ABSTRACT: Expression data from SGBS human cells before and after 24 hours of stimulation with differentiation cocktail, with or without Scrambled (Scr) or Tenomodulin (TNMD) siRNA to knockdown the genes of interest.
Project description:In a screen for upregulated adipocyte genes in insulin resistant versus insulin sensitive subjects matched for BMI, we identified the type II transmembrane protein tenomodulin (TNMD), previously implicated in glucose tolerance in gene association studies. TNMD expression was greatly increased in human preadipocytes during differentiation, while silencing TNMD blocked adipogenic gene induction and adipogenesis. We used microarrays to identify genes of interest that are differentially expressed after the addition of siRNA to tenomodulin or scrambled siRNA, in both preadipocytes and partially differentiated adipocytes. SGBS preadipocytes were treated with scrambled or siTNMD. Cells either were kept undifferentiated or stimulated for 24 hours with differentiation cocktail. Cells were prepared with this protocol on three different occasions and total RNA was isolated to provide three biological replicates per sample.
Project description:3T3-L1 preadipocytes were treated with control siRNA and two siRNA to FTO: siFTO-1 and siFTO-2. 24 hours after transfection, cells were induced to differentiation with MDI cocktail. RNA were collected from non-treated cells, and those treated with control siRNA, siFTO-1 or siFTO-2 at 0, 6, 24 and 72 hours post induction. Three replicates were done for each data point.
Project description:We applied quantitative mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics to study the roles of Cbl and Cbl-b in long-term signaling responses related to neurite outgrowth and differentiation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Using stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and tandem mass tag (TMT)-labeling in combination with off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation and LC-MS/MS we analyzed how Cbl and Cbl-b depletion by siRNA affected the proteome, phosphoproteome and ubiquitylome of the neuroblastoma cells. SILAC proteome SILAC (Light Arg0/Lys0, medium Arg6/Lys4, heavy Arg10/Lys8) SH-SY5Y cells were treated with Cbl and Cbl-b or control (GFP) siRNA for 72 hours. For combined stimulation with ligand cocktail (FGF-2, IGF-1 PDGF-BB, TGFα) cells were treated with ligands for 48 h. Samples were analyzed in triplicates with set-up as described below: Set-up 1, 3 replicates (R1-3): Light: siGFP, Heavy: siCbl/siCbl-b Set-up 2, 3 replicates (E1-3): Light: siGFP + ligand cocktail, Medium: siCbl/siCbl-b, Heavy: siCbl/siCbl-b + ligand cocktail TMT phosphoproteome and proteome SH-SY5Y cells were treated with Cbl and Cbl-b siRNA, control (GFP) siRNA or Retinoic acid (RA) for 24 hours. Samples were prepared in triplicates and labelled with TMT10-plex reagents according to the set-up below: TMT10-126: siGFP E1 TMT10-127N: siCbl/siCbl-b E1 TMT10-127C: Retinoic acid E1 TMT10-128N: siGFP E2 TMT10-128C: siCbl/siCbl-b E2 TMT10-129N: Retinoic acid E2 TMT10-129C: siGFP E3 TMT10-130N: siCbl/siCbl-b E3 TMT10-130C: Retinoic acid E3 TMT10-131: Mix of the 9 samples SILAC Ubiquitin pulldown SILAC (Light Arg0/Lys0, heavy Arg10/Lys8) SH-SY5Y cells were treated with Cbl and Cbl-b or control (GFP) siRNA for 24 hours. Samples were analyzed in duplicates with set-up as described below: Light: siGFP, Heavy: siCbl/siCbl-b
Project description:In this study Panc-1 cells and BxPC-3 cells were cultured. The cells were harvested (untreated control 'cont') for RNA extraction, or treated for 3 hours with various exosomes preparations. The exosomes were collected from BJ human foreskin fibroblast culture supernatant without further processing (control exosomes or 'CE'), or engineered to contain scrambled siRNA ('scr') or KRASG12D siRNA ('iExo). Two or three distinct wells of cells were evaluated per treatment condition and assigned a well number (well -1, -2 or 3).
Project description:Gene expression profiling comparisons of HepG2.2.15 or PLC/PRF/5 cells either mock (M) transfected or transfected with 0.2 microM S2 RNA or Scrambled (SCR) siRNA were carried out in duplicate 48 hours after transfection. The experiments were carried out in duplicate (a and b). The following combinations of RNA were used on 2 slides each: 1. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 2. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 3. 2.2.15 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 4. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 5. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 6. PLC/PRF/5 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) A stimulus or stress experiment design type is where that tests response of an organism(s) to stress/stimulus. e.g. osmotic stress, behavioral treatment Keywords: stimulus_or_stress_design
Project description:Human CD14-positive monocytes were nucleofected with scrambled control or LSD1-specific siRNAs, and cultured with M-CSF (20 ng/ml) and RANKL (40 ng/ml) stimulation for 0, 24, or 48 hours.
Project description:Gene expression profiling comparisons of HepG2.2.15 or PLC/PRF/5 cells either mock (M) transfected or transfected with 0.2 microM S2 RNA or Scrambled (SCR) siRNA were carried out in duplicate 48 hours after transfection. The experiments were carried out in duplicate (a and b). The following combinations of RNA were used on 2 slides each: 1. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 2. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 3. 2.2.15 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 4. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 5. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 6. PLC/PRF/5 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test)
Project description:We identified that knocking down Map4k4 in endothelial cells affected genes associated with the cell cycle, mitosis, and inflammatory genes. We used microarrays to identify genes of interest that are differentially expressed after the addition of scrambled or Map4k4 siRNA. HUVECs were treated with scrambled or siMap4k4. 24 hours later, cells were serum starved overnight. Cells were prepared with this protocol on three different occasions, and total RNA was isolated to provide three biological replicates per sample.
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of infrarenal aortic tissue from Male 10-week-old C57BL/6J mice after AAA-induction with porcine pancreatic elastase, compared with sham-operated saline-injected mice. One day after AAA-induction, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with either lentiviral packaged miR-24 antagomir (anti-miR-24) or miR-24 mimic (pre-miR-24), or a scrambled microRNA control (scr-miR). Aortic samples were obtained 7 days after operation. The goal was to examine gene expression in developing AAA in this model, and to compare the effects of scr-miR, anti-miR-24 and pre-miR-24.
Project description:Gene expression profiling comparisons of HepG2.2.15 or PLC/PRF/5 cells either mock (M) transfected or transfected with 0.2 microM S2 RNA or Scrambled (SCR) siRNA were carried out in duplicate 48 hours after transfection. The experiments were carried out in duplicate (a and b). The following combinations of RNA were used on 2 slides each: 1. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 2. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 3. 2.2.15 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 4. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 5. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 6. PLC/PRF/5 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) A stimulus or stress experiment design type is where that tests response of an organism(s) to stress/stimulus. e.g. osmotic stress, behavioral treatment Computed
