Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Assessment of two DNA extraction kits for profiling poultry respiratory microbiota from multiple sample types

PROVIDER: PRJNA668323 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR12809400_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR12809400_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR12809500_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR12809500_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR12809401_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 260

Similar Datasets

A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma

Project description:We compared 3 small RNA library prep kits (CleanTag, NEXTflex, QIAseq) and two RNA extraction methods (miRNeasy and MagnaZol) on plasma. We report that library preparation has a significant effect upon the miRNA profile detected, with QIAseq libraries exhibiting the least sequencing bias of the three library kits. RNA extraction methods also contribute, to a lesser extent, to the miRNA profile detected, with MagnaZol RNA extraction increasing the percentage of reads mapping to miRNAs and the number of individual miRNAs detected.

2019-05-21 | GSE118125 | GEO

RNAseq of Spleen samples from conventional (CV) and germ-free (GF) chickens at 21 days of age

Project description:The gut microbiota exerts profound influence on poultry immunity and metabolism through mechanisms that yet need to be elucidated. Here we used conventional and germ-free chickens to explore the influence of the gut microbiota on transcriptomic along the gut-lung axis in poultry. Our results demonstrated a differential regulation of genes associated with innate immunity and metabolism in the spleen of germ-free birds.

2024-08-28 | E-MTAB-14264 | biostudies-arrayexpress

RNAseq of Lung samples from conventional (CV) and germ-free (GF) chickens at 21 days of age

2024-08-28 | E-MTAB-14261 | biostudies-arrayexpress

RNAseq of Caeca samples from conventional (CV) and germ-free (GF) chickens at 21 days of age

2024-08-28 | E-MTAB-14262 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Bacteria and eukaryotes

Project description:The study of DNA extraction kits

| PRJNA474064 | ENA

Examination and comparison of the RNA extraction methods using mouse serum

Project description:Serum miRNAs are considered useful as non-invasive biomarkers for various diseases, but the optimal method for extracting RNA from serum is currently unknown. In this study, several RNA extraction kits were used to determine which kit is the optimal method. RNA was extracted from the serum of 8-week-old C57BL/6NJcl male mice according to the protocol of each RNA extraction kit. The yield of extracted RNA samples was calculated and electrophoretic patterns were evaluated by Agilent bioanalyzer. Expression patterns of the extracted RNA samples were confirmed by Agilent mouse miRNA microarray. The results showed significant differences in RNA yields in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit, and mirVana™ PARIS™ RNA and Native Protein Purification Kit compared to almost all other samples. Furthermore, two peaks were identified in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit using small RNA kit of Agilent bioanalyzer, one at 20-40 nucleotides (nt) and the other around 40-100 nt whereas the other reagents had a single peak. In addition, a high correlation was observed between the two RNA extraction kits in microarray. These results suggest that the above two kits are suitable for miRNA extraction from mouse serum.

2024-01-01 | GSE246437 | GEO

Nassar2022 - Microbome nucleic acid extraction kit NER model

Project description:Microbiome nucleic acid extraction kit model is a Named Entity Recognition (NER) model that identifies and annotates the name of the kits used in extracting microbiome nucleic acids in texts. This is the final model version used to annotate metagenomics publications in Europe PMC and enrich metagenomics studies in MGnify with kits metadata from literature. For more information, please refer to the following blogs: http://blog.europepmc.org/2020/11/europe-pmc-publications-metagenomics-annotations.html https://www.ebi.ac.uk/about/news/service-news/enriched-metadata-fields-mgnify-based-text-mining-associated-publications

2022-02-21 | MODEL2202170007 | BioModels

The assessment of differential expression in the hypothalamus following MMS

Project description:The hypothalamus was extracted from MMS and control groups immeadiately at the end of the paradigm on P6, RNA extraction done using Qiagen RNA/DNA extraction kits.

2021-06-01 | GSE147375 | GEO

Extraction of Entamoeba histolytica membrane proteins using three extraction methods

Project description:Entamoeba histolytica membrane proteins are important players in the parasite’s pathogenicity. However, most of the proteins have not been identified. This study reports the membrane proteins extracted using three extractions methods: two commercial kits (ProteoExtract® from Calbiochem and ProteoPrep® from Sigma), and a conventional laboratory method. The resulting membrane fractions (MF) and cytosolic fractions (CF)were analysed using LC-ESI-MS/MS. The proteins identified in at least two out of three biological replicates revealed a total of 490, 492, and 587 MF proteins extracted using the ProteoExtract® kit, ProteoPrep® kit and conventional method, respectively. Meanwhile, 487, 611 and 343 proteins were identified in the CF extracted using the ProteoExtract® kit, ProteoPrep® kit and conventional method, respectively. Analysis of the identified MF and CF proteins extracted by the respective extraction kits suggests that the ProteoPrep® extraction kit was the most selective in separating MF and CF among the three extraction methods.

2018-10-16 | PXD010171 | Pride

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

| PRJEB10820 | ENA