Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA598308 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR10807913_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10807913_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10807914_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10807914_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 4 of 4 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:The yeast Dekkera bruxellensis is as ethanol tolerant as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and may be found in bottled wine. It causes the spoilage of wine, beer, cider and soft drinks. In wines, the metabolic products responsible for spoilage by Dekkera bruxellensis are mainly volatile phenols. These chemical compounds are responsible for the taints described as ‘‘medicinal’’ in white wines (due to vinyl phenols) and as ‘‘leather’’, ‘‘horse sweat’’ and ‘‘stable’’ in red wines (due to ethyl phenols mainly 4-ethylphenol). Apart from the negative aroma nuances imparted by these yeasts, positive aromas such as ‘smoky’, ‘spicy’ and ‘toffee’ are also cited. Our goal was to identify the impact that the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera bruxellensis has on fermenting S. cerevisiae cells, especially on its gene expression level. To this end we co-inoculated both yeast species at the start of fermentation in a synthetic wine must, using S. cerevisiae-only fermentations without Dekkera bruxellensis as a control. All fermentations were employed in special membrane reactors (1.2 um pore size cut-off) physically separating Dekkera bruxellensis from wine yeast S. cerevisiae. Biomass separation with this membrane was done to abolish the possibility of hybridizing also D. bruxellensis probes on Agilent V2 (8x15K format) G4813 DNA microarrays designed just for S. cerevisiae ORF targets. The 1.2 um pore membrane separating both yeasts allowed the exchange of ethanol, metabolites and sugars during the fermentation.
2012-06-13 | GSE38582 | GEO
Project description:Industrial wine yeast strains possess specific abilities to ferment under stressing conditions and give a suitable aromatic outcome. Although the fermentations properties of Saccharomyces cervisiae wine yeasts are well documented little is known on the genetic basis underlying the fermentation traits. Besides, although strain differences in gene expression has been reported, their relationships with gene expression variations and fermentation phenotypic variations is unknown. To both identify the genetic basis of fermentation traits and get insight on their relationships with gene expression variations, we combined fermentation traits QTL mapping and expression profiling in a segregating population from a cross between a wine yeast derivative and a laboratory strain.
2011-01-19 | GSE26437 | GEO
Project description:The goal of this study was to compare the expression level of the whole genome of two wine yeast strains highly differing in their sulfite production (High producer strain: 10281A; Low producer strain: 1764A). Conditions maximizing SO2 production were selected: nitrogen rich media (425 mg/l assimilable nitrogen) and low temperature (16°C). This transcriptomic analysis was performed during the sulfite production phase, just after the entry in stationary phase. This analysis is part of a global work, aiming at the identification of the molecular basis of sulfite production by wine yeasts through physiologic, transcriptomic and genetic studies.
2015-05-14 | GSE55083 | GEO
Project description:Industrial wine yeast strains possess specific abilities to ferment under stressing conditions and give a suitable aromatic outcome. Although the fermentations properties of Saccharomyces cervisiae wine yeasts are well documented little is known on the genetic basis underlying the fermentation traits. Besides, although strain differences in gene expression has been reported, their relationships with gene expression variations and fermentation phenotypic variations is unknown. To both identify the genetic basis of fermentation traits and get insight on their relationships with gene expression variations, we combined fermentation traits QTL mapping and expression profiling in a segregating population from a cross between a wine yeast derivative and a laboratory strain. 40 samples are analysed with 2 technical replicates, using a unique reference named pool of the 30 segregants. The transcriptome of each segregant is compared to the transcriptome of the pool. The transcriptome of 5 biologic replicates of each parental strain is also compared to this reference. An haploid derivative of the commercialized wine yeast EC1118 which sequence is available (Novo et al. 2009. PNAS, 106:16333-16338) called 59A was used as industrial wine yeast. It is a prototroph strain and has a MATa sexual type. The haploid laboratory strain S288C (MATa) was used for crossing.
2011-01-19 | E-GEOD-26437 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Although metabolic engineering approaches have benefited the development of industrial strains enormously, they are often only partially successful, such that additional rounds of modification are generally needed to ensure microbial strains meet all the requirements of a particular process. Systems biology approaches can aid in yeast design providing an integrated view of yeast physiology and helping to identify targets for modification. Among other phenotypes, the generation of wine yeasts that are able to produce wines with reduced ethanol concentrations has been the focus of extensive research. However, while producing low-alcohol wines, these strains generally produce off-flavour metabolites as metabolic by-products. We therefore used transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics to investigate the physiological changes of such an engineered low-ethanol wine strain during wine fermentation to determine possible strategies for by-product remediation. Integration of ‘omics data led to the identification of several processes, including reactions related to the pyruvate node and redox homeostasis, as significantly different compared to a non-engineered parent strain, with acetaldehyde and 2,4,5-trimethyl 1,3-dioxolane identified as the main off-flavour metabolites. Gene remediation strategies were applied to decrease the formation of these metabolites, while maintaining the ‘low-alcohol’ phenotype.
2018-08-22 | PXD010381 | Pride