Dataset Information

Applications of pulsed EPR spectroscopy to structural studies of sulfite oxidizing enzymes().

ABSTRACT: Sulfite oxidizing enzymes (SOEs), including sulfite oxidase (SO) and bacterial sulfite dehydrogenase (SDH), catalyze the oxidation of sulfite (SO(3) (2-)) to sulfate (SO(4) (2-)). The active sites of SO and SDH are nearly identical, each having a 5-coordinate, pseudo-square-pyramidal Mo with an axial oxo ligand and three equatorial sulfur donor atoms. One sulfur is from a conserved Cys residue and two are from a pyranopterindithiolene (molybdopterin, MPT) cofactor. The identity of the remaining equatorial ligand, which is solvent-exposed, varies during the catalytic cycle. Numerous in vitro studies, particularly those involving electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of the Mo(V) states of SOEs, have shown that the identity and orientation of this exchangeable equatorial ligand depends on the buffer pH, the presence and concentration of certain anions in the buffer, as well as specific point mutations in the protein. Until very recently, however, EPR has not been a practical technique for directly probing specific structures in which the solvent-exposed, exchangeable ligand is an O, OH(-), H(2)O, SO(3) (2-), or SO(4) (2-) group, because the primary O and S isotopes ((16)O and (32)S) are magnetically silent (I = 0). This review focuses on the recent advances in the use of isotopic labeling, variable-frequency high resolution pulsed EPR spectroscopy, synthetic model compounds, and DFT calculations to elucidate the roles of various anions, point mutations, and steric factors in the formation, stabilization, and transformation of SOE active site structures.

SUBMITTER: Klein EL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3579671 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Applications of pulsed EPR spectroscopy to structural studies of sulfite oxidizing enzymes().

Klein Eric L EL Astashkin Andrei V AV Raitsimring Arnold M AM Enemark John H JH

Coordination chemistry reviews 20130101 1

Sulfite oxidizing enzymes (SOEs), including sulfite oxidase (SO) and bacterial sulfite dehydrogenase (SDH), catalyze the oxidation of sulfite (SO(3) (2-)) to sulfate (SO(4) (2-)). The active sites of SO and SDH are nearly identical, each having a 5-coordinate, pseudo-square-pyramidal Mo with an axial oxo ligand and three equatorial sulfur donor atoms. One sulfur is from a conserved Cys residue and two are from a pyranopterindithiolene (molybdopterin, MPT) cofactor. The identity of the remaining ...[more]

PMID: 23440026

Similar Datasets

Project description:Sulfite oxidizing enzymes are essential mononuclear molybdenum (Mo) proteins involved in sulfur metabolism of animals, plants and bacteria. There are three such enzymes presently known: (1) sulfite oxidase (SO) in animals, (2) SO in plants, and (3) sulfite dehydrogenase (SDH) in bacteria. X-ray crystal structures of enzymes from all three sources (chicken SO, Arabidopsis thaliana SO, and Starkeya novella SDH) show nearly identical square pyramidal coordination around the Mo atom, even though the overall structures of the proteins and the presence of additional cofactors vary. This structural information provides a molecular basis for studying the role of specific amino acids in catalysis. Animal SO catalyzes the final step in the degradation of sulfur-containing amino acids and is critical in detoxifying excess sulfite. Human SO deficiency is a fatal genetic disorder that leads to early death, and impaired SO activity is implicated in sulfite neurotoxicity. Animal SO and bacterial SDH contain both Mo and heme domains, whereas plant SO only has the Mo domain. Intraprotein electron transfer (IET) between the Mo and Fe centers in animal SO and bacterial SDH is a key step in the catalysis, which can be studied by laser flash photolysis in the presence of deazariboflavin. IET studies on animal SO and bacterial SDH clearly demonstrate the similarities and differences between these two types of sulfite oxidizing enzymes. Conformational change is involved in the IET of animal SO, in which electrostatic interactions may play a major role in guiding the docking of the heme domain to the Mo domain prior to electron transfer. In contrast, IET measurements for SDH demonstrate that IET occurs directly through the protein medium, which is distinctly different from that in animal SO. Point mutations in human SO can result in significantly impaired IET or no IET, thus rationalizing their fatal effects. The recent developments in our understanding of sulfite oxidizing enzyme mechanisms that are driven by a combination of molecular biology, rapid kinetics, pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and computational techniques are the subject of this review.

Project description:Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) investigation of the Mo(V) center of the pathogenic R160Q mutant of human sulfite oxidase (hSO) confirms the presence of three distinct species whose relative abundances depend upon pH. Species 1 is exclusively present at pH < or = 6, and remains in significant amounts even at pH 8. Variable-frequency electron spin echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) studies of this species prepared with (33)S-labeled sulfite clearly show the presence of coordinated sulfate, as has previously been found for the "blocked" form of Arabidopsis thaliana at low pH (Astashkin, A. V.; Johnson-Winters, K.; Klein, E. L.; Byrne, R. S.; Hille, R.; Raitsimring, A. M.; Enemark, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14800). The ESEEM spectra of Species 1 prepared in (17)O-enriched water show both strongly and weakly magnetically coupled (17)O atoms that can be assigned to an equatorial sulfate ligand and the axial oxo ligand, respectively. The nuclear quadrupole interaction (nqi) of the axial oxo ligand is substantially stronger than those found for other oxo-Mo(V) centers studied previously. Additionally, pulsed electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) measurements reveal a nearby weakly coupled exchangeable proton. The structure for Species 1 proposed from the pulsed EPR results using isotopic labeling is a six-coordinate Mo(V) center with an equatorial sulfate ligand that is hydrogen bonded to an exchangeable proton. Six-coordination is supported by the (17)O nqi parameters for the axial oxo group of the model compound, (dttd)Mo(17)O((17)Otms), where H2dttd = 2,3:8,9-dibenzo-1,4,7,10-tetrathiadecane; tms = trimethylsilyl. Reduction of R160Q to Mo(V) with Ti(III) gives primarily Species 2, another low pH form, whereas reduction with sulfite at higher pH values gives a mixture of Species 1 and 2, as well as the "primary" high pH form of wild-type SO. The occurrence of significant amounts of the "sulfate-blocked" form of R160Q (Species 1) at physiological pH suggests that this species may be a contributing factor to the lethality of this mutation.

Dataset Information

Applications of pulsed EPR spectroscopy to structural studies of sulfite oxidizing enzymes().

Publications

Applications of pulsed EPR spectroscopy to structural studies of sulfite oxidizing enzymes().

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets