Dataset Information

Smoking and body fat mass in relation to bone mineral density and hip fracture: the Hordaland Health Study.

ABSTRACT: Lower bone mineral density (BMD) in smokers may be attributable to lower body weight or fat mass, rather than to a direct effect of smoking. We analyzed the effects of smoking exposure, assessed by plasma cotinine, and body fat on BMD and the risk of subsequent hip fracture. In the community-based Hordaland Health Study (HUSK), 3003 participants 46-49 years and 2091 subjects 71-74 years were included. Cotinine was measured in plasma and information on health behaviors was obtained from self-administered questionnaires. BMD and total body soft tissue composition were measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Information on hip fracture was obtained from computerized records containing discharge diagnoses for hospitalizations between baseline examinations 1997-2000 through December 31st, 2009. In the whole cohort, moderate and heavy smokers had stronger positive associations between fat mass and BMD compared to never smokers (differences in regression coefficient (95% CI) per % change in fat mass = 1.38 (0.24, 2.52) and 1.29 (0.17, 2.4), respectively). In moderate and heavy smokers there was a nonlinear association between BMD and fat mass with a stronger positive association at low compared to high levels of fat mass (Davies segmented test, p<0.001). In elderly women and men, heavy smokers had an increased risk of hip fracture compared to never smokers (hazard ratio = 3.31, 95% CI: 2.05, 5.35; p<0.001). In heavy smokers there was a tendency of a lower risk of hip fracture with higher percentage of fat mass. The deleterious effect of smoking on bone health is stronger in lean smokers than in smokers with high fat mass.

SUBMITTER: Oyen J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3965480 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Smoking and body fat mass in relation to bone mineral density and hip fracture: the Hordaland Health Study.

Øyen Jannike J Gram Gjesdal Clara C Nygård Ottar Kjell OK Lie Stein Atle SA Meyer Haakon E HE Apalset Ellen Margrete EM Ueland Per Magne PM Pedersen Eva Ringdal ER Midttun Øivind Ø Vollset Stein Emil SE Tell Grethe S GS

PloS one 20140325 3

Lower bone mineral density (BMD) in smokers may be attributable to lower body weight or fat mass, rather than to a direct effect of smoking. We analyzed the effects of smoking exposure, assessed by plasma cotinine, and body fat on BMD and the risk of subsequent hip fracture. In the community-based Hordaland Health Study (HUSK), 3003 participants 46-49 years and 2091 subjects 71-74 years were included. Cotinine was measured in plasma and information on health behaviors was obtained from self-admi ...[more]

PMID: 24667849

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMuscle weakness is a key factor in the increase risk of falls and might also play a significant role in the increase of risk of hip fracture. Computed tomography-measured muscle size and muscle density are well-established imaging biomarkers used in studies of physical function, frailty or cancer, but limited to hip fracture. In particular, it is warranted to have a better understanding of the performance of muscle size and density in the discrimination of acute hip fractures. We also aim to determine age-related differences of muscle size and density in healthy controls and hip fracture patients.MethodsFour hundred thirty-eight low-energy acute hip fracture cases and 316 healthy controls from the China Action on Spine and Hip Status study were included in the study. Muscle cross-sectional area and density were measured for the gluteus maximus and gluteus medius and minimus. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the femoral neck and total hip was measured. Using propensity score matching, we generated three samples with cases and controls matched for age, body mass index, and gender: femoral neck fracture (FNF), intertrochanteric fracture (ITF), and any hip fracture vs. controls, respectively.ResultsHandgrip strength, gluteus muscle area and density, and bone parameters of the matched hip fracture groups were lower than those of the correspondence control groups, respectively (P < 0.05). The univariate analysis showed that associations of aBMD with FNF and with ITF were significantly weaker than associations between fracture and muscle parameters. Gluteus medius and minimus muscle density showed the highest areas under the curve (AUC) with FNF (0.88, 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.92) and trochanteric fracture (0.95, 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.97). The model including all muscle and bone parameters provided the highest AUC (FNF: AUC 0.912; ITF: AUC 0.958), and AUC results of another selected model without muscle density showed that association with fracture significantly dropped (FNF: AUC 0.755; ITF: AUC 0.858). Separate results for the two age groups younger and older than 70 years showed no age-related significant differences in discriminate models.ConclusionsMuscle density performs better than aBMD from hip computed tomography X-ray absorptiometry and muscle size in discrimination of hip fracture. Combination of aBMD and muscle density provided the best discrimination. The integration of muscle assessments may trigger a paradigm shift in hip fracture prediction. Gluteus muscle density should also be evaluated as treatment outcome.

