The F-box cofactor UFO redirects the LEAFY floral regulator to novel cis-elements
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA842357 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR19397081_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR19397081_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR19397082_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR19397082_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR19397083_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 16 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:In angiosperms, flower patterning requires the localized expression of the APETALA3 (AP3) floral homeotic gene involved in petal and stamen development. AP3 is synergistically induced by the master transcription factor LEAFY (LFY) and the F-box protein UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS (UFO), but the molecular mechanism underlying this synergy has remained unknown. Here we show that the connection to ubiquitination pathways suggested by the F-box domain of UFO is mostly dispensable and that UFO instead acts by forming a transcriptional complex with LFY on newly discovered regulatory elements. The cryo-electron microscopy structure of the UFO-LFY-DNA complex shows that UFO-DNA contacts allows relocating LFY to novel DNA sites. Finally, we show that this complex has a deep evolutionary origin, largely predating flowering plants. This work unravels an unsuspected role for a member of one of the largest protein families in plants as a modulator of the DNA binding specificity of a master TF.
2023-01-01 | GSE204793 | GEO
Project description:Plants have evolved a unique and conserved developmental program that enables the conversion of leaves into floral organs. Elegant genetic and molecular work has identified key regulators of floral meristem identity. However, further understanding of flower meristem specification has been hampered by redundancy and by pleiotropic effects. The KNOXI gene STM transcription factor is a well-characterized regulator of shoot apical meristem maintenance. stm loss-of-function mutants arrest shortly after germination, and therefore the knowledge on later roles of STM, including flower development, is limited. Here, we uncover a role for STM in the specification of flower meristem identity. Silencing STM in the AP1 expression domain in the ap1-4 mutant background resulted in a complete leafy-like flower phenotype and an intermediate stm-2 allele enhanced the floral meristem identity phenotype of ap1-4. Transcriptional profiling of STM perturbation suggested that STM activity affects multiple meristem identity and flower transition genes, among them the F-Box gene UFO. In agreement, stm-2 enhanced the ufo-2 floral meristem fate phenotype, and ectopic UFO expression rescued the leafy flowers in genetic backgrounds with compromised AP1 and STM activities. This work suggests a molecular mechanism that underlies the activity of STM in the specification of flower meristem identity.
2018-05-04 | GSE113894 | GEO
Project description:The transcription factors LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1)_together with the AP1 paralog CAULIFLOWER (CAL)_control the onRep_of flower development in a partially redundant manner. This redundancy is thought to be mediated_at least in part_through the regulation of a shared Rep_of target genes. However_whether these genes are independently or cooperatively regulated by LFY and AP1/CAL_is currently unknown. To better understand the regulatory relationship between LFY and AP1/CAL during floral initiation_we monitored the activity of LFY in the absence of AP1/CAL function. We found that the regulation of several known LFY target genes is unaffected by AP1/CAL perturbation_while others appear to require AP1/CAL activity. Furthermore_we obtained evidence that LFY and AP1/CAL control the expression of some genes in an antagonistic manner. Notably_these include key regulators of floral initiation such TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1)_which had been previously reported to be directly repressed by both LFY and AP1. We show here that TFL1 expression is suppressed by AP1 but promoted by LFY. We further demonstrate that LFY has an inhibitory effect on flower formation in the absence of AP1/CAL activity. We propose that LFY and AP1/CAL may act as part of an incoherent feed-forward loop to control the establishment of a stable developmental program for the formation of flowers.
2017-04-28 | GSE96799 | GEO
Project description:The transcription factors LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1), together with the AP1 paralog CAULIFLOWER (CAL), control the onset of flower development in a partially redundant manner. This redundancy is thought to be mediated, at least in part, through the regulation of a shared set of target genes. However, whether these genes are independently or cooperatively regulated by LFY and AP1/CAL, is currently unknown. To better understand the regulatory relationship between LFY and AP1/CAL during floral initiation, we monitored the activity of LFY in the absence of AP1/CAL function. We found that the regulation of several known LFY target genes is unaffected by AP1/CAL perturbation, while others appear to require AP1/CAL activity. Furthermore, we obtained evidence that LFY and AP1/CAL control the expression of some genes in an antagonistic manner. Notably, these include key regulators of floral initiation such TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1), which had been previously reported to be directly repressed by both LFY and AP1. We show here that TFL1 expression is suppressed by AP1 but promoted by LFY. We further demonstrate that LFY has an inhibitory effect on flower formation in the absence of AP1/CAL activity. We propose that LFY and AP1/CAL may act as part of an incoherent feed-forward loop to control the establishment of a stable developmental program for the formation of flowers.
