1 cells were extracted by RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). 5-10 µg RNA samples were sent to Cancer Genomics Center at The University of Texas (Houston, TX) for RNA-seq followed by data analysis. We use the RNA-seq data to determine differential expression of genes in CTR-KD ARP-1 cells and LILRB1-KD ARP-1 cells.
Project description:mRNAseq on (1) isogenic control and Angelman Syndrome pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons or (2) antisense oligonucleotide-treated H9 hESC-derived neurons
Project description:Angelman syndrome is caused by loss of funtional ubiquitin E3 ligase UBE3A and results in severe deley in cognitive and motor development. In neurons, UBE3A locates to the synapse and to the nucleus. Loss of nuclear UBE3A results in development of Angelman syndrome like symptoms in mice. UBE3A can function as transcriptional coactivator of steroid hormone receptors, but the entire function of UBE3A in the nucleus is still not clear. So we wanted to study differences in the transcriptome in neurons differentiated from iPSCs that were derived from patients with Angleman syndrome and normal controls.
Project description:PURPOSE: Validated biomarkers predictive of response/resistance to anthracyclines in breast cancer are currently lacking. The neoadjuvant TOP trial, in which patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors were treated with anthracycline (epirubicin) monotherapy, was specifically designed to evaluate the predictive value of topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A) and to develop a gene expression signature to identify those patients who do not benefit from anthracyclines. METHODS: The TOP trial included 149 patients, of which 141 were evaluable for response prediction analyses. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR). TOP2A and gene expression profiles were evaluated using pre-epirubicin biopsies. Gene expression data from ER-negative samples of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 and MDACC 2003-0321 neoadjuvant trials were used for validation purposes. RESULTS: A pCR was obtained in 14% of the evaluable TOP patients. TOP2A amplification, but not protein overexpression, was significantly associated with pCR (p=0.001 and 0.22). We developed an “anthracycline-based score (A-Score)” that combines three signatures: a TOP2A gene signature and two previously published signatures related to tumor invasion and immune response. The A-Score was characterized by a high negative predictive value (NPV=0.98 [95% CI: 0.90-1.00]) overall, and in the HER2-negative and HER2-positive subpopulations. Its performance was independently confirmed in the anthracycline-based (FAC/FEC) arms of the two validation trials (BIG 00-01: 0.80 [0.61-0.92] and MDACC 2003-0321: 1.00 [0.80-1.00]). CONCLUSION: Given its high NPV, the A-Score could become, if further validated, a useful clinical tool to identify those patients who do not benefit from anthracyclines and could therefore be spared the non-negligible side effects. Predicting the efficacy of anthracyclines (epirubicin) in breast cancer (BC) patients (TOP trial) 120 microarray experiments from primary ER-negative breast tumors of anthracycline-treated patients. No replicate, no reference sample.