Project description:ImportanceScreening for osteoporosis with bone mineral density (BMD) is recommended for older adults. It is unclear whether repeating a BMD screening test improves fracture risk assessment.ObjectivesTo determine whether changes in BMD after 4 years provide additional information on fracture risk beyond baseline BMD and to quantify the change in fracture risk classification after a second BMD measure.Design, setting, and participantsPopulation-based cohort study involving 310 men and 492 women from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study with 2 measures of femoral neck BMD taken from 1987 through 1999.Main outcomes and measuresRisk of hip or major osteoporotic fracture through 2009 or 12 years following the second BMD measure.ResultsMean age was 74.8 years. The mean (SD) BMD change was -0.6% per year (1.8%). Throughout a median follow-up of 9.6 years, 76 participants experienced an incident hip fracture and 113 participants experienced a major osteoporotic fracture. Annual percent BMD change per SD decrease was associated with risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.78]) and major osteoporotic fracture (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.45]) after adjusting for baseline BMD. At 10 years' follow-up, 1 SD decrease in annual percent BMD change compared with the mean BMD change was associated with 3.9 excess hip fractures per 100 persons. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, the addition of BMD change to a model with baseline BMD did not meaningfully improve performance. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.78) for the baseline BMD model compared with 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.75) for the BMD percent change model. Moreover, the addition of BMD change to a model with baseline BMD did not meaningfully improve performance (AUC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.79]). Using the net reclassification index, a second BMD measure increased the proportion of participants reclassified as high risk of hip fracture by 3.9% (95% CI, -2.2% to 9.9%), whereas it decreased the proportion classified as low risk by -2.2% (95% CI, -4.5% to 0.1%).Conclusions and relevanceIn untreated men and women of mean age 75 years, a second BMD measure after 4 years did not meaningfully improve the prediction of hip or major osteoporotic fracture. Repeating a BMD measure within 4 years to improve fracture risk stratification may not be necessary in adults this age untreated for osteoporosis.

Project description:During median follow-up 6.0 years in 9622 individuals, prior loss in estimated total body lean mass (TBLM), but not total body fat mass loss (TBFM), was associated with increased fracture risk, particularly for hip fracture.IntroductionWeight loss, and especially muscle loss, adversely affects skeletal health. The FRAX® tool considers baseline body mass index, but not body composition nor changes in its components over time. Our aim was to compare the independent associations between prior loss in DXA-estimated TBLM and TBFM and subsequent fracture risk.MethodsWe identified women and men age 40 years or older with two DXA assessments at least 1 year apart (median interval 3.3 years). TBLM and TBFM were estimated from weight, sex, and DXA of the spine and hip. Incident fractures and deaths were ascertained from linked population-based health service data after the date of the second DXA. Hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox regression models were used to study time to fracture from prior loss in TBLM and TBFM adjusted for FRAX-related covariates.ResultsThe study population consisted of 9622 individuals (mean age 67 [SD 10] years, 95% female). We identified 692 subjects with incident major osteoporotic fracture [MOF] and 194 with hip fracture. Mean TBLM loss was significantly greater in those with incident MOF and hip fracture (P < 0.001) while TBFM loss was only significantly greater in those with incident hip fracture (P < 0.001). Each SD greater TBLM loss was associated with 10-13% increased MOF risk and 29-38% increased hip fracture risk, adjusted for TBFM loss and other covariates. Prior TBFM loss was not associated with fractures when adjusted for TBLM loss.ConclusionsPrior loss in total body lean mass, but not in fat mass, is associated with increased fracture risk, particularly hip fracture, independent of other risk factors. This is consistent with the hypothesis that muscle loss (sarcopenia) adversely impacts skeletal health and fracture risk.

Dataset Information

Smoking and body fat mass in relation to bone mineral density and hip fracture: the Hordaland Health Study.

Publications

Smoking and body fat mass in relation to bone mineral density and hip fracture: the Hordaland Health Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets