Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA474776 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR7271180_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7271180_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7271181_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7271181_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7271182_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 32 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:We compared 3 small RNA library prep kits (CleanTag, NEXTflex, QIAseq) and two RNA extraction methods (miRNeasy and MagnaZol) on plasma. We report that library preparation has a significant effect upon the miRNA profile detected, with QIAseq libraries exhibiting the least sequencing bias of the three library kits. RNA extraction methods also contribute, to a lesser extent, to the miRNA profile detected, with MagnaZol RNA extraction increasing the percentage of reads mapping to miRNAs and the number of individual miRNAs detected.
2019-05-21 | GSE118125 | GEO
Project description:We evaluated the effect of the small RNA library preparation method on 5' tRNA-halves and miRNA abundance in libraries prepared from serum RNA using three commercially available small RNA library preparation kits (TruSeq small RNA library preparation kit v2 (Illumina), TailorMix miRNA sample preparation kit v2 (Seqmatic) and the NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA library prep kit (New England Biolabs)). RNA isolated from 100 µl of serum collected from healthy mice was used as input for the preparation of a small RNA library in duplicate and libraries were single end sequenced.
2017-02-22 | GSE88914 | GEO
Project description:Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues have many advantages for identification of risk biomarkers, including wide availability and potential for extended follow-up endpoints. However, RNA derived from archival FFPE samples has limited quality. Here we identified parameters that determine which FFPE samples have the potential for successful RNA extraction, library preparation, and generation of usable RNAseq data. We optimized library preparation protocols designed for use with FFPE samples using seven FFPE and Fresh Frozen replicate pairs, and tested optimized protocols using a study set of 130 FFPE biopsies from women with benign breast disease. Metrics from RNA extraction and preparation procedures were collected and compared with bioinformatics sequencing summary statistics. Finally, a decision tree model was built to learn the relationship between pre-sequencing lab metrics and qc pass/fail status as determined by bioinformatics metrics.. Samples that failed bioinformatics qc tended to have low median sample-wise correlation within the cohort (Spearman correlation < 0.75), low number of reads mapped to gene regions (< 25 million), or low number of detectable genes (11,400 # of detected genes with TPM > 4). The median RNA concentration and pre-capture library Qubit values for qc failed samples were 18.9 ng/ul and 2.08 ng/ul respectively, which were significantly lower than those of qc pass samples (40.8 ng/ul and 5.82 ng/ul). We built a decision tree model based on input RNA concentration, input library qubit values, and achieved an F score of 0.848 in predicting QC status (pass/fail) of FFPE samples. We provide a bioinformatics quality control recommendation for FFPE samples from breast tissue by evaluating bioinformatic and sample metrics. Our results suggest a minimum concentration of 25 ng/ul FFPE-extracted RNA for library preparation and 1.7 ng/ul pre-capture library output to achieve adequate RNA-seq data for downstream bioinformatics analysis.
2023-09-29 | GSE244325 | GEO
Project description:We optimzed ATAC-seq library preparation for use with Drosophila melanogaster. The protocol addresses factors specific to fruit flies, such as the insect exoskeleton and smaller genome size. The optimized protocol provides guidelines for sample input, nuclei isolation, and enzymatic reaction times. The data included here were generated using our optimized library preparation workflow.
2022-04-20 | GSE197760 | GEO
Project description:Plasma DNA from 558 malignancies, 263 benign and borderline tumors and 367 healthy control samples were collected and subjected to random short-gun whole genome sequencing.
2022-07-03 | E-MTAB-10934 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:156 samples of shot-gun gut metagenomics, corresponding to 51 patients with CRCm 54 patients with
adenoma, and 51 healthy controls
| EGAD00001010068 | EGA
Project description:RNA was extracted from a pooled sample of salivary glands that were excised from adult Diuraphis noxia aphids of two biotypes SA1 and SAM2.0. South African D. noxia biotype SA1 is known to be the least virulent aphid, while its offspring, the South African D. noxia biotype SAM2.0 is a newly developed biotype that is capable of feeding on several resistant cultivars. The overall purpose of the experiment was to establish a baseline availability of transcripts contained in the salivary glands of D. noxia aphids as well as help improve on current genome assemblies. In total, 200 glands were excised from both biotypes feeding on various wheat hosts (Tugela, Tugela Dn1, Gamtoss R, SST387). Aphid glands were excised in PBS buffer and stored in RNA-later until RNA extraction with a Qiagen Rneasy kit could commence. Library preparation for sequencing was performed using an Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA LT Sample Prep Kit following the TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Preparation Guide, Part # 15031047 Rev. E protocol. The single library was then sequenced on a NovaSeq6000 system. De novoassembly was performed making use of the Trinity package.
2023-12-31 | GSE200382 | GEO
Project description:Deep sequencing of single cell-derived genomic DNA and/or cDNAs brings novel insights into oncogenesis and embryogenesis. However, traditional library preparation for RNA-Seq requires multiple steps, including shearing the target DNA/RNA and following sequential enzymatic reactions, which result in consequent sample loss and stochastic variation at each step. Such variation may significantly affect the output from sequencing. We have found that a new technique of library preparation using hyperactive Tn5 transposase for the next-generation sequencer of Illumina's platform provided high-quality libraries from 100ng of short-length (average 700~800 bp) single-cell level cDNA. This new method reduced the number of steps in the protocol, which resulted in improved reproducibility and reduced variation among the specimens.
2012-05-25 | GSE38198 | GEO
Project description:Detergents and salts are widely used in lysis buffer to enhance protein extraction from biological samples, facilitating in-depth proteome analysis, however, to efficiently remove these detergent and salt additives from the digested peptides is essential for generating high quality mass spectra in LC-MS/MS analysis. The sample preparation methods, such as Filter-Aided Sample Preparation (FASP), acetone precipitation followed by in-solution digestion (AP), strong cation exchange-based centrifugal proteomic reactor (CPR), are commonly used for proteomic sample process, but the additives removal efficiency and the application scope of these methods need to be further investigated. In this study, we demonstrated an integrative work flow for systematical small molecular additives quantification as well as peptide/protein identification to provide a comprehensive evaluation for additive cleanup effect of proteomic sample preparation pipelines. The multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-based LC-MS approach was developed for six additives (i.e., Tris, Urea, CHAPS, SDS, SDC and Triton X-100) quantification. For the peptide and protein identification, although FASP outperformed the other two methods, these three methods were complementary to each other, in terms of peptide/ protein identification, as well as GRAVY index and amino acids distributions. By integrating analysis of small molecular quantification and protein identification datasets, we first bridged the quantitative influence of additive concentration to the peptide analysis performance. Our results provide a valuable dataset for appropriate sample preparation method selection and a guideline for evaluation of small molecular additives cleanup efficiency in the sample preparation procedures.
2017-08-11 | PXD005405 | Pride
Project description:The quality of milk metabolome analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is greatly influenced by the way samples are prepared. Although this analytical method is increasingly used to study milk metabolites, a thorough examination of available sample preparation protocols for milk has not been reported yet. We evaluated the performance of eight milk preparation methods namely (1) raw milk without any processing; (2) skimmed milk; (3) ultrafiltered milk; (4) skimming followed by ultrafiltration; (5) ultracentrifuged milk; (6) methanol; (7) dichloromethane; and (8) methanol/dichloromethane, in terms of spectra quality, repeatability, signal-to-noise ratio, extraction efficiency and yield criteria. A pooled sample of milk was used for all protocols. Skimming, ultracentrifugation and unprocessed milk protocols showed poor NMR spectra quality. Protocols involving multiple steps, namely methanol/dichloromethane extraction, and skimming followed by ultrafiltration produced inadequate results for signal-to-noise ratio parameter. Methanol and skimming associated to ultrafiltration provided good repeatability results compared to the other protocols. Chemical-based sample preparation protocols, particularly methanol, showed more efficient metabolite extraction compared to physical preparation methods. When considering all evaluation parameters, the methanol extraction protocol proved to be the best method. As a proof of utility, methanol protocol was then applied to milk samples from dairy cows fed a diet with or without a feed additive, showing a clear separation between the two groups of cows.
2019-06-13 | MTBLS623 | MetaboLights