Dataset Information

THE POTENTIAL FOR BIAS IN PRINCIPAL CAUSAL EFFECT ESTIMATION WHEN TREATMENT RECEIVED DEPENDS ON A KEY COVARIATE.

ABSTRACT: Motivated by a potential-outcomes perspective, the idea of principal stratification has been widely recognized for its relevance in settings susceptible to posttreatment selection bias such as randomized clinical trials where treatment received can differ from treatment assigned. In one such setting, we address subtleties involved in inference for causal effects when using a key covariate to predict membership in latent principal strata. We show that when treatment received can differ from treatment assigned in both study arms, incorporating a stratum-predictive covariate can make estimates of the "complier average causal effect" (CACE) derive from observations in the two treatment arms with different covariate distributions. Adopting a Bayesian perspective and using Markov chain Monte Carlo for computation, we develop posterior checks that characterize the extent to which incorporating the pretreatment covariate endangers estimation of the CACE. We apply the method to analyze a clinical trial comparing two treatments for jaw fractures in which the study protocol allowed surgeons to overrule both possible randomized treatment assignments based on their clinical judgment and the data contained a key covariate (injury severity) predictive of treatment received.

SUBMITTER: Zigler CM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3269822 | biostudies-literature | 2011

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

THE POTENTIAL FOR BIAS IN PRINCIPAL CAUSAL EFFECT ESTIMATION WHEN TREATMENT RECEIVED DEPENDS ON A KEY COVARIATE.

Zigler Corwin M CM Belin Thomas R TR

The annals of applied statistics 20110101 3

Motivated by a potential-outcomes perspective, the idea of principal stratification has been widely recognized for its relevance in settings susceptible to posttreatment selection bias such as randomized clinical trials where treatment received can differ from treatment assigned. In one such setting, we address subtleties involved in inference for causal effects when using a key covariate to predict membership in latent principal strata. We show that when treatment received can differ from treat ...[more]

PMID: 22308190

Similar Datasets

Project description:Exploration of causal mechanisms is often important for researchers and policymakers to understand how an intervention works and how it can be improved. This task can be crucial in clustered encouragement designs (CED). Encouragement design studies arise frequently when the treatment cannot be enforced because of ethical or practical constrains and an encouragement intervention (information campaigns, incentives, etc) is conceived with the purpose of increasing the uptake of the treatment of interest. By design, encouragements always entail the complication of non-compliance. Encouragements can also give rise to a variety of mechanisms, particularly when encouragement is assigned at cluster level. Social interactions among units within the same cluster can result in spillover effects. Disentangling the effect of encouragement through spillover effects from that through the enhancement of the treatment would give better insight into the intervention and it could be compelling for planning the scaling-up phase of the program. Building on previous works on CEDs and non-compliance, we use the principal stratification framework to define stratum-specific causal effects, that is, effects for specific latent subpopulations, defined by the joint potential compliance statuses under both encouragement conditions. We show how the latter stratum-specific causal effects are related to the decomposition commonly used in the literature and provide flexible homogeneity assumptions under which an extrapolation across principal strata allows one to disentangle the effects. Estimation of causal estimands can be performed with Bayesian inferential methods using hierarchical models to account for clustering. We illustrate the proposed methodology by analyzing a cluster randomized experiment implemented in Zambia and designed to evaluate the impact on malaria prevalence of an agricultural loan program intended to increase the bed net coverage. Farmer households assigned to the program could take advantage of a deferred payment and a discount in the purchase of new bed nets. Our analysis shows a lack of evidence of an effect of the offering of the program to a cluster of households through spillover effects, that is through a greater bed net coverage in the neighborhood.

Dataset Information

THE POTENTIAL FOR BIAS IN PRINCIPAL CAUSAL EFFECT ESTIMATION WHEN TREATMENT RECEIVED DEPENDS ON A KEY COVARIATE.

Publications

THE POTENTIAL FOR BIAS IN PRINCIPAL CAUSAL EFFECT ESTIMATION WHEN TREATMENT RECEIVED DEPENDS ON A KEY COVARIATE.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets