Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Unknown,Transcriptomics,Genomics,Proteomics

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Comparative transcriptomic analysis between a high and a low sulfite producers wine yeast strains

ABSTRACT: The goal of this study was to compare the expression level of the whole genome of two wine yeast strains highly differing in their sulfite production (High producer strain: 10281A; Low producer strain: 1764A). Conditions maximizing SO2 production were selected: nitrogen rich media (425 mg/l assimilable nitrogen) and low temperature (16°C). This transcriptomic analysis was performed during the sulfite production phase, just after the entry in stationary phase. This analysis is part of a global work, aiming at the identification of the molecular basis of sulfite production by wine yeasts through physiologic, transcriptomic and genetic studies. Two strains compared in the same conditions with biological replicates following a dye-swap design.

ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae

SUBMITTER: Bruno Blondin

PROVIDER: E-GEOD-55083 | biostudies-arrayexpress |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-arrayexpress

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Identification of new Saccharomyces cerevisiae variants of the MET2 and SKP2 genes controlling the sulfur assimilation pathway and the production of undesirable sulfur compounds during alcoholic fermentation.

Noble Jessica J Sanchez Isabelle I Blondin Bruno B

Microbial cell factories 20150508

<h4>Background</h4>Wine yeasts can produce undesirable sulfur compounds during alcoholic fermentation, such as SO2 and H2S, in variable amounts depending mostly on the yeast strain but also on the conditions. However, although sulfur metabolism has been widely studied, some of the genetic determinants of differences in sulfite and/or sulfide production between wine yeast strains remain to be identified. In this study, we used an integrated approach to decipher the genetic determinants of variati ...[more]

PMID: 25947166

Similar Datasets

Comparative transcriptomic analysis between a high and a low sulfite producers wine yeast strains

Project description:The goal of this study was to compare the expression level of the whole genome of two wine yeast strains highly differing in their sulfite production (High producer strain: 10281A; Low producer strain: 1764A). Conditions maximizing SO2 production were selected: nitrogen rich media (425 mg/l assimilable nitrogen) and low temperature (16°C). This transcriptomic analysis was performed during the sulfite production phase, just after the entry in stationary phase. This analysis is part of a global work, aiming at the identification of the molecular basis of sulfite production by wine yeasts through physiologic, transcriptomic and genetic studies.

2015-05-14 | GSE55083 | GEO

A combined genetic and genomic approach uncovers molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits

Project description:Industrial wine yeast strains possess specific abilities to ferment under stressing conditions and give a suitable aromatic outcome. Although the fermentations properties of Saccharomyces cervisiae wine yeasts are well documented little is known on the genetic basis underlying the fermentation traits. Besides, although strain differences in gene expression has been reported, their relationships with gene expression variations and fermentation phenotypic variations is unknown. To both identify the genetic basis of fermentation traits and get insight on their relationships with gene expression variations, we combined fermentation traits QTL mapping and expression profiling in a segregating population from a cross between a wine yeast derivative and a laboratory strain. 40 samples are analysed with 2 technical replicates, using a unique reference named pool of the 30 segregants. The transcriptome of each segregant is compared to the transcriptome of the pool. The transcriptome of 5 biologic replicates of each parental strain is also compared to this reference. An haploid derivative of the commercialized wine yeast EC1118 which sequence is available (Novo et al. 2009. PNAS, 106:16333-16338) called 59A was used as industrial wine yeast. It is a prototroph strain and has a MATa sexual type. The haploid laboratory strain S288C (MATa) was used for crossing.

2011-01-19 | E-GEOD-26437 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Transcriptomic analyses of three wine yeast strains duting their response to nitrogen availability

Project description:A time-course transcriptomic experiment was performed in three geographically different wine yeast strains in order to test differences in gene expression as response to different nitrogen availability mRNA amounts for different wine yeast strains at different nitrogen availability was determined along the fermentation of a syntethic must. mRNA determinations were made at different fermentation stages (12, 24, 36 and 96 h after innoculation) Please note that there are two replicates per each stage (i.e. two raw data files per each sample; R1.txt and R2.txt) and the data were combined to generate the normalized data for each stage (i.e. sample).

2015-03-01 | E-GEOD-63187 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Differential gene expression in high and low sulfide-producing yeast strains during wine fermentation

Project description:Comparison between two commercial wine yeast strains (UCD522 and P29) differing in their production of H2S during wine fermentation. Due to the characteristics of the strains (commercial, non-standard wine strains), the experiment was duplicated using two completely different platforms and techniques (cDNA-based and in situ synthesized oligonucleotide-based). UCD522 and P29 wine microfermentations were performed in parallel and yeast samples were taken at the stage of fastest fermentation rate. Two biological replicates per yeast strain.