2017-04-28 | GSE96806 | GEO
Project description:Persistence of the invasive perennial weed leafy spurge is mainly attributed to seasonal production of underground adventitious buds (UABs), which undergo well-defined phases of dormancy (para-, endo- and eco-dormancy). These well-defined phases of dormancy also allow UABs of leafy spurge to survive extreme seasonal variations, including dehydration-stress. Consequently, objectives of this study include understanding the effects of dehydration-stress on vegetative reproduction, flowering competence, and transcript profiles at different phases of bud dormancy. The vegetative growth potential of UABs was monitored by removing the aerial portion of dehydration-stressed plants and re-watering the root system. Further, microarray analysis was used to follow transcriptome profiles to identify critical defense- and signaling-pathways at different phases of dormancy in UABs. Surprisingly, only 3 days of dehydration-stress is required to break the endodormant phase in UABs. In leafy spurge, vernalization of endodormant UABs has previously been shown to induce flower competence, while breaking of endodormancy via dehydration-stress did not induce floral induction. Thus, these two environmental treatments open a unique approach to independently dissect molecular mechanisms involved in endodormancy maintenance and floral competence. Bioinformatics analysis of transcriptome data helped to identify models and overlapping pathways. During endodormancy break, LEC1, PHOTOSYSTEM I RC, and brassinosteroids were identified as ooverlapping hubs of up-regulated genes, and DREB1A, CBF2, GPA1, MYC2, BHLH, BZIP, and flavonoids were identified as overlapping hubs of down-regulated genes. Additionally, key genes involved in metabolic activity, chromatin modification, and cross-talk between growth regulators were identified as playing a role during endodormancy maintenance.
2011-04-05 | GSE28047 | GEO
Project description:Multicellular organisms develop new structures by initiating specific gene regulatory programs through coordinated changes at the transcriptional and chromatin levels. Master transcription factors orchestrate such global changes but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Here we focus on LEAFY (LFY), a key regulator of flower development in angiosperms. The resolution of the crystallographic structure of its N-terminal domain shows that it forms an unanticipated Sterile Alpha Motif (SAM) domain. This domain drives LFY oligomerization, which we establish to be essential for LFY floral switch function. Combining in vitro and in vivo experiments, we demonstrate that oligomerization facilitates LFY binding to DNA regions with multiple binding sites. Moreover, genome-wide analyses reveal an additional prominent role for the oligomerization domain: it confers upon LFY the capacity to bind to closed chromatin regions. This novel property, combined with its previously demonstrated capacity to recruit chromatin remodelers, indicates that LFY controls floral fate by acting as a plant pioneer transcription factor.
2016-04-08 | GSE64245 | GEO
Project description:Litchi possesses unique flower morphology and adaptive reproduction strategies. Although previous attention has been intensively devoted to the mechanisms underlying its floral induction, the molecular basis of flower organ development remains largely unknown. MADS-box genes are promise candidates for this due to their significant roles in various aspects of inflorescence and flower organogenesis. Here, we present a detailed overview of phylogeny and expression profiles of 101 MADS-box genes that were identified in litchi. These LcMADSs are unevenly located across the 15 chromosomes, and can be divided into type I and type II genes. Fifty type I MADS-box genes are sub-divided into Mα, Mβ and Mγ subgroups, while fifty-one type II LcMADSs consist of 37 MIKCC -type and 14 MIKC*-type genes. Both two types of LcMADS genes mainly contain ABA and MeJA response elements. Tissue-specific and development-related expression analysis reveals that LcMADS51 could be positively involved in litchi carpel formation, while six MADS-box genes including LcMADS42/46/47/75/93/100 play a possible role in stamen development. GA is positively involved in the sex determination of litchi flowers by regulating the expression of LcMADS75 (LcAP1) and LcMADS51 (LcSTK). However, JA probably plays a negative role in litchi flower development.
2021-10-27 | GSE182439 | GEO
Project description:Litchi possesses unique flower morphology and adaptive reproduction strategies. Although previous attention has been intensively devoted to the mechanisms underlying its floral induction, the molecular basis of flower organ development remains largely unknown. MADS-box genes are promise candidates for this due to their significant roles in various aspects of inflorescence and flower organogenesis. Here, we present a detailed overview of phylogeny and expression profiles of 101 MADS-box genes that were identified in litchi. These LcMADSs are unevenly located across the 15 chromosomes, and can be divided into type I and type II genes. Fifty type I MADS-box genes are sub-divided into Mα, Mβ and Mγ subgroups, while fifty-one type II LcMADSs consist of 37 MIKCC -type and 14 MIKC*-type genes. Both two types of LcMADS genes mainly contain ABA and MeJA response elements. Tissue-specific and development-related expression analysis reveals that LcMADS51 could be positively involved in litchi carpel formation, while six MADS-box genes including LcMADS42/46/47/75/93/100 play a possible role in stamen development. GA is positively involved in the sex determination of litchi flowers by regulating the expression of LcMADS75 (LcAP1) and LcMADS51 (LcSTK). However, JA probably plays a negative role in litchi flower development.
2021-10-27 | GSE182444 | GEO
Project description:This submission contains the RNAseq data from one (just the study on paradormancy release) of several studies used to assemble the leafy spurge tranacriptome. These assembled transcrptome was built from 1) A study of leafy spurge crown buds through a time course for paradormancy release induced by excision of the aerial portion of the shoot (this study). 2) A study of leafy spurge crown buds through a seasonal dormancy time course where buds transitioned from paradoprmancy to endodormancy and then to ecodormancy (Series GSE71321). 3) A study identical to #2 above but where leafy spurge plants were first treated with glyphosate (Series GSE71406). 4) A previously submitted study (Series GSE56509) of leafy spurge shoots following treament with glyphosate was also used to assemble the transcriptome.
2015-08-05 | GSE71317 | GEO