Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Microvolume DNA Extraction Methods for Microscale Amplicon and Metagenomic Studies

PROVIDER: PRJNA766133 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR16087000_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR16087000_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR16086939_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR16086939_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR16086940_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 234

Similar Datasets

Project description:Improved DNA extraction strategy for 16S rRNA amplicon based microbiome studies

| PRJNA531279 | ENA

Evaluation of lysis methods for the extraction of bacterial DNA for analysis of the broiler chicken cecal microbiota

Project description:Methods for the extraction of bacterial DNA

| PRJEB25932 | ENA

DNA isolation and informatics for microbiome studies

Project description:Toward standards in clinical microbiome studies: comparison of DNA extraction methods and bioinformatic pipelines

| PRJEB34118 | ENA

Equus caballus

Project description:aDNA extraction methods

| PRJNA289200 | ENA

Project description:Metagenomic DNA extraction of PCOS samples

| PRJNA855328 | ENA

Project description:Metagenomic DNA extraction of Industrial Effluent

| PRJNA819255 | ENA

The effects from DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of microbial diversity associated with human colonic tissue

Project description:Recent advances in (meta)genomic methods have provided new opportunities to examine host-microbe-environment interactions in the human gut. While opportunities exist to extract DNA from freshly sourced colonic tissue there are potentially valuable sources of DNA from historical studies that might also be examined. We examined how four different tissue DNA extraction methods employed in past clinical trials might impact the recovery of microbial DNA from a colonic tissue sample as assessed using a custom designed phylogenetic microarray for human gut bacteria and archaebacteria. While all methods of DNA extraction produced similar phylogenetic profiles some extraction specific biases were also observed. Real time PCR analysis targeting several bacterial groups substantiated this observation. These data suggest that while the efficacy of different DNA extraction methods differs somewhat all the methods tested produce an accurate representation of microbial diversity. This suggests that DNA samples archived in biobanks should be suitable for retrospective analyses.

2010-01-01 | GSE18420 | GEO

Fecal microbiomes

Project description:Benchmarking viral extraction methods

| PRJNA1004351 | ENA

human gut metagenome

Project description:Comparison of microbial DNA extraction methods for clinical applications

| PRJDB7617 | ENA

Project description:Metagenomic DNA extraction of diseased PCOS samples

| PRJNA855336 | ENA