Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: 16S rDNA Ion Torrent Community Survey of Polish lakes with different Cyanobacteria prevalence

PROVIDER: PRJNA730760 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR14577644.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14577645.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14577646.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14577647.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14577648.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 25

Similar Datasets

Project description:16S rDNA Community Survey of High Elevation Alpine Lakes

| PRJNA607577 | ENA

Project description:Cyanobacteria 16S rDNA sequencing

| PRJNA623235 | ENA

Comparing Nanopore MinION and Ion torrent sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for marine samples using different pipelines and databases

Project description:16S marine amplicon - Oxford Nanopore versus Ion Torrent

| PRJEB48749 | ENA

Project description:16S rDNA in freshwater lakes

| PRJNA777015 | ENA

mixed culture

Project description:Ion Torrent Bias Experiment

| PRJNA167265 | ENA

MicroRNA sequencing of mouse soleus muscle

Project description:MicroRNA sequencing using Ion Torrent Proton platform

2015-03-31 | GSE63342 | GEO

A comparison of Illumina and Ion Torrent sequencing platforms in the context of differential gene expression

Project description:Background: Though Illumina has largely dominated the RNA-Seq field, the simultaneous availability of Ion Torrent has left scientists wondering which platform is most effective for differential gene expression (DGE) analysis. Previous investigations of this question have typically used reference samples derived from cell lines and brain tissue, and do not involve biological variability. While these comparisons might inform studies of tissue-specific expression, marked by large-scale transcriptional differences, this is not the common use case. Results: Here we employ a standard treatment/control experimental design, which enables us to evaluate these platforms in the context of the expression differences common in differential gene expression experiments. Specifically, we assessed the hepatic inflammatory response of mice by assaying liver RNA from control and IL-1β treated animals with both the Illumina HiSeq and the Ion Torrent Proton sequencing platforms. We found the greatest difference between the platforms at the level of read alignment, a moderate level of concordance at the level of DGE analysis, and nearly identical results at the level of differentially affected pathways. Interestingly, we also observed a strong interaction between sequencing platform and choice of aligner. By aligning both real and simulated Illumina and Ion Torrent data with the twelve most commonly-cited aligners in the literature, we observed that different aligner and platform combinations were better suited to probing different genomic features; for example, disentangling the source of expression in gene-pseudogene pairs. Conclusions: Taken together, our results indicate that while Illumina and Ion Torrent have similar capacities to detect changes in biology from a treatment/control experiment, these platforms may be tailored to interrogate different transcriptional phenomena through careful selection of alignment software.

2017-08-04 | GSE98562 | GEO

Vineyard soil

Project description:Ion Torrent Sequencing_Soil Fungal Metagenome

| PRJNA885132 | ENA

Project description:HBV RNA Ion Torrent sequencing

| PRJNA1015140 | ENA

Vineyard soil

Project description:Ion Torrent Sequencing_Soil Bacterial Metagenome

| PRJNA883056 | ENA