Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Identifying vulnerable mother-infant dyads: a psychometric evaluation of two observational coding systems using varying interaction periods.


ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Clinical services require feasible assessments of parent-infant interaction in order to identify dyads requiring parenting intervention. We assessed the reliability and predictive validity of two observational tools and tested whether briefer forms could be identified which retain acceptable psychometric properties over short observation periods.

Methods

A stratified high-risk community sample of 250 mother-infant dyads from The Wirral Child Health and Development Study completed 7-min play-based interaction at 6-8 months. Film-footage was independently coded by two trained raters using PIIOS and NICHD-SECCYD systems. Incremental predictive validity was assessed from 3, 5 and 7 min observation to attachment outcomes (Strange Situation; 14 months) and infant mental health (BITSEA; 14 and 30 months).

Results

Excellent inter-rater reliability was evident at code and subscale level for each tool and observation period. Stability of within-rater agreement was optimal after 5 min observation. ROC analysis confirmed predictive (discriminant) validity (AUCs >0.70) to top decile age 2 mental health outcomes for PIIOS total score and a brief 3-item composite from NICHD-SECCYD (sensitivity, intrusiveness, positive regard; NICHD-3), but not to attachment outcomes. Logistic regression showed dyads rated at-risk for externalizing problems using NICHD-3 were also at significantly higher risk for insecurity at 14 months (OR = 2.7, p = 0.004).

Conclusion

PIIOS total and NICHD-3 ratings from 5 min observation are both reliable and valid tools for use in clinical practice. Findings suggest NICHD-3 may have greater utility due to its comparative brevity to train and code, with suitability for use over a broader developmental time frame (3-24 months).

SUBMITTER: Sharp H 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11233099 | biostudies-literature | 2024

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Identifying vulnerable mother-infant dyads: a psychometric evaluation of two observational coding systems using varying interaction periods.

Sharp Helen H   Vitoratou Silia S   O'Mahen Heather H   Bozicevic Laura L   Refberg Miriam M   Hayes Chloe C   Gay Jessica J   Pickles Andrew A  

Frontiers in psychology 20240624


<h4>Introduction</h4>Clinical services require feasible assessments of parent-infant interaction in order to identify dyads requiring parenting intervention. We assessed the reliability and predictive validity of two observational tools and tested whether briefer forms could be identified which retain acceptable psychometric properties over short observation periods.<h4>Methods</h4>A stratified high-risk community sample of 250 mother-infant dyads from The Wirral Child Health and Development Stu  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10911031 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5853645 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8856509 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8132443 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10423724 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5546096 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6072011 | biostudies-literature
2025-01-24 | MSV000096943 | GNPS
2024-05-27 | PXD046387 | Pride
| S-EPMC2923602 | biostudies-other