2010-05-18 | E-GEOD-16215 | biostudies-arrayexpress

A transcriptomic analysis of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increases in NADPH oxidation [2010]

Project description:Experience 2: 59A vs. 59A NADH Bdh200 mM, 59A NADPH Bdh200mM and 59A NADPH Bdh300 mM Analysis used RNA samples of three replicates by strain extracted from cells harvested at mid-exponential phase of wine fermentation

2012-03-31 | E-GEOD-34809 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Wine yeast EC1118 and CSM comparative transcriptomics during synthetic grape juice fermentation MS300 at day 6

Project description:CSM is a commercial wine yeast with a long chronological life span, while commercial strain EC1118 displays a short life span in laboratory synthetic complete medium SC. Our aim is compare their expression profile on a high sugar fermentation From a preculture of two days in YPD, MS300 was innoculated at 10exp6 cells/mL in filled-in 50 mL conical centrifuge tubes and they were cultivated at 24ºC with mild shaking for 6 days.

2011-10-25 | E-GEOD-33068 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Transcriptomic response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in mixed-culture wine fermentation with Hanseniaspora guilliermondii

Project description:Natural grape-juice fermentations involve the sequential development of different yeast species which strongly influence the chemical and sensorial traits of the final product. In the present study,we aimed to examine the transcriptomic response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the presence of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii wine fermentation. Paralell fermentations were carried out in natural grape-juice using S. cerevisiae for both single and mixed culture with a H. guilliermondii strain. For RNA extraction, cells were collected at 24h, 48h and 96 h from both fermentations

2015-12-24 | E-GEOD-66521 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Genome-wide fitness profiling of the homozygous and heterozygous diploid yeast deletion collection in the context of fermentation

Project description:Homozygous and heterozygous yeast deletion collections were profiled over the course of a 14 day fermentation in synthetic grape juice. Samples were compared to day 1 of the fermentation.

2011-09-30 | E-MEXP-3332 | biostudies-arrayexpress

The effect of elevated copper concentrations on protein production in copper and sulfite tolerant S. cerevisiae

Project description:Copper tolerance and sulfite tolerance are two well-studied phenotypic traits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The genetic bases of these traits are derived from allelic expansion at the CUP1 locus and reciprocal translocation at the SSU1 locus, respectively. Previous work identified a negative association between sulfite and copper tolerance in S. cerevisiae wine yeasts. Here we probe the relationship between sulfite and copper tolerance and show that an increase in CUP1 copy number does not impart copper tolerance in all S. cerevisiae wine yeast. Bulk-segregant QTL analysis was used to identify variance at SSU1 as a causative factor in copper sensitivity, which was verified by reciprocal hemizygosity analysis in a strain carrying 20 copies of CUP1. Transcriptional and proteomic analysis demonstrated that SSU1 over-expression did not suppress CUP1 transcription or constrain protein production but suggested that SSU1 overexpression induced sulfur limitation during exposure to copper. Finally, an SSU1 over-expressing strain exhibited increased sensitivity to moderately elevated copper concentrations in sulfur-limited medium, demonstrating that SSU1 over-expression burdens the sulfate assimilation pathway. Over-expression of MET 3/14/16, genes upstream of H2S production in the sulfate assimilation pathway increased the production of SO2 and H2S but did not improve copper sensitivity in an SSU1 overexpressing background. We conclude that copper and sulfite tolerance are conditional traits in S. cerevisiae and provide evidence of the metabolic basis for their mutual exclusivity. These findings suggest an evolutionary basis for the extreme amplification of CUP1 observed in some yeasts.

2023-03-22 | PXD037997 | Pride

Comparative transcriptome analysis between an original and a recombinant wine yeast strain defective for KNR4/SMI1

Project description:EKD-13 is among the recently developed mannoprotein overproducing strains. It is a recombinant derivative of the well known EC1118 commercial strain, in which the ORF of all the alleles of KNR4/SMI1 was replaced by different integration cassettes. Lack of Knr4p resulted in a negligible impairment in fermentation kinetics and a net reduction in bentonite requirements to attain complete protein stabilization of white wines made out of natural grape must. In order to improve the technological characterization of this strain, and to better understand the mechanisms underlying mannoprotein oversecretion, we have analyzed kinetics of mannoprotein release and autolysis during fermentation and aging, and we have performed a genome wide expression analysis in two different steps of the fermentation process. The results give some additional clues on KNR4 function in S. cerevisiae as well as on the best application conditions for this recombinant strain. A comparative transcriptome analysis between the S. cerevisiae recombinant strain (EKD-13) defective for KNR4/SMI1 and the wild-type strain (EC1118) was implemented. At every step of the fermentation (mid-exponential growth phase of fermentation advancement as 10 g of released CO2 and stationary-growth phase as 70 g of CO2 released) a recombinant and a WT yeast samples are put on a slide. There are three biological replicates that are labeled in dye-switch way (sometimes called biological dye-swap) for each step of fermentation leading to 3 independent intensity values for each gene (spots) on the microarrays. This experimental design minimizes the intrinsic biological noise between identical culture conditions and the technical variations inherent to the DNA microarray technology. In summary, there are six samples, each corresponding to comparisons between independent fermentations of both strains.

2011-02-28 | E-GEOD-26965 